Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
[ERROR] No.19586370 [Reply] [Original] [4plebs] [archived.moe]

What does /tg/ think about Ogryns?

>> No.19586378

>>19586370

/tg/ is tired of yet another 40k thread. Ask it one of the dozens floating around here.

>> No.19586393

>>19586370
They're good at peeling potatoes.

>> No.19586413

>>19586393
Only because they like potato peels.

Is it heretical that they peel potatos for the potato peels instead of peeling potatoes for the emprah?
Should they be re-educated?

>> No.19586434

>>19586393
No, silly, that's Ratlings.

Ogryn would have problems just picking up potato without smashing it.

>> No.19586449

Anyone here have experience using them? I got a few for painting but haven't used them yet in a game.

>> No.19586486

>>19586378
>/tg/ is tired of yet another 40k thread. Ask it one of the dozens floating around here.

Oh, you speak with the voice of /tg/ now? I don't remember this decision. And there's only a single fucking 40k thread besides this one. Why don't you try complaining about the 7+ quest threads or the troll-sticky at the top? Do something fucking useful, Madam Voice.

>> No.19586489

>>19586434
So it is you who needs to be re-educated.
But this time
educate yourself.

http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Gav_and_Bob

Ave Bob.
Ave Arry.
Ave Tarla.

>> No.19586498

>>19586489
Fuckin' Ave.

>> No.19586509

>>19586486
There are three on the first two pages.

Personally I don't like quest threads or 40k threads, but you shouldn't utter such an easily check-able falsehood.

>> No.19586525

>you will never be carried in the hulking but gentle arms of your Ogryn husbandu

>> No.19586532

Is it just me, or does this ogryn look like the Heavy Weapons Guy from Team Fortress 2?

>> No.19586575

>>19586532
Just you. Heavy weapon guy is more of a ''Try again Bragg" type. That said, Heavy Weapon Ogryn does sound like a fun conversion. . .

>> No.19586643

>>19586509
There are TWO. This one, which won't last very long because it's a joke thread and the one for the revealing of 6E, which won't get a sticky because god forbid a thread about an edition release for the game the board was created for be on the first page. Because aspies like you will fucking spurg out. Yet it's hunky-fucken'-dory for a bunch of fucking animu quest threads and quest threads that are in 100+ chapters and can't even be fucken' joined by an outsider anymore. Oh, and lets not forget the gender troll thread that's got a fucking sticky. But no. You complain about the 2 40k threads, kid.

>> No.19586799

>>19586643
OP here. I didn't intend for this to be a joke thread. I'm dead serious about what /tg/ thinks about Ogryns. Hence why I asked in a later post if anyone has used them.

>> No.19586876

>>19586799
Terrible on tabletop, which is sad, coz they're awesome.

>> No.19586943

>>19586876
Are they really that bad? Yeah they're overpriced, but do they not have viable roles?

>> No.19586969

>>19586943
Honestly, it seems in the next edition you'd be better off buying a fortification and using it for the same role as opposed to the lovable-lumps.

>> No.19587009

>19586643

This one.
>>19582467
>>19584518

COUNT MOTHERFUCKER

I'm also not the person you were talking to earlier, so most of your post is nonsense.

>> No.19587012

>>19586943
Nothing that can't be done better and cheaper by other units' The problem is the same as flash gitz. Too much price for not enough substance.

>>19586969
Depending on the changes they might get better. Not good, but usable.

>> No.19587019

>>19586969
B-but they're so endearing. I've been considering buying a 3rd army (maybe Eldar), but at work today I came up with the stupid but amusing idea of buying 30 Ogryns for 3 full Ogryn squads instead of a new army. God help me, I may actually do it.

>> No.19587062

>>19587019
If you do it, make sure you convert a Bob and 'Arry, etc. You'll be /tg/'s hero.

Also, it won't be good atm, but with GW's flipping on power levels, next codex they might get buffed something chronic. More also, against that, I'd play with something like by rebel grot horde or some such. Viva da revvulushun!

>> No.19587111

>hey, do we really need another 40k thread
>WHATS THE MATTER HUH? TOO MUCH 40K FOR YA! YOU FUKKEN MAD BRO?

lol dem 40kiddos

>> No.19587135

>>19587111
>Complaining about 40k threads inside a 40k thread on a board which was originally made for 40k.
Go back to /v/, we discuss games on /tg/.

>> No.19587154

>>19587062
I'm reading Gav and Bob for the first time now. I'll try and think of some conversion ideas. I've never used green stuff, though.

>> No.19587182

>>19587154
Start simple, work your way up.

>> No.19587315

>>19587019
There's an Apoc formation that's works like that. Somebody may have the scans of it. It may even be up by the time I post this.

>> No.19587336

>>19587009
>linking to threads that aren't in the first two pages as the person originally layed out.
so now you aren't even going to maintain uniformity in how you bitch? sure showed me. good going, kid.

>> No.19587349

>>19587336
ever hear of an active board?

>> No.19587364

>>19587111
anybody have that comic that shows how a person will present the side of the argument they agree with as a level-headed everyman while the opposing side is presented as a raving lunatic?

>> No.19587378

>>19587364
I believe that's the I'M SILLY argument

>> No.19587380

>>19587349
ever here of warhammer wednesday?

>> No.19587386

>>19587380
*hear

>> No.19587399

>>19587380
>here
ha ha ha, just how POOR do you even have to be

>> No.19587411

>>19587399
already corrected the mistake, kid.
>picking at spelling mistakes on the internet as though it completely invalidates the post

>> No.19587415

>>19587380
And this has to do with... what?

You have to remember, I am responding originally to this.

>>19586486
>And there's only a single fucking 40k thread besides this one.

That's straight up retarded.

I countered by counting the 40k threads on the first two pages. The fact that the first two pages changes over time... means what (in relation to this point of contention)?

>> No.19587429

>>19587411
>getting phanny flustered at a little jape
damn friend you must really be upset.

>> No.19587442

>>19587429
I like the constant use of 'kid' as his way of feeling above everyone.

>> No.19587445

>>19586643
>the game the board was created for
I don't see why 40k players always want to remind everyone that they were kicked out of /b/.

>> No.19587453

>>19587415
Not mad, just putting it in caps so you can read it.
GO
DO
SOMETHING
PRODUCTIVE
GO BITCH ABOUT THE FUCKING ANIMU QUEST THREADS WHERE THE FAGGOTS TRY TO HAVE SEX WITH THEIR IMAGINARY CHARACTERS.
GO BITCH ABOUT THE QUEST THREADS THAT ARE 100+ CHAPTERS IN THAT NOBODY CAN JUST JOIN ANYMORE.
COMPLAIN ABOUT THE TERRIBLE FUCKING MOD THAT HAS A TROLL STICKY.
/tg/ WAS MADE FOR WARHAMMER. THE FACT THAT YOU GET TO TALK ABOUT YOUR GAMES IS A SIGN OF US UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU NEED A PLACE TO TALK ABOUT IT TOO. FUCK.
Not mad, just putting it in caps so you can read it.

>> No.19587468

>>19587453
Obv mad.

>> No.19587484

>>19587468
Aight, I'm a little mad. I'll admit it.

>> No.19588537

Guys guys GUYS. Dis is a thread fer Ogryns. Can't we be nice to eachotha, fer da Emprah?

>> No.19588842

>>19586643

what did you get banned from whineseer?

why discuss GW on a board that is openly hostile to it?

>> No.19588855

>>19588842
Because that ``openly hostile" bit is exactly what is in contention, I'd hazard.

>> No.19588876

>>19588855

i play GW, but I stick to GW boards

because I recognize how much an absurd rip-off and the fact that the other game options out there are better so I stick to GW boards

there's simply no defending GW anymore to non-GW types because *breaking news* they're RIGHT

we are retarded to keep propping these tyrants up with our money

>> No.19588970

>>19588876
And as was previously mentioned, /tg/ is the Warhammer 40k board in a very real sense.

I've heard several times before that /tg/ is /d/-lite. This is an apt comparison in another respect: /d/ was created to get the dickgirls off of /h/. People there whine about the prevalence of dickgirls. And nothing changes. Hell, the 40k ``infestation" here is nothing compared to the dickgirl profusion there, and yet people still bicker and complain about Warhams on the Warhams board. It makes no sense.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action