/vr/ - Retro Games

Anonymous Sun Feb 21 00:25:12 2021 No.7445346 [View]
File: 758 KB, 972x663, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>7444797
>GC has objectively better specs
You have no idea what you're talking about, begone zoomer.

PS2 is 147Mhz pixels per cycle x 16 pixel pipelines = 2352 megapixels fill rate.

Gamecube is 162Mhz pixels per cycle x 4 pixel pipelines = 648 megapixels fill rate.

PS2 Emotion Engine FPU + VU0 is 3.08 GLFOPS

Gamecube Gecko is 1.9 GLFOPS

The PS2 was objectively mpre powerful than the GC, but it was harder to program for, suffered from a hardware AA bug which wasted resources on supersampling to get rid of jaggies, and lacked texture decompression, though of course it wasn't as wasteful as GC's fixed processing power with it's gimped custom FPU that also served as it's SIMD unit.

If you would like to learn more, follow the user's "rusty" replies in this thread. He really laid it down in pages 50ish-60ish
https://www.sega-16.com/forum/showthread.php?26634-PS2-vs-Dreamcast-Graphics

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

Navigation
View posts	[+24]	[+48]	[+96]

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search: