[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/vr/ - Retro Games

Search:


View post   

>> No.2040696 [View]
File: 255 KB, 3200x1000, 1413937651865.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2040696

>>2040652
>>2040660
>You're such a great english speaker that you also made tons of mistake

Yeah, I also made tons of mistake, not mistakes mind you, just tons of mistake.

>Because the RGB sync go through some kind of amplifier, that the simple composite cable doesn't have.

Wow. So instead of making the composite go through the amplifier so we can get the sharpest picture what do we do, we just let the sync go through that snowflakey deus ex machina because god knows why. I opened my RGB cable, there was absolutely nothing, not even half a capacitor. Just cables going straight from the source to the SCART end.

How about no.

> would you think they were going to go through the trouble of having multiple kind of picture rendering just to please the fortunate people who own an RF/Composite only monitor?
Uh, yes. Since you hid yourself behind that whole amplifier thing I cannot try to argue myself out of this. Pic related can, though. I wonder why those pixels in the first column evade them chroma/luma squabbling, I really do. Fucking RGB man, always messing with my blurry composite, you just can't win.

>Yeah, because ALL tubes use the exact same kind of phosphor and the exact same aperture grid or shadow mask?
No, but to go from different technology in general and "ONE IS BLUR ONE IS DON'T" is a little big gap for you to make, at least realize this. PC monitors can be as blurry as your next TV. This is why I told you to give me your definition of "sharp".

>It's a well known fact that 15kHz monitors produce a less sharp picture than PC monitors

Horizontal sync has nothing to do with a picture being sharp or not.

>> No.2019897 [View]
File: 282 KB, 3200x1000, rgb vs composite.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2019897

>>2019784
Here is your source. Forgive picture quality and for bending the second.

See the dithered pattern when the picture starts? If you're going to average two pixels at a time, you don't have a starting couple for the first column of pixels (the border, at best), so this little quirk gives away the trick they supposedly used. Also notice the spot where two pixels are the exact same, if it really was cheap encoding they would have been affected if only a little, but perfectly logical when you're trying to interpolate two exact same colors.

Will we finally end the argument?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]