[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:


View post   

>> No.3183862 [View]
File: 66 KB, 600x898, get.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3183862

>>3183796

>playing video games

I can shitpost too, faggot.

>> No.3150953 [View]
File: 66 KB, 600x898, get.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3150953

>280 bucks for Conker

Fuck this place. OP was a fucking moron.

Sorry OP I usually try to not be mean to the OP because you fucktards get enough shit but good fucking GOD what the fuck happened when you were perusing this place?

>> No.2853189 [View]
File: 66 KB, 600x898, get.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2853189

>>2852481

I feel like every time this image gets posted I lose a few brain cells. Hear me out and consider this:

The artist was merely trying to represent what it looked like on the monitor on paper. In doing so, it would not make much sense to intentionally blur the pixels on paper. On paper, the more defined look makes sense. That however, does not mean that that was the intended look. They were just replicating it on paper.

You need to prove that the artist intended for that to look the way it did on paper because I have never seen any evidence for the claim nor have I seen it logically thought out at all. I have only seen people claim that 'WELL, SINCE THEY DREW IT ON PAPER THIS MUST MEAN IT WAS WHAT WAS INTENDED TO LOOK LIKE ON TELEVISIONS, SO THIS JUSTIFIES MY USE OF SHITTY FILTERS".

So yeah, consider that.

>> No.2779587 [View]
File: 66 KB, 600x898, get.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2779587

>>2776901

>hating on Woosley

Whatever dude.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]