/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10493504
Every single argument for Sonic being "bad" is nonsense cope from Mario tards.

>you just go fast and win, its too simple
>you can't go fast and win, its too hard
Every time without fail they show their absolute lack of an argument because their only arguments are contradictory.

Fact is, Mario fans will never get over feeling like a dork who likes a lameass series. And they're right. It's like a Smurfs fan screeching about how Ninja Turtles sucks because they resent people moving on to something that makes them feel lame in comparison.

>>10039241
Well, some people like to pretend Mario games are for an older audience than they are. But the truth is, Mario games are for kids about 3-5, while Sonic is more like 6-13

>>9594747

>>7703850
Nintoddlers always have to sock a cuck
When in their life did it everything go amuck?
A Nintoddler is never at peace
This creep took naked photos of a niece

>>7191991
Nah, peopled liked Sonic games because they were breathtaking action platformers that had mind blowing physics engine never before seen in video games, as if pinball itself became adapted into the platform genre. It's fucking brilliant, on top of the amazing timeless rocking music, great story, beautiful graphics, and loads of character and charm, you're simply a faggot if you don't like Sonic and simply a retard if you don't have a blast playing his classic games. Sonic is way passed cool, and you're way passed being a fucking faggot.

I don't really get the same enjoyment out of other platformers that I get from Sonic

>>6518092