[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
[ERROR] No.27492618 [Reply] [Original] [4plebs] [archived.moe]

new to 40k, so I was reading some lore and then some person made some fanstuff Story:Love Can Bloom

did that stuff become canon or semi canon?

>> No.27492633

It got a reference at one point actually.

>> No.27492653

that is pretty cool, thought gw would send them a lawsuit

>> No.27492691

Oh that story...I think the smut fags are writing a ton of LIIVI-Taldeer fapfics now. Nice to see nowadays.

>> No.27492714

no not even remotely fuck you no

>> No.27492715

Meh, non commercial fanfiction generally doesn't get sued because:
1. The actual legalities involved are pretty murky
2. You really aren't getting harmed by it (which makes suing more difficult)
3. Suing your fans generally isn't the best business strategy, especially given 1 and 2.

>> No.27492762

I want to read it but it might be heresy? what do you say brothers?

>> No.27493124

it is not even the SLIGHTEST bit canon

>> No.27494736

I feel like there was a mention of it in some sourcebook, just like the dark heresy story about the knife wielding priest who killed daemons out of sheer luck.

Quick google search and tvtropes confirmed it, but no picture and I'm too lazy to go dig through books.

>> No.27494776

Stop being a fag. That's what they should tell you, unless they are also fags.

It's kind of ambivalent. FFG seems to think it's canon.

Dark Heresy: Ascension.

>> No.27494848


What? where?

>> No.27494855


>> No.27494885


Shit sorry.

On the phone I thought the thread just started.

Refreshed and found out.

Thanks anyway!

>> No.27494919

...It's a long story.

By the by, why the fuck has this shit persisted for SIX YEARS?

>> No.27494942

It's just nod to fans. How does this make LCB canon?

Seems to me the assassin is gonna blow the Farseer head off as he should.

>> No.27494992

He took the time to get to point-blank range ON A TELEPATH WHO CAN ALSO SEE THE FUTURE, just to blow her brains out using a gun that is notorious for it's long range?

Are you really that retarded?

>> No.27494995

From that close?

And the farseer doesn't have a helmet?

But yes, it's just a nod to fans. Not canon.

Although amusingly enough, the weight for the exitus rifle in the fanfic and in the stats page of the FFG book are both 9kg.

>> No.27495018


Bonuses for Short Range and Point Blank, dog.

>> No.27495048

>implying Vindicators don't count as point-blank any-fucking-way.

>> No.27495075




There is no canon in 40k. Just things that GW hasn't contradicted yet.

>> No.27495161

He pursuing the target and since when do the Elderp foresight have worked as intended?

>> No.27495184

A lot more often than your grammar does.

>> No.27495207

Then they are DOOMED!

>> No.27495363

...Is it on 1d4chan?

>> No.27497249

Why has no one taken it up on themselves to finish this damn thing?

>> No.27500094


that is were I read it

>> No.27500454

Nobody feels like they're up to the task. Sort of like Kafka and The Trial.

>> No.27500937

So did Boone and Grendel. And Xeno, in a roundabout way.

>> No.27500963

Theres even one where Lofn is spying on them going at it.

>> No.27500981

Half-eldars were canon for a while, so its got that going for it. And Farseers are known for making terrible decisions, like falling in love with an autistic monkeigh sniper.

>> No.27500993

Her hair is the wrong color, though. I'm surprised no one ever points that out.

>> No.27502086

Somebody was willing to take it upon themselves to produce Macha losing her virginity, surely someone could do this?

>> No.27502387

If I remember right the writer actually finished it. It's just no one ever recorded it, I could be off however.

>> No.27502426

So people claim.

>> No.27502494

That, and there's sort of a hesitancy to add to things that aren't yours.

>> No.27505101

>And Xeno, in a roundabout way.
Pics or it didn't happen.

>> No.27506714

That's totally different. We're talking about adding something completely new to a beloved work of writefaggotry which could go wrong very easily and is likely to stand out from the rest of it like a sore thumb. Plus, there's the existence of several spinoffs that in many cases are mutually irreconcilable and as such ould be bound to annoy someone if one set or another was deemed non-canon. Best not mess with it unless the original writer returns (and the chances of that are near zero).

>> No.27507015



Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.