/vr/ - Retro Games

>>1604831

>Dude it plays nothing like a fighting game and plays almost exactly like old AC games without missions/parts, various other games play almost identical to Virtual On too with the same setup and format.
>Its not a fighting game.

Oh is that your argument now? A wikipedia definition rather than a logical set of fundamental rules, state and actions?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fighting_games

And it plays nothing like old AC games because Armored Core is a simulation and not a fighting game. Not to mention that in Armored Core you have to manage your money to repair and buy new parts and weapons. There is no such thing in Virtual On.

Also here's your link to clicking the "Action Game" link in your picture.

"The action game is a video game genre that emphasizes physical challenges, including hand–eye coordination and reaction-time. The genre includes diverse subgenres such as fighting games, shooter games and platform games which are widely considered the most important action games, though some real-time strategy games are also considered to be action games."

Read the part where it says it includes diverse subgenres as FIGHTING GAMES.

Not once have you even addressed my points and relevant statements I made about Virtual On being a fighting game but rather you've tried to sidestep the issue.