/vr/ - Retro Games

>>8363453
>>8363459
>grade-worthy

Are you just pretending to be retarded? I don't really care for the practice myself but in theory "grading" doesn't mean "must be in good quality", it means rating the product to determine its quality. Which means anything can be graded. You could ask pic related to be graded if you wanted, you'd just get a 2/10, but at least you'd know you could sell it as a 2/10 and not a 1/10

now of course in practice nobody does that, but grading something of "just good" quality fits with the whole point of the system

And yes I still can question the whole point behind "grading", question the integrity and relevancy of the graders, etc but that's not what this post is about. The point is, if you want to criticize grading, at least try to grasp the basics of the system instead of thinking that by definition items have to be "worthy" to be graded