/vr/ - Retro Games

>>5824173
That's honesty how I feel about this.
It's all just an effort to dissipate the asshurt from trannies.
The 1.0 version is backed up in the mega (I'll be sure to mark it as such, when a patch releases.) You can most likely keep the same .grp file with an updated engine just fine, the ONLY thing that will be permanently effected is multiplayer.

>>5809729
It's called newfags. Anyone who's lurked for longer than a week knows that every fucking answer to these retarded "hurr what's the best way to play X" is either whatever the current emulation option is for that system, or real hardware on a CRT.
IT HAS NEVER FUCKING CHANGED SINCE THE BOARD'S FUCKING INCEPTION
WHY ISN'T THIS INFO (along with my other favorites like what handheld is best for emulation, where to get ROMs, and recommendation lists) IN THE FUCKING STICKY ALREADY
90% OF THIS BOARD'S ISSUES WOULD GO AWAY IF WE HAD A /fit/ LIKE STICKY WE COULD BANISH RETARDS TO
FUCKING MODS FUCK YOU

>>5748809
Passion
Consumers didn't know what they liked, marketing (or lack thereof) was everything.
Games still required a studio to make, but each release wasn't profitable enough to warrant fuckhuge teams, so every game had a team of like 10 people throwing shit at the wall to see what stuck. They also weren't designed by focus groups.
Games came out like gangbusters Shotgun theory, if that's the phrase.

I don't know. I like games from every era, but retro stuff just has a greater appeal to me. I feel like the games "respect" me more as a player than as a consumer. I do think people who only play retro stuff are weird though, modern classics like Gravity Rush or Demon's Souls are what I'd include in a the "video game canon" if that were a thing.

>>5748915
>hipsters
is it 2012? The modern phrase for poser is "faggot."

>>5738895
>tfw you're older than anon's dad