/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9983508
NTA he did give you an answer and you didn't realise because you're lazy

>>9245830
>Improving gameplay doesn't count!!
You must not have put much thought into what you were asking for then, as it's generally considered bad practice to break compatibility with controllers for the sake of fulfilling the arbitrary criteria of some posturing sad sack decades in the future. Since 6-button was standard on the Saturn it actually makes sense to have games that utilize unique uses for each button. Off the top of my head, Radiant Silvergun and Tomb Raider.

I'll say it again, you can play Dropkick on a 6-button and it's still fun. You're allowed to like the SNES pad. I'm allowed to like the 6-button. Your failure to substantiate any criticism of the controller design means you don't have any. This conversation is clearly over.

>>8956748
If it were actually processing 3D vector map data, that map data would be stored as a sequence of x,y,z coordinates. Instead, the z-coordinate data is assigned to the sector rather than the vertices because the vertices only occupy a 2D plane.
>The vertices for a map are stored in the VERTEXES lump, which consists of a raw sequence of x, y coordinates as pairs of 16-bit signed integers.
Your insistence that the map data isn't 2D despite the actual evidence I've provided would indicate that you're as bad at reading as you are at geometry.
>But but but if you're adding another dimension then it isn't 2D
The coordinate data is attributed to the linedefs and sectors. The vertices those linedefs and sectors are comprised of are stored in x,y space. That means the map isn't gaining another dimension geometrically. Read a book. Preferably without pictures.

>>8852832

>>8571456
If you have to put all that bullshit in front of a question, you've already lost the argument.

>>7708698
>Relying on weasel wording
>Forgetting the argumentation to shield your ego
By attempting to convince yourself you haven't been repeatedly btfo by constantly shifting the goalpost, you've effectively conceded ya retarded narcissistic ignoramus
>>7709240
>nothing of note
Meaning you'll arbitrarily claim any exclusive game is shit because you know your stance is shit.
If having Wily Wars, Pulseman, Power Drive, Alien Soldier, Nightmare Circus, and Maui Mallard as exclusives doesn't mean anything to you, that would indicate that you have shit taste or, more likely, are arguing in bad faith and just want something to feel superior about because of your crippling insecurity
>I'm not a regular poster here
There is no reason to even mention that besides attempting to not appear like a pathetic obsessive getting excited over being wrong and then changing your stance like a psychotic retard
>>7709401
>larping to feel better about yourself because you know you're wrong
>>7709438
>You can't dump Sega Channel games!
"Satellaview had DRM"
>yeah well nobody cares grumble grumble
The person I was talking to did care, but I'm obviously talking to a retard, now.
It's almost like you're not even paying attention at this point

Way to give up in such a bombastic manner, it's too bad you suck so hard at arguing that you have to pretend ignoring the opposition isn't conceding just to delude yourself into believing you have anything relevant or substantial to say

retard

>>7682395

>>7468494
I already have. The reason you find it boring is because you're not trying to improve.
>You clearly don't value improving your plays because you don't care about the game itself.
>The gameplay becomes stupid when the game is played by stupid, ya stupid.

But naturally you're going to ignore that because you're indignant.

>You can't even refute that Pac-Man is just collecting pellets and avoiding ghosts because that's literally all there is to the gameplay. It's boring and it sucks because I'm boring and I suck

>>7413590

>>7300826