/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10922371
Short answer: No.
Long answer: The game is riddled with massive technical issues and lackluster design due to being rushed out the door by Acclaim.
It's very evident Acclaim pushed the game to release before the final master was tested, just like with Shadow Man 2.
Here's a quick list of major technical issues I can list off the bat:
>Enemies spinning in circles, sometimes right in front of your face. Sometimes they even attack you even when they aren't suppose to*
>Collision issues, missing level geometry, etc*
>Elements of the game clearly malfunctioning, such as the particles on the wind vents in Chapter 4 being stuck, which causes the game to run at single digits due to all the overdraw.*
>Lack of proper enemy feedback, some enemies just poof into particles or disappear entirely rather than having unique animations*.
>Very poor item balancing. The damage the Fireswarm deals is piss-poor despite chewing ammo, while the sniper is overpowered and barely takes up resources*
>Rough animation especially when compared to the previous entries. The first boss ending cinematic is especially bad.
>Some rooms are flat out empty.*
* = Nightdive attempted to fix these for the remaster
The nicest thing I can say about the game is that despite how rushed it was, there's no moments where it becomes unplayable or frustrating.

>>10443904
>Turok 3 was really ambitious. It was giving you a half-life esque experience on 1996 N64 hardware. This was a great choice for a remaster, it deserved it.
This game needed it the most out of the trilogy. Acclaim rushed it out the door and released it with no quality control whatsoever.
All of their 6th generation games would also suffer the same fate, Shadow Man 2 has a glitch where whole levels can turn into missing textures and was sold like that.

Remaster in 1 week, it will be a shitshow if they don't fix the glitches.