/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9296973
Cmon anon, I was trying to keep it /vr/ friendly but you just had to post an FW900!
I'll return your challenge with an F520.

>>9296972
Looking back at some older threads I have to agree, I was a little too persistent with the whole avatar thing.
At least most of my posts were good, they have aged well.

>>9297019
2560x1600@60hz is 350mhz, which is just barely above the 330-340mhz the Delock 62967 can "overclock" to.
Sunix DPU3000 (and probably Delock 87685) can do some insane high pixel clocks (720mhz? confirm pls), but it's a lot more expensive too.

>>9297059
That unit cannot consistently reach super high bandwidths, it seems to vary by batch. Read the reviews, they also claim this.

>>8538549
Agreed
though picrel was actually never serviced when this pic was taken