/vr/ - Retro Games

>>1969710
It is not necessarily a good term because it is 32 years old. I also can't take anyone seriously who cites Wikipedia. Isn't it convenient that the article in question is an editorial mess and the source cites an unavailable document!

>>1969719
As you mentioned, that is a specific technique that doesn't necessarily represent even a minority of /vr/ games.

This is the kind of vaguery that flourishes when people apathetically toss around buzzwords. We should have better terms than "pixellated graphics" and a more precise method of describing pretty screenshots of /vr/ games.

>>1969734
>Not all drawings require a raster display.
Forgot to mention that raster graphics are not necessarily /vr/-related as well. And of course that usage implies a disinterest in vector graphics, which are traditionally considered 2D.