/vr/ - Retro Games

>>9054260
Yes, pretty much everyone knows the physics are different. No, no one fucking cares. Except you.

For anyone who's new to this particular piece of /vr/ bullshit, this thread was started by an autistic asshat known locally as the "assembly language larper" in order to put out some bait that's meant to look like a zoomer kid foolishly asking how to make a video game. There is no correct response to the OP. No matter how you respond to the bait, you're going to get met with snide, condescending remarks calling you a zoomer and a larper who doesn't know anything. This is meant to suck you in to a shitposting session. This particular autist has been doing this for years now, and shows no signs of letting up.

Your only real advantage here (other than just not engaging) is the fact that he isn't actually a programmer himself, as evidenced by the very first thread he appeared in.
https://desuarchive.org/vr/thread/4458748/
He still hasn't bothered to learn anything in the years that followed, so if you do actually know what you're talking about he'll usually back off when he realizes it. If you're as full of shit as he is, though, you're going to be at it for hours. We're all going to laugh at you both. Just saying.

>>6433061
>this is how far i go to justify my shitposting addiction

>>4526167
Oh, I don't deny that I'm here shitposting it up like a spider monkey on crack. I so totally am. I'm just not "the shitposter" (which I'm assuming he's saying to refer to the guy who called him a larper in another thread) he thinks I am.

An entire thread of hipsters, having spent years using "PSX" to refer to the original Playstation in order to seem cool to other hipsters, are now confused by the fact that the OP is referring to the actual PSX and not the PS1's development name.

>>3582870
>well, i guess there was one game i really liked, but then my favorite eceleb told me why i shouldn't

I will never understand how a person can have their opinion completely dictated to them by a talking head on YouTube.

>>3412480
>the retro rule should be any game 18 years of age or older instead of cutoff dates between console gens
No, because this would make some sort of sense, and that isn't going to fly here. Autism says unless a console/game/whatever existed in the so-called "golden age" of gaming, it can be 100 years old and not be considered retro.

This is what the average fucktard on this board actually believes. Let that sink in.

>>3124878
>Encouraging faggotry