/vr/ - Retro Games

>>4257542
You have assumed completely and fundamentally wrong things about the very basis of my motivations which necessarily leads to you being wildly, even comically far off target with your attacks based on those assumptions.

Furthermore, I think you are making fundamentally wrong assumptions about not just why some anons choose to tripfag (to become "cult leaders"? seriously? lol) but even on the reason most anons are anons.

I'm sorry that you can't just ignore the small fact that I've chosen to pseudonymously sign my posts on /vr/. I'm sorry that just because it references my age - in what even I took as a negative euphamism when anon originally referred to me with it. I don't act like my age gives me some kind of objective authority on all matters. Sometimes I forget something like Channel F - especially since it was before my time. I might have shared a childhood experience instead like I did in that 99/4a thread but you derailed THAT thread because I simply used the word "we" to refer to my family and yes, I recognize your writing style from thread to thread.

No. I am not "appealing to age", which isn't even a thing. I am sharing my experiences and perspectives and participating in discussion. When I'm actually wrong like itt, I own it but during my adolescence and young adulthood I was all about this shit and I am very confident in my memory and that the things I say about the console video game scene in the 90s and even the late 80s stand up to full scrutiny. So much so that I sign them. Maybe my warming toward the moniker "gramps" was somewhat related to the agedfag wave of 2016- and I'm sure just that alone is enough to burn your biscuits ten more threads' worth at least.