/vr/ - Retro Games

>>6048097
>It's debunking the claim made every day here that CRTs have less motion blur than LCDs.
They do in general. Only certain gaming monitors (that are all TN panels, meaning worse colors, viewing angles, black levels) have 1ms response times. And the fastest input lag an LCD has achieved is 9ms.

Also, the claimed 1ms response times are gray-to-gray, and this is the number manufacturers use in their marketing. It's kind of like amplifier manufacturers claiming "2000 watts!" when the test was done using only a 1khz signal and measured peak rather than RMS.

Gray-to-gray is still used for these claims. See here. https://displaylag.com/gaming-monitor-database/

>Display manufacturers know that going from black-to-white takes longer than it does for it to go from gray-to-gray. It makes more sense for them to advertise the fastest number, because it makes the display look more attractive in the consumer’s eyes.

>Few LCDs can match/beat the benefits of a CRT in certain departments (motion blur), and it's extremely hard to get similar benefits on an LCD -- you need to raise Hz to compensate for the more harsh squarewave strobing of an LCD, but you also need to raise GPU horsepower to match the higher Hz -- and few monitors produce near-zero strobe crosstalk like a CRT can, without getting degraded colors or other artifacts such as inversion artifacts.

https://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5787