Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
[ERROR] No.16178548 [Reply] [Original] [4plebs] [archived.moe]

ITT: we discuss costumes in fantasy media and dump as many pics of armor cleavage as possible.

so /tg/, besides Prince of Persia what are some other big offenders when it comes to focusing entirely on the T&A?

I just remember playing the Warrior Within, and literally the first memorable shot was of Shahdee's ass. Even as a 14 year old I could figure out why they'd want to provide fanservice like that.

Pic related, its dat ass.

>> No.16178556

>> No.16178570

The weird thing is, I don't even find that sexy. But the stuff from Sands of Time? Hot.

>> No.16178600

>>16178570
You mean Farah?

>> No.16178636

>>16178570
Yeah, i love it when women shoot you in the back and say "sorry"

>> No.16178641

>> No.16178645

>>16178548
Oh god I remember dat ass. Such boners were had.

>>16178600
This was a real woman though. God Farrah was hot and didn't even need to dress like a whore

>> No.16178649

Perhaps magic is powered by T&A?

>> No.16178662

I still lol a little every time I think of Warrior Within.

>> No.16178671

>>16178636
Hey, at least she said sorry. It's more than you usually get.

>> No.16178675

>>16178548
I love it when they part just so they can all watch her walk by

>> No.16178677

Let's not forget DMC

>> No.16178689

>T&A
>offenders

>> No.16178696

>>16178677
And here's Trish

>> No.16178699

>>16178649
I decided I am going to create a world where magic runs entirely on T&A. The more visible cleavage a sorceress has, the more powerful she will be.

MY GOD.

>> No.16178702

>> No.16178709

>> No.16178710

>>16178699
What if she's naked?

And what about male mages?

>> No.16178712

>>16178702
Penny arcade-ish.

Can't really tell

>> No.16178713

>>16178696

and bayonetta.

>> No.16178731

>>16178713
LADY!

>> No.16178732

>>16178548
Sad part is, Warrior Within had the best gameplay, yet shittiest costume and characterization. Sands of Time had awesome characterization and the costumes were decent, but the combat got old fairly fast - and yes, this *WAS* a game of both combat as well as platforming.

Two Thrones... let's not go there. Whoever came up with these bosses needs to be fired and barred from vidya for all eternity.

>> No.16178738

>>16178710
Man-cleavage.

The more pecs you have, the more powerful you are. As a warrior or mage.

>> No.16178741

>>16178738
I guess that works

>> No.16178744

>>16178738
Works for me!

>> No.16178758

>>16178732
What about the 2008 game? It was weird and non-canon, and cel-shaded, but I ended up really liking it.

>> No.16178762

>>16178732
Oh, shit. I forgot T&A.

Anyway... There's being sexy while naked (presumably in the company of someone said female char plans to have sexual relations with, from mild to extreme to consensual heterosexual sex in missionary position for the purposes of procreation), and there's dressing in a goddamn practical way.

There are sexy costumes, too, but they're different from what Shahdee exhibits here...

>> No.16178770

>>16178738
I disagree.
The thinner legs you have, the more power.

>> No.16178785

>>16178758
Meh. Too easy platforming with the never-die thing. Plus I wasn't a fan of 1on1 fights. The dual-wields and throwings and crowd controls of Warrior Within tickled my fancy best... Even if I sometimes banged on the table in incoherent rage and screamed in rage every once in a while...

As for "canon", the PoP series already has several canons in it. The original trilogy, for example, is totally different from the Sands of Time trilogy.

>> No.16178806

>>16178785
Yeah the 1on1 fights were annoying as fuck, I avoided them at all cost.

The platforming reminded me almost of like...Sonic Adventure 2.

Well, that explains why I liked it so much.

>> No.16178833

>>16178770

>> No.16178865

Anyone have that one pic of the three female warriors, two in reasonable full-body plate, and a third in a chain-bikini? The two reasonable ones turn to each other, and one says 'I say we kill her just on principle'.

>> No.16178866

>>16178738
I think it should work the same way as with women

Huge man-boobs = Huge power

>> No.16178874

>>16178758

One thing I really liked about this game was the dynamic between the Prince and whatsherface. Not just the scripted back-and-forth, but the little details, like how the Prince would help her down from a climb.

Sometimes I wonder if that could be expanded upon. Make an entire game where you play two characters who help / support each other like that.

>> No.16178881 [DELETED] 

>>16178866

>> No.16178882

>>16178865

>> No.16178890

>>16178881
THE POWAH

>> No.16178895

>>16178866
Behold the greatest mage in all the land: Seamus McMantits.

No one knows what his face look like, as it is buried beneath his enormous torso.

>> No.16178908

>>16178881
That man is greatly respected as a shaman and healer of his people.

>> No.16178938

>>16178874
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_over_Heels_(video_game)
Already done.

>>16178895
Muscle Wizard!

>> No.16178976

In D&D one could make a Muscle Wizard base class, using CON/STR instead on INT.

Using the power of your muscles you bend the very fabric of the universe to your whim.

>> No.16178990

>>16178758

It has the best setting IMO: so colorful and full of life, dem landscapes, dat soundtrack...and the combat system was somewhat appealing if you were into hit-em-ups and things like that. Shame the characters behaved like hipsters...despite that, I think Elika was really cool.

>> No.16179022

>>16178874
>Sometimes I wonder if that could be expanded upon. Make an entire game where you play two characters who help / support each other like that.
Sup.

>> No.16179033

>>16178990
WE'RE SO DEEP AND MOODY BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Yeah the bosses were cool, the environments were amazing, and the platforming was sound.

Too bad the enemies sucked and the dialogue was so...meh.

>> No.16179040

>>16178882
>>I say we rape her mercilessly just on principle .
>>Fix'd

>> No.16179067

>>16179022
I said "help each other", not "one has to protect and ensure safe passage for the other".

>> No.16179080

>> No.16179081

>>16178990
Honestly, I liked SoT soundtrack best. Dat Mid-East vibe in "action" music and the subdued ambient in quiet platforming scenes.

And then they had to go replace it with Godsmack...

>> No.16179084

>>16179067

'sup

>> No.16179094

>>16179081

"Ive told you this once before cant control me
If you try to take me down youre gonna break
I feel your having nothing that youre doing for me
Im thinkin you are a fake, you are that way
I stand alone
Inside I stand alone."

that's deep poetry, dude

>> No.16179126

>>16179022

I can't hear you over how lost in space I am.

Also: Lemmings.

>> No.16179180

>>16179126

FUK YEAR, LEMMINGS!

>> No.16179535

>>16178758

Probably the most beautiful game I've ever played, and if I've got 10 hours to play a game before I die, I'd pick that one.

Not that it's my favourite game, not by a long shot, but it's up there. It's got problems, sure, but not the 'You never die!' issue, given that it's mechanically no different from a checkpoint system, just presented in a slightly more reasonable way. But eh, it's clear that presentation of mechanics is vital in this day and age.

>> No.16179569

As for the main topic, I've no problem with T&A really, just as long as it fits the tone of the setting. I wouldn't want to see Brienne of Tarth in bikini armour, for instance, but Red Sonja? Yes please. Red Sonja ain't exactly taking itself seriously.

>> No.16179761

>>16179569
what really puts me off about Sonja is that her outfit is really a costume, like spider man's, batman's or any other modern age hero's. She almost always (depending on who draws her) wears the same scale mail bikini, metal wire pauldrons and gloves with pointless decorative slits on the hems. She travels, fights, gets captured and breaks free all day all year but her outfit never gets damaged. Or are we supposed to believe she commisioned local craftsmen to produce identical, metal bikinis, gloves or boots whenever she wore a pair out? Compare this to Conan: he changed his outfit pretty much every adventure but readers still had no problem recognizing him amongst other characters on the page. It would be even easier with Sonja even if she changed clothes since she's a woman in a male dominated setting.

I saw some recent comic were she wore a chainmail shirt for a change, it was quite nice and still sexy enough since it showed off her legs. In the 80's she dressed like pic related, still sexy as hell but made 100 times more sense than the retarded bikini. Sure, it wasn't metal armor but it must be far more comfortable and easy to mend/replace between battles.

>> No.16179791

>>16178990

The game had it's faults but it was a VERY beautiful and fun to play through at least once.

I love the Prince and Elika's childish bickering but I guess it's not for everybody.

>> No.16179850

>>16179569
True. For example, Jade Empire's equal-opportunity fanservice seems fairly fitting, as it's "just that kind of game" (i mean, seriously... there's only two characters in the WHOLE GAME who ever change their clothes).

Still... if it's pseudo-European and the men are in full plate while women wear chain mail bikini at best and somehow both are equally protective... Well, no.

>> No.16179933

I don't mind T+A in fantasy. It's fantasy.

I'm bored by this: "No way would those shapes be on a breastplate, no way would there be side-butt, because blah blah blah"... It's banal.

That being said, perhaps there are limits. Pic somewhat related.

>> No.16180004

>>16179850
in the best sword & sorcery, men wear harnesses at the most, hard gay style. Or they only wear chainmail shirts so their metal links can be violently and spectacularly torn apart by a strong opponent's overwhelming attack, exposing their broad, sweaty heaving chests...

>> No.16180094

>>16179933
considering how many people have hunted ferocious beasts and fought wars NAKED throughout real human history, I really can't be bothered by any amount of exposed skin in my fantasy material. However, when women wear armour than ONLY exposes their tits and stuff like that, it's just too obviously sexualized and ruins the immersion for me. If a woman rushes into combat wearing only a helmet, sandals and a shield like some depictions of ancient greek warriors, for example, I'm totally OK with it.

>> No.16180154

>>16178548

>> No.16180185

>fanservice

>> No.16180253

>>16180094
I think the problem is when only women dress like that, but the guys are in full armour. Why the fuck can't the women wear full armour?!

>> No.16180314

>>16180253
Girls can wear reasonable battle clothing and still be attractive.

>> No.16180319

They can, but it goes back to "Fantasy so why the fuck not?"

>> No.16180328

>>16180253
yeah, the problem is internal inconsistencies in the game world

>> No.16180435

>>16178770
>The thinner legs you have, the more power.

>> No.16180440

Even in the real world, people fight naked, so why not fantasy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nudity_in_combat

Hell, why are these chicks wearing chainmail bikinis at all? They should fight butt-naked!

>> No.16180455

>>16180314
...unless they're some bug-eyed triangle-faced japanese drawing.

>> No.16180479

>>16180440

The bustier ones should bind their breasts tho.

>> No.16180561

>>16180479
true, to avoid being slapped in the face by their own tits when they leap across the battlefield.

>> No.16180580

>>16180455
>bug-eyed
>triangle-faced

Since when does /tg/ mind these attributes?

>> No.16180583

>>16180440
Fine, then I fully expect cock-waggling naked men too.
>>16180253
This is my problem. Does anyone really buy this shit because "oh god she so hawt man". So this either have to be completely subconious hound-dogging or I am pretty sure the industry wouldn't do it.
To be honest its fucking boring me at this point.

>> No.16180604

What's wrong with fighting naked in fantasy?

The Celts fought butt-naked against the Romans.

Hell, even in the 1990's there were people running into battle naked!

Check out "General Butt Naked":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Blahyi

>> No.16180685

>>16180604
There's a reason the Celts lost.

>> No.16180688

>>16180604
The problem is when men wear 100+ tons of shitty looking armor, and women wear 10oz of armor.e

>> No.16180697

>>16180685
Getting the Romans to build a wall and then leave counts as losing?

>> No.16180733

>>16180697
It doesn't count as winning, either. The Romans stopped their push north because there was fuck all they wanted there.

>> No.16180811

dumping sexiness because I have nothing better to do for an hour

>> No.16180824

>> No.16180832

>>16180685
>Hadrian's Wall
>Scotland and Ireland
butthatswrong.jpg

>> No.16180836

>> No.16180852

>>16180832
Fencing off a ghetto is not a victory for the ghetto, sir.

>> No.16180855

>> No.16180857

>>16180604
>>16180604

LOL! Wow I never heard about General Butt Naked before, that's hilarious!

I can't believe such shit went down in the 90's lol!

>> No.16180863

>> No.16180868

>> No.16180876

>> No.16180882

>>16180832
And which of them lost land, exactly?

Besides, who the fuck wants Scotland or Ireland?

>> No.16180887

>> No.16180894

>> No.16180900

>> No.16180910

>> No.16180918

>> No.16180929

>> No.16180932

>>16178702

"I smolder with generic rage." is one of my favourite PA lines ever.

Seriously spend just 5 seconds thinking about how much shitty writing that can apply to and you'll have an entire page full of examples.

>> No.16180946

>> No.16180960

>> No.16180970

>> No.16180980

>> No.16180989

>> No.16181002

>> No.16181015

>> No.16181035

maybe I should have posted porn instead

>> No.16181056

>impractical

>> No.16181062

>> No.16181072

>> No.16181081

>> No.16181093

>> No.16181103

>> No.16181123

>> No.16181147

>> No.16181149

>> No.16181158

>> No.16181164

>>16180882
See: The troubles, Northern Ireland, 1980s.

>> No.16181168

>> No.16181175

>> No.16181189

>> No.16181194

>>16180882
The English natives lost ground, the Scots and Welsh killed everyone who tried.

The Pictish tribes didn't lose because they fought naked, they lost because the Roman legions were literal killing machines.
The training for a legionnaire consisted of marching in step, stabbing and ripping. They would just walk at the enemy in a long line like a combine harvester. Enemies bash into the shields and are disemboweled.

The primitive armour available at the time was little defence against the mechanics of Roman war, running naked at the enemy, painted blue and stoned out of your skull was one of the best options.

>> No.16181198

>> No.16181207

>> No.16181215

Dammit, what is wrong with my browser?

I'm trying to open the OP pic in a tab so I can save dat ass, but the picture won't load all the way, just a thin strip of the top and the rest is blanked. Refreshing doesn't do anything.

Ideas?

>> No.16181219

>> No.16181242

>>16181215
refresh it, or grow up and find real ass.

>> No.16181253

>> No.16181301

>> No.16181403

>>16181301
There's a shortage of perfect breasts in this world; t'would be a shame to damage yours.

>> No.16181463

>>16181403
What? Did they damage the goods?

>> No.16181528

>>16181215
instead of refreshing, press enter in the address bar so it actually reloads the page.

failing that, right-click-save the image on your computer if it's some weird poltergeist in your browser

>> No.16181621

>>16181194
lol what
having armor helps you survive. Those romans you're talking about...they wore armor, dipshit. Armor helped them survive and win.

>> No.16181654

>>16181621

He's saying that AGAINST the Romans it wasn't much help to wear armour. Can't say how accurate that is but I'm just clearing up the misunderstanding.

>> No.16182006

>>16181654
I know, and I'm pointing out that he's full of shit, because armor helps you live. As evidence, the victorious romans wore it.

>> No.16182898

>>16181654

Yeah, its not accurate at all. They didn't NOT wear armor out of futility, they used it as a shock practice. Gaels were and are still known for it. It was to freak out enemies and the like, and it worked too. For modern similarities, look up the famous 'highland charge'.

Also, chainmail is a celtic invention.

>> No.16182943

>>16182898

>the famous 'highland charge'.

Oh, right, that thing that got the Scots butchered and conquered by England. Again.

>> No.16182961

>>16182006
That's a correlation, not a direct effect. The celts lost against the Romans more because they were less disciplined and disorganized than because they were naked.

>> No.16183015

>>16182961
And because they didn't have armor. And the romans had pilums, and their stabbing style was more effective than the slashes of the celts...
armor is a force multiplier

>> No.16183036

>>16182943

Good job citing the most famous time it didn't work, bro.

How about Killiecrankie, Tippermuir or Falkirk?

By your reasoning, Roman tactics were bullshit due to Crassus' defeat to the Parthians. I mean, he lost the eagle standards too. Fucking pathetic.

>> No.16183208

>>16183015
I just told you why your argument about armor is shit.

See
>that's a correlation, not a direct effect

Dumbass. The celts won many battles against the Romans without armor, and likely would have defeated the campaign had they had better discipline and better organization. The Romans were simply more tactically sound. Just because one side happens to have something covering their balls doesn't mean the win by default.

>> No.16183228

>> No.16183248

A slightly impractical space suit. I'm pretty sure NASA ended up rejecting this design.

>> No.16183261

>> No.16183262

Another NASA reject.

>> No.16183294

Because the best spacesuits have a cup-size.

>> No.16183343

Being naked makes up for the lack of protection with the psychological factor of being unsettling.
Being armoured has also a psychological effect, making the wearer seem invincible to both the foes and himself, and doesn't need to make up for anything.

Just tossing this out.

Look upon my pecs ye mighty and despair, for they were forged by Hephaestus and your puny blades cannot harm them.

>> No.16183359

I think the tops would tend to restrict breathing a bit, but then I'm no combat expert.

>> No.16183448

Here it's not so much the suit that's impractical as it is the way she wears it.

>> No.16183482

You can't convince me that these don't ride up a little.

>> No.16183497

Speaking or riding up...

>> No.16183565

>> No.16183594

>>16183262
>>16183248
Ever play ME2? Ever bring Jack along with you when you went on space walks? She literally just strapped on a helmet and was good to go. Really pissed me off. Yeah I get it, you're a "free spirit" who "doesn't give a shit about clothing standards" but in fucking space, you wear a goddamn space suit.

Alternatively, props to ME2 for fanservice that is composed of small tits rather than melon-sized.

>> No.16183597

>> No.16183602

HISTORICAL!

>> No.16183613

>> No.16183620

>>16183594
>Calling Jack fan service
>Not Miranda
>Or the two alien companions that are from one species entirely composed of hot blue women

>> No.16183633

>>16181215
leave the tab open, clear your Temp Internet files and history, then refresh the tab

>> No.16183634

>>16183602

>> No.16183637

Godddammit where is her belly button.

>> No.16183654

Are you not entertained?

>> No.16183666

>>16183594
>but in fucking space, you wear a goddamn space suit.
Whatever, dad. Unlike you, we're not afraid to try new things.

>> No.16183672

>>16183637
Maybe she came into being through magical means

being an elf and all

>> No.16183674

>>16183637
>implying elves have belly buttons

>> No.16183701

This is exactly the wrong thing to wear if you intend to go tentacle-surfing.

>> No.16183724

Although those boots are to die for, you'll probably die in them if this is what your flight suit looks like.

>> No.16183768

>>16183294

You know what's the funniest shit?

They are!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_activity_suit

>> No.16183830

>>16183768
That's... weird.

>> No.16183844

>>16183768

2suit is better.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2suit

>> No.16183877

>>16183724
Looks like an honorary Strike Witch

>> No.16183924

>>16183877
She's way too old.

>> No.16183985

>>16183602
>armor with engravings of hands throwing the horns
This will definitely be included in the Brutal Legend campaign setting I'm working on.

>> No.16184008

>> No.16184013

>>16183877
Looks like a pair of legs disguised as a human being.
It's obviously just a coat+gloves and wig on a stick.

>> No.16184028

>> No.16184044

>> No.16184092

>> No.16184117

>> No.16184128

General Butt Naked is a dangerous bad-ass...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshua_Blahyi
20,000 people dead at this guys hands..

>> No.16184167

>> No.16184218

>> No.16184231

I'd like to take notice of a character who was sexy but actually didn't go over board into T&A department.
She isn't practicality in for fighting demons but it fit a theme of a modern witch femme fatale.
Just wanted to state what I think is a proper heroine.

>> No.16184234

>> No.16184284

>>16183844
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2suit
>Family versions might expand to 3 or 4suit, for use with undergarments.

>> No.16184295

>> No.16184588

>> No.16184602

>> No.16184613

>this thread

lol thulsa doom you silly negro.

>> No.16184635

>> No.16184669

>> No.16184706

The undead have the worst fashion sense.

>> No.16184728

>> No.16184820

>>16184728
What is this from?

>> No.16184854

>>16184820
I don't have a clue. I think I grabbed it off one of the 4chan boards.

>> No.16184868

>>16184706
I can't not see her weapon as anything but part of a pocketwatch mechanism.

>> No.16184895

I'm supposed to buy that she's a schoolgirl when they'd never let her into the building with that sword?

>> No.16184975

With how effective storm trooper armor seems to be, this is probably an improvement.

>> No.16184991

>> No.16184998

>>16184895

It's a prop from the theater club

>> No.16185004

>women
>combat

You're doing it wrong.

>> No.16185037

>>16184820
>>16184854
It's from Goddanar.

>> No.16185042

>>16184820
Gravion.
I think.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravion

I've seen so many super-robot series now that most kinda blur together.

>> No.16185085

>>16185042
Wait ignore me
>>16185037
Is right.

Like I said, all just a blur these days.

>> No.16185144

>>16185004
>You're doing it wrong.
Or very, very right.

>> No.16185254

>>16183036

Who said anything about combat? This is metal bikinis and huge cleavage.

>> No.16186055

>> No.16186470

>> No.16186486

>> No.16188573 [DELETED] 

>> No.16188721

I just want to make the point that this elf would have been fine if she were wearing bikini armor. Just remember that the next time you go poking fun at how fantasy women dress.

>> No.16188755

>>16188573
her leg's proximity to the blade is greatly alarming

>> No.16188761

>>16179080
HOT DAMN

>> No.16188762

>>16188721

Considering the look on her face, I don't think she wanted the arrow to be stopped.

>> No.16188778

>>16188755
It also should be reported.

>> No.16188819

>>16188762
No, it's just that elves are more attractive in everything they do. I mean, if that were a human chick, it'd be all like: "Ick! All that wailing and gasping is very unbecoming! My entire day has been ruined by her unseemly demise!" With the elf it's more like: "It's too bad my companion is dead, but at least I never had to see any signs she was suffering. Sure I've had better days, but once I have a few drinks with my (still living) friends, everything will be just fine."

>> No.16188834

>>16188755
Huh. I never noticed that. The way her shadow falls across the sword makes it look like she's embedded the thing in her leg.

>> No.16188854

>>16188778
>It also should be reported.
The Department of Edged Weapons has a regulation setting the minimum legal distance between sword and leg?

>> No.16188868

>>16188854
No because its a child model.

>> No.16188876

>> No.16188878

>>16188868
serious? I gotta say, 0/10

>> No.16188883

>>16188868
And you can tell how? Looks about nineteen to me.

>> No.16188886

>>16188878
dude im not joking its cp.

>> No.16188892

>>16188886
There is nothing pornographic in that picture, you shit faggot.

>> No.16188895

>>16188721
Oh god, somebody tell me there's a version of this with a deflated fake tit.

>> No.16188898

>>16188868
Is it really? She has really big boobs for a kid. It never occurred to me that she might not be an adult. Still, to be on the safe side I'll delete it. My apologies if I've erred.

>> No.16188907

>>16188755
Why is that girl carrying my amplifier while wearing stupid shoes? How can I electrobard if she drops it and it breaks?

>> No.16188909

>>16188898
He's a lying faggot, and you're a fag for listening.

>> No.16188920

>>16188892
Seriously. It might be racy, but it's not pornography.

>> No.16188935

>>16188892
>There is nothing pornographic in that picture, you shit faggot.
It was sexualized though. I wouldn't have grabbed / posted a picture like that if I thought the model was under age.

>> No.16188945

>>16188935
Did I mention you're a fag?
I'm right, because I say so.
You should therefore believe me.

>> No.16188951

>>16188935
Don't worry anon its some sick fucks idea of a lol trap on 4chan. Same as when someone says whats a good anime and they reply with that gay loli anime.
The girl is at least a 13 year old called Cinderella, googling this will take you to pedo bear country.

>> No.16188956

>>16188886
>cp
I do not think this means what you think it means. Even if she was 16, what she's wearing is about the same as a swimsuit.

>> No.16188957

>>16188951
Prove it.

>> No.16188964

>>16188935
Damn it, you deleted it. I was going to tineye it to see where it came from.

I sincerely doubt that model was underage. Her body, especially her abdomen, was way too developed. You shoot a woman from a strange facial angle with lighting like that and of course her features are going to look shorter and more childlike.

>> No.16188969

>> No.16188971

>>16188957

>> No.16188974

>>16188909
>He's a lying faggot
Could be.

>and you're a fag for listening.
It's no great loss.

>> No.16188975

>>16188951
For fuck's sake, go back to /b/.

>> No.16188978

>>16188971
You heard me.
The burden of proof is on the accuser.

>> No.16188985

>>16188969
Hmm. Every other woman in this image is a giantess . . .

>> No.16188986

>>16188978
should report this whole thread. Gdamn pedos asking for cp.

>> No.16188995

>>16188986

>> No.16189006

>>16188935
Anon, post it again for TinEye and great justice.

>> No.16189007

>>16188995
If im a troll you'd have no problem googling it.

>> No.16189012

>>16189007
You're right, googling "Cinderella" will bring many results related to a fucking MODEL.

>> No.16189015

>> No.16189020

>>16189012
your google-fu is weak, Just as well.

>> No.16189025

>>16189020
You are the accuser.
The burden of proof is on you.
Otherwise, I'm assuming troll.

>> No.16189029

>> No.16189033

>>16180094
No woman would rush naked into battle. And I don't mean out of shame or something like that but bouncing tits are uncomfortable at best and genuinely hurt at worst.

>> No.16189036

>>16189029
Oh God.

. . . I saw her panties as being a fucking overnight maxi pad.

>> No.16189042

>>16189025
reported for asking for cp

>> No.16189053

>>16189042
nice, the /tg/ mod could use a laugh
also
>>16179080
HNNNGGG!

>> No.16189065

what got deleted?

>> No.16189066

>>16189042
>non-nude, non-sexualized image
>cp
get the fuck out...
not all pictures of children is cp.
not even all Nude pictures of children is cp.

>> No.16189070

>>16189033

I could see a woman with only a wrap of some kind running into battle.

Also, if she had A cups.

Really though, why would a woman WANT to run into battle naked unless it was necessary. Tits are sensitive and a big target.

Even psychologically, a horde of nude women doesn't seem like it would have the same effect as a horde of nude men.

>> No.16189087

>>16185004
Or not.

>> No.16189091

>>16189065
Girl with big tits and a big sword in a skimpy bikini. There was no nudity, but the picture was obviously sexualized. She didn't look under age to me, but I'll defer to others as it can sometimes be a bit hard to tell, especially from a single picture.

>> No.16189105

>>16189091
I really don't think she was underage. Her breasts were of the shape that made it questionable as to whether or not they were implants.

There was nothing pornographic about the picture.

>> No.16189109

>>16189091
smart anon
>>16189105
dumb anon

>> No.16189115

>>16189091
You mean the painfully obvious troll?
>>16189109
Case in point.

Does it hurt to be that beta?

>> No.16189120

I just failed my curiosity save

now I must quest to find that deleted picture. Is there a name I can google search?

>> No.16189132

>>16189120
I'll post it.

>> No.16189135 [DELETED] 

My gift to anon.

>> No.16189142

>>16189132
Heh, oops. Ninja'ed this guy.

>> No.16189147

>>16189135

How could anyone think that is underage? The face is a bit kiddy, but look at that chest. Christ.

>> No.16189153

>>16189135
Beat me to it.
No way I'll believe that it's a child model. Too fucking curvy.

>> No.16189161

>>16189135
Hmm. Is that a photo Julie Belle and Chris Valeho (sp) used as a model for their fantasy art?

>> No.16189163

>>16189135

http://www.google.com.au/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuF4ExTB-xpPUmZ00G5KJRmAaGCGTAmyXK8ODzpBfExcvjtXMk1J33f
JDNJMwW8bDVQuNey-_1_1EDyy_1dA5Bw61rws24rT8AFeE6ieErU2TMJgHi3P6eeu4zJavZOYwkQO9W2T8jqd7D0roWASTdV9lZv
Ouw97lni1CxA_17AfRrz8ejuf1VyTmK0sWX1X6ks4DCYxyamXRx4sSByvVwYw8tgrDWQwsWgRnJo-yQx3g3gs1ap5lJUVovwWFLx
1Kt7m5l7vBjuNbfdjHjcJyFwxwzRnCDQpm_10W7y6I7HdmKdMaMStjP8Y2yCrRz9nJuu-SpUMB5rHxmqmypqi9JXDMTgtAMOfDXx
ARQQR4y-p5gL3pbT1X7bHqo19zlSLnzd8LJekKv7eGfVAG_15tIfI_1ewtFcojapnnOJMGuH6FAM6vK3Foc3OVTjwegmRUIC2jxI
WQk2i39HG3TtaVO8T_17XTaVL7_1_1g22D8iY5eqK8fE8BydjJvlD8b7zq-AGbHzIk3haxGMwZSQFldG6DSTTrP-cjcHt_1tOIuj
H9vasTdF1GAHH9wvANiAVDzeOiMUrpBo9JH2owTZF38G_1N4S4Hz6Yz756e4RMP4NHNlYugtsAmgVb7VzGuZ7S1ftO6XEdiSP9IZ
taLck7eVzTdSsE48sT5CZDTX1vf9FiqAGTHquCx7sBlSgg63tnIyxV9DLwJVZg-O0Q88KYpgERtHLskH_1aOX95gvcP7AXOWTqG2
2dzBafKv9vzAZAGpkcc-DkXyR4Y0gNNRIbHia39mSZoMEUPdcFqb64_1yLCkqmCD7UgzMxvJp5wwSh4OG12QlRQbOr2mr83FvhFJ
faxQczfVapqx8TsjqBcaG1QT-LiYjYV76JQUZvqj5Ueu8xxuWMbaEK2etnkRnWcoMWC382zfKmfb8iT8-f_1eCvy2cBnFr6tgy80
4l6jDOxhd14CcCJ_1wTw6DXgE5APYvDyH7yBs6LD-HYzdaMEg5RMleiHLAIkoEaVENxzk8OTYjpwbNGZ1HlMTziQljskltE4sovu
CV4N555MY1RBEsbUuK18zqfdD5uiCslavXV8eFocCgFfpBtivpjT3cVIPrUzBxflnmbth8cWJI66C835l0ubY6Rq0kkqtJiuJt5e
1lHnalPxzDnYF5RlAZ9Qncyp5erERS_1m9XWFAIETT3pGtL6ad6Mib0BVDdDSnUZuaxOH0YtlmIYYqoDawu4-wy1uo-Qww4oT7mV
JM1KjU8BSjtz6lmVt6wwsUT79dSUvnVJplun351EVAi85Vu0Dno_1Z6JPYtQwYiQi-ywzGp0igH-v4a5BZ5wVnu08gFnHugVqMCZ
XTLDegE0CfUoUv78qce_1dcbOlsPgvSoUd5HA&num=10&hl=en&safe=off&bih=689&biw=1280

For reference.

>> No.16189164

>>16189135
no fucking way thats a child. whoever believed it was a child must be fucking apeshit retarded.

>> No.16189165

>>16189135


she looks sort of like TOPANGA from boy's meat world

>> No.16189167

This is why /tg/ has the worst pedos. They actually try to rationalise their disease.

>> No.16189171

>>16189135

I'd hit it.

>> No.16189173

>>16189087
that... looks really hot
link to full set?

>> No.16189177

>>16189167
So, I think it's pretty safe to say that this motherfucker is a goddamn troll.

>> No.16189182

>>16189135
There's nothing on TinEye.

>> No.16189185

>>16189135
Man, there are seriously people believing she is underage? I mean, the shape of the pelvis is completely incompatible with sexual immatureness.

>> No.16189186

>>16189182

See

>>16189163

>> No.16189187

>>16189177
a shitty one too, maybe hes tired

>> No.16189191

>>16189167
>This is why /tg/ has the worst trolls. They actually try to rationalise their retardation.

>> No.16189199

>>16189173
Nope. Just a random thing I grabbed on /fit/

>> No.16189201

Totally impractical battle garb.

What the fuck is up with captcha? I usually go days without fucking one up, but today I get every other one wrong. And they all looked pretty obvious to me.

>> No.16189204

I wish the mod would hurry up and ban the samefagging pedo ITT. Seriously you are shitting up /tg/

>> No.16189206

>>16189163

Doesn't work lol.

>>16189182

Reverse google image search. Drag and drop the picture into google image search box.

>> No.16189208

>>16189135
Olsen twin?

>> No.16189215

>>16189199
damn...

>>16189204
diaf, plz
>http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/50502/
>Of course those are impnats, which is totally fine, btw. She's gorgeous. She's not 14 in those pics. She was 14 in the purple one-piece pics. Her chest is much much bigger in this pic, but she's 18 now.

>> No.16189222

>>16189173

Tineye only gives me this:
http://extragoodshit.phlap.net/?p=108204

>> No.16189228

>>16189215
OMFG you idiots shes a 13 yearold child model have you thought that isnt a fucking claymore shes carrying thats a long sword. FFS

>> No.16189232

>>16189215
Well, problem solved. Now to deal with that fucking troll.

>> No.16189235

>>16189185
>I mean, the shape of the pelvis is completely incompatible with sexual immatureness.
That's what I thought, though if you look closely at her face, she does look kind of young. And girls develop earlier these days, so you never know.

>> No.16189248

Longsowrd
Length avg. 105–120 cm (41–47 in)

>> No.16189250

>>16189222
Uncensored at least, ty

>>16189228
It's obviously a parade sword...

>> No.16189253

>>16189235
Yeah, well, people thought I was a girl until I was 20 yo.

>> No.16189254

>>16189248
Don't try to reason with the troll.

>> No.16189262

I just want this motherfucker to give proof of what he's saying if he's not a fucking troll. Which he won't do, of course, because he's a fucking troll.

>> No.16189269

>>16189262
requesting CP is a rule violation you stupid fuck. Seriously need a mod in here.

>> No.16189271

>>16189262
He can't. It's already been established that she's 18 in that picture.

>> No.16189273

>>16189235And girls develop earlier these days, so you never know.

They do, yeah.

But then that got me thinking, people got married earlier in the old days too.

Married at age 15 in the renaissance or something?
She has the body of a 12 year old in modern terms

>> No.16189283

>>16189271
She isn't 18. 'Cinderalla model' has an actual pay site. It tells you her age.

>> No.16189284

ohgodmakeitstop.bmp
the artifacts! they are multiplying!

>> No.16189285

>>16189269
how do you know it's cp though?

>> No.16189293

>>16189283
THEN TELL US HER AGE. FOR FUCK'S SAKE.

>> No.16189302

>>16189273
You were obviously never a 12 year old girl.

>> No.16189303

>>16189254
Don't sage if you don't want us to think you're also a troll.

>> No.16189304

...so, even if this chick is like 16 or 17, are we to arrest everyone involved with Victoria's Secret for frequently featuring models as young as 15? OHHH I know, how about we arrest everyone who has seen American Beauty? 17 year old boobies that are *nude* in that...

Also, as for the fun little google "reference" it said no matches found and gave an "our best guess" which means absolutely nothing.

CP is disgusting as fuck and all kinds of twisted, but this shit isn't CP. If you're trolling: 10/10. If you're serious, you're fucking bent. You need some help. Seriously.

Especially since you keep bringing up pedophilia -- do you even know what that word means? A chick who looks like this is unattractive to a pedophile because she's sexually matured (fully formed secondary and primary, well can only assume primary, sexual features). Biologically, she's fully sexed. That means pedos no likey.

>> No.16189306

>>16189285
I thought it was legal too. Then I found the site. Its obviously not a legal site it tries to justify that it is legal but it has no over 18 certification. It even states shes underage but it is 'art'

>> No.16189307

>>16189293
Use reverse google image search. It points to "cinderella girl model" and "Cinderella-Girl.com"

Which has a legal notice that says "Since Cinderella-Girl.com is a minor we are adding this section to our Website.

All Pictures of this model are Non Nude, and all abiding by US and International Laws.

All photos on this site abide by US and International Laws and contain No Nudity.

United States Code Title 18

Parental release and authorization for this site has been obtained and is held on file.

All photo shoots have been taken in the presence of parental supervision or appointed guardian."

http://www.cinderella-girl.info/legal.html

>> No.16189308

>>16189235

Fuck yes, Krod Mandoon!

>> No.16189310

>>16189269
cp requires sexual context.
that is posing and not in any way sexual except for your virgin purist eyes

>> No.16189322

>>16189222
GIS gives me this http://lesbianwomen.tumblr.com/post/4866278224/topless-girls-playing-soccer

Which is a larger version, but no set.

>> No.16189334

>>16189307
Now mods ban the guy assusing people of trolling and for requesting CP.

>> No.16189337

>>16189307
You might have noticed the no nudity, parental consent and national/international law parts of that disclaimer, right? That means this isn't porn, much less child porn.

>> No.16189340

>> No.16189343

>>16189337
dont try and rationalise your sickness.

>> No.16189355

>>16189337
That's my first post in this thread, just trying to provide a source for the claims of her being a minor so people on both sides of the fence will stop herping their derp.

Though I dislike the overt sexualization and marketing of minors to adults I don't care about the CP debate in this thread one way or another.

That being said I'm getting out of here before a mod nukes the site from orbit.

>> No.16189357

>>16189343
Uuuuuh-huuuuuuh. Of course, Mr. Moral Guardian, I'll get right on doing everything you tell me.

>> No.16189363

>> No.16189365

>>16189343
Hush, dearie. Grown-ups are talking here, why don't you run along and play with your fellow tards?

>> No.16189366

>>16189343
>I live in denial

>> No.16189372

>>16189355
Thanks for the sane, rational contribution. Unlike some other people, you actually helped out.

>> No.16189376

This thread has moved from irritating to hi-larious.

>> No.16189379

>> No.16189381

>>16189376
It is pretty amazing what one stubborn troll can do, isn't it?

>> No.16189382

>>16189343
Go back to bed Timmy. It's still way too early for you to get up.

>> No.16189404

>> No.16189422

>>16189382
>>16189381
>>16189366
>>16189365
>>16189357
same fagging Pedo retard. I refer you to >>>/s/ rule on this type of thing. Which applies to all boards.

>> No.16189430

>>16189422
nope.jpg

>> No.16189437

>>16189422
>Serial posts
>>16189382
>>16189381
>>16189357
>All within the same minute
>>16189365
>>16189366
That is one quick samefag...
now go away

>> No.16189462

>>16189437
Meh, I deleted it anyway, though. It got to the point where it was more trouble than it was worth and if anyone who wanted it hasn't saved it by now, then they're SOL.

>> No.16189464

>> No.16189476

>> No.16189480

>>16184231

Wait a second... Is that a Bullet Witch screen cap?! Someone else in the world acknowledges, nay, -liked- Bullet Witch?! ... Come brother. Ride with me into the sunset. From this day forward, we shall be 'bros'.

>> No.16189489

>>16189480
3rd guy reporting in who liked Bullet Witch.

Although I after two playthroughs I was done and couldn't play it anymore.

>> No.16189498

welp... I'm scraping the bottom of the barrel here
have an Annah, because dat tiefling

>> No.16189500

>>16189480
>>16189489
It was an awful Bayonetta ripoff.
I don't even like Bayonetta.

>> No.16189510

>>16189498
image cap... damn

>> No.16189515

>>16189500
It came out way before Bayonetta to be a rip off.

>> No.16189530

>>16189515
Seemed similarly repetitive and mediocre to me.

>> No.16189534

>>16184231

Pre-release shovelware then. Still, it has its charms, and I find myself going back to it every now and then, if nothing but for the Geists.

>> No.16189537

>>16189310
>>16189120

you can tell when an artist fapped while drawing

>> No.16190203

Buns of steel!

>> No.16190888

>>16189273
>Married at age 15 in the renaissance or something?
13 has always been the marriageable age and it still is in Vatican for example, and it's the consensus age in Spain.
That's because the Virgin Mary married at that age, and because we can't afford to muck about when we have convenience marriages to celebrate.

Sexual development works according to diet and health, so people develop faster when they are healthy and slower when there is shit going, it's not a regular progression, thou today we reached maximum speed in sexual maturity, because of how fucking healthy we are, there are girls that reach puberty around 9.

>> No.16192231

>>16190888
The Vatican doesn't have any kids to get married (it's only a country legally; in reality it's just a single complex), and whatever laws it technically has on the matter are just that way because they're the same as Italy.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action