Op was asking for opinions on stereotypes like. He didn't stated that it was his opinion or let it implied in any way. He shows however that he's a newfag, both for asking this question and for not knowing this stereotype has been debunked many times. I see no intentional trolling here; it might as well be though, given the rants.
I have heard this shit three or four times before, as women are supposed to have more empathy because of their biologically superior understanding of social dynamics,
>they SHOULD be better roleplayers, but this is bullshit.
Girls who roleplay aren't in an open social situation, they're using their imagination to live in a simulated social environment. It wouldn't make much of a difference except they intuitively realize they can be whatever they want and break the setting using its own rules. This will lead to one of three scenarios:
-Egotistical girls will try to be mary sue somehow, or coerce the table unto doing their will from a subconscious level of thought; as they're not really interacting, empathy losses all significance because it's no longer useful, so it's discarded in favor of a self rewarding, short term approach.
>Example, stereotypical evil hambeast playing vampire.
-Girls who aren't egotistical much but don't know how to play, will try to able everything for everyone forever. You'll find them in the most grimdark fucked up setting trying to speak with radioactive rats and butcher rabbits, coloring flowers and frolicking. They may cry when things go in unexpected routes because they still see this as an opportunity to make their wishes come true. They might win the badass, rough player to their side, and might be cool to have in your table, note that these two tend to exclude one another.
>Example: Sisbard (female counterpart of brobard) in D&D, Druid, Robin Hood Scum.