/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10712902
The idea that a game which sells once every two months is somehow a better indicator of market conditions than a game which sells five a day is really funny. Less data is better when you're trying to delude yourself, I guess. Also, citing a single game going down is about as retarded as saying the NASDAQ is going to crash because Hasbro stock is in the shitter. Anyways, I looked at some similarly priced TurboGrafx games with similar price points and sales volume (Ys III, Camp California, and Dragon Slayer if you're curious): they're all trending flat to upwards. Even funnier, the outlier you decided to use as an example is still priced higher than it was pre-COVID.

Here's the TurboGrafx chart, by the way. Best to avoid cherry picking, don't you think?

>>10712921
This is actually true, and something to keep in mind. That said, it's not going to be a market factor until we're about dead. At which point I can't see myself caring all that much.