/vr/ - Retro Games

>>2856082
>designed around RF

LCDfags confirmed blind

>>2856084
Gee it's almost like they were trying to show it to a crowd or something

>>2856212
Because displaying pixels is abstract, they have no choice but to use squares. So in case you forgot: Calendars aren't video games. That calendar may have been designed like that, but I would also argue whomever designed that calendar is not the original artist that created the original sprites >on a CRT<. Nice false positive though.

>>2856241
>The blending people perceive is a visual trick, but it's not actually adding anything.

Yeah that's the point.

>It's exactly the same as adding noise.

No it's not. It's literally having less picture so your mind completes it for you. That's like the opposite of noise.

They may not be necessary, but CRTs are simply superior. Stop being butthurt over other people's superior setups and either accept your mediocrity or get educated and join the conversation.

Let me spell this out for anyone that can't seem to understand: Scan lines don't magically add extra pixels or makes it higher resolution. What they will do is blend the existing image to create implied clarity over sharp LCD pixels..

>>2852658
Look at these two. Ignoring the obvious color difference, note the left cheek, where the light is shining. Can you see every individual pixel that makes up the shading on the left? You can? What about on the left? What's that, it's harder? It looks more natural? That's because scan lines blend the edges of the pixels. I honestly want someone to try and disprove this; I mean, this is just how light works: unless contained to a specific spot, light will bleed and leak (in varying amounts depending on your set).

tl;dr they don't think it be like it is, but it do