/vr/ - Retro Games

>>5130975
Nope, actually i have "21/20" vision, i'm just not revising history

>>5131043
I have no idea who you're talking about, but i'm not making this up. You ever wonder why crt's flicker when filmed whereas LCD's don't? LCD has a far more persistent image which is nicer on the eyes, and people in general respond to. I can't believe this is so controversial. A few years back some LCDs had PWM backlights causing flickering and that was giving people headaches, and the flicker was nowhere near as intense as CRTs.

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/154193120104500315
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3592304/
>It was also observed that the eyestrain, redness, itching, burning and double vision were less when the subjects used LCD monitors instead of CRT monitors, but a significant association was found only with eye strain [Table/Fig-3]. The CRT monitors have to be replaced with flat-panel LCD screens. The LCD screens are easier on the eyes and they usually have an anti-reflective surface. The images on the CRT monitors can “flicker”, which can cause eye strain [19].

I googled for 2 minutes and found about 10 articles like these two. As i said originally, LCD adoption was not merely about cost reduction, that is revisionist horseshit or perhaps LCD adoption through the eyes of a zoomer.