/vr/ - Retro Games

>>10124293
I wouldn't say removed so much as cordoned off. There are still erotic games (Rance et al.) and lewd games (Senran Kagura, Gal Gun, Oneechanbara, Disgaea, many others) but games that don't fall into these categories are being scrubbed clean.
In 2006 we got a female Pokemon protagonist in a leotard and now we can't even get one in a skirt. Lara Croft's jiggle is gone along with the rest of her boobs. An outfit that was fine for Fire Emblem 14 in 2015 is censored in Smash Bros. 4 in 2016.
The problem isn't with any of these specific examples. They might be disappointing as individual changes, but what's concerning is the larger trend they represent.
I like eroge and I like games that are lewd, but I also like games made for everyone that happen to have cute, sexy girls in them.
In the 90's you could make a game that wasn't about sex and didn't focus on sex but still had amazing babes being amazing, and everyone was okay with this. Nowadays games like that are being censored constantly. Skullgirls was dragged out to the altar just this past month.
I don't like this trend and I don't pay money for games that I think are a part of this trend, so more and more I end up here, talking and playing retro games. I love me some old games but I want to be more excited about the new stuff than I am.

>>10102129
>im a musician so its not "playable" if the audio is mangled
I'd suggest watching some youtube reviews. I don't know much about the RG505 other than it's considered decent. The RG35XX is generally considered to have better audio than the MM+, however both devices use a single tiny mono speaker so I wouldn't call either of them good. Headphones would help, but I'm not sure about the audio emulation quality as I'm tone deaf. My singing was so crappy, I was kicked off of the church choir at age 12.

Also see below for the RG35XX vs MM+ breakdown, or just watch the Retro Game Corps youtube review.
>>10100745