/vr/ - Retro Games

>>4720979
Mickey Mouse goes around doing acrobatic/parkour moves?

>>4638967
Is that screenshot supposed to probe anything?
Look at that monochrome background, unacceptable.
I like the detail of the Mega Drive there, though.

Capcom

>>3388297

I played the game, both Genesis and PC DOS versions (the later sucks).
Virgin's game is not bad, but the platforming is not tight. On the Capcom game the bouncing mechanic adds a real acrobatic sense to the game.
The only time I felt there was any difficult on the platforming for Genesis Aladdin was the palace level, because sometimes the hit detection for landing on these floating plants was off and I'd fall in the water, but other than that it was a pretty standard western platformer/action game. Nice sprite animations, but beyond that there was nothing really that interesting.

>>3297764

Haha, hey again bro.

It's not cherry picked and I still think the backgrounds on the Capcom game are much more detailed and better crafted than the bgs on the Virgin game.
But I don't hate the Virgin game, as I said many times, I had both as a kid and enjoyed both, I just think the Capcom game is better due to better controls, but we know we'll never agree with each other.

At the end of the day, they're both different games though, not a multiplat title like what OP intended to discuss.

For the Virgin game, the Genesis version is better than the PC version though.

>>3171204

I'll take the acrobatic gymnast, makes gameplay better.

>>2879218

>Capcom Aladdin
>clunky controls

lol

>>2850545

Not just one level, pretty much every level on Capcom's game has a more detailed and polished backgrounds than on the Virgin game.

I can accept Virgin's game has better sprite animations, why can't you accept that Capcom made better backgrounds?