/vr/ - Retro Games

>>1106703
>Bullshit. All the games that have been mentioned have been addressed
>THIS GAME EXISTS ON NES THEREFORE IT NEVER EXISTED ON C64
>HERE'S WHY THE GAME IS BAD: IT SUCKS AND I HATE IT
I wouldn't call that addressing.
>A lot of the games that are considered the best on the C64 are also on the NES.
Yeah, no. You're missing a fuckton m8.
>The ones that are not mostly don't measure up to the best of the NES
>IT SUCKS
>AND I HATE IT
>The NES has better exclusives.
>"Muh exclusives" count: 37453.
>It's not even fucking close
You're right, it was stupid to think that the NES could ever be on the same level as C64, it's just so inferior.
>Seriously, what's next, an Atari 2600 vs NES thread?
Yeah, you should go make one, you'd actually win that time and maybe you'd even finally feel superior to something.