[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games

View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 661 KB, 1424x4000, Barbarian1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
14458285 No.14458285 [Reply] [Original] [4plebs] [archived.moe]

-4 strength thread

>> No.14458290
File: 98 KB, 1000x1000, Daemonette 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458293

What would you call this?

>> No.14458296
File: 68 KB, 858x900, Troll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458304

Forbidden Lore (Archeotrolling)

>> No.14458306
File: 70 KB, 600x800, Supermodel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458314
File: 86 KB, 770x1300, Sheeva.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458324
File: 168 KB, 1200x2200, Haribel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458326

By the way, normally I hate namefags on general principle, but I gotta give some props in your case.
For the name itself. I reserve judgement about you otherwise.

>> No.14458329
File: 46 KB, 509x800, Ink Eyes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458334
File: 31 KB, 576x720, Malal Girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458338
File: 81 KB, 620x621, Maidmer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458344
File: 89 KB, 487x1488, Muscle Elf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458346

what exactly is the significance of this -4 strength thing

it was in a thread on /v/ about trolling /tg/ once.

>> No.14458348
File: 33 KB, 308x500, Pirotess.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458358
File: 62 KB, 531x708, Predator 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Dungeons and Dragons rule, if you were playing a female she had -4 strength in older editions.

It is a /tg/ meme I believe since /tg/ was created.

>> No.14458361
File: 29 KB, 460x640, Robo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458365
File: 241 KB, 1171x1600, Robo Model.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458369

Holy shit. That's pretty insane. And sexist.

>> No.14458370
File: 63 KB, 536x800, Sea Urchin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458375

in general, females have less muscle mass. it's a game though, so who gives a shit.

>> No.14458377


was it even in DnD?

I thought it was just a scientific troll based on mass difference between male and female weightlifters in sports tournaments, translated into DnD terms

>> No.14458381


Old D&D statted most races with modifiers on the attributes rolled during character creation. Making the character female netted it a -4 on Strength. It's sorta like Armour making you harder to hit - a fairly bad shorthand rule. People usually combine that with biologicstic arguments to make themselves feel better about their own failures at life.

>> No.14458384
File: 82 KB, 725x800, Succubus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

4chan has a way of making fun of fascism.

Thus, because of all the buff shirtless male heroes that were jaw-droppers for women and the less women wore as armor the better their armor was, -4strength thread and a female version existed for a while what was it again... +4 str thread? I forget.

>> No.14458389
File: 485 KB, 638x854, Genica_and_Zeta_at_Maidens_08_by_Jebriodo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458390

>Reduced strength due to reduced body size and weight
>Chainmail bikinis

>> No.14458395

No, it's realistic. Although to be fair, they should be given +4 charisma, also realistic

>> No.14458398

we really shouldn't start this again, though it can sometimes be funny.

>> No.14458401
File: 72 KB, 1024x768, Wizzie.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Anyone seend deathleaper lately? I miss her dumping her gigabytes of relevant images.

>> No.14458402

Doesn't kinda betray tradition, since they are buff as fuck?

>> No.14458403

>in general, females have less muscle mass.

There's noting wrong with having such a rule, but it's fairly bad as strenght accounts for more than just upper-body muscle strenght ingame.

>> No.14458408
File: 51 KB, 1000x750, Automom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

2:30am typo

>> No.14458410

I didn't say chainmail bikinis are yay. They piss me off. Don't put words in my mouth.

It's sexist because, as an action, it favors one character sex over another. Picking a sex or gender in game shouldn't have a stat effect. There's no noticeable difference between either, especially not one that can't be made up with more training in some area.

>> No.14458412
File: 27 KB, 244x417, llLeona.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458413
File: 67 KB, 600x893, Baroness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I got so many images from deathleapers thread autosaging image dumps. I could use you here DLFG if you're up tonight.

>> No.14458416
File: 233 KB, 609x422, ChunliMirror.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Strongest woman in the world.

>> No.14458417

You stop that this instant, anon.

>> No.14458418

Howabout you let players decide what STR their character has, eh buddy?

This isn't like allotting 4 less STR, it's a straight up penalty and that's grievous.

>> No.14458423
File: 102 KB, 800x1035, Banshee1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

To be honest I think the rule was in the 1990's DnD, even though I don't play DnD. They changed the rule.

>> No.14458425
File: 471 KB, 1200x1400, SKNIGHT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

-4 dexterity

>> No.14458432
File: 52 KB, 620x542, Mussy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

To be honest I've seen men with frames weaker than this woman.

>> No.14458433

What about having a natural birth? How do you train a guy to do that? Women, -4 Str, +8 Con

>> No.14458435
File: 1.81 MB, 1086x1517, female armor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Needs a helmet and a shield.
Other than that, I approve.

>> No.14458437
File: 61 KB, 1212x860, Callidus 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458439


>> No.14458440

Brilliant! I'm assuming that's why women stay with men who beat them? It doesn't take away as many hit points, relatively?

>> No.14458441

in general, bro. in general.

>> No.14458443

its also an excuse to post muscular women. i love this meme

>> No.14458445

Was this rule ever in any published D&D edition?

I thought it was a house rule created by DMs who don't want their THAT GUY being creepier then usual.

>> No.14458446
File: 460 KB, 2048x3086, Warrior Maiden.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I may have a few you might approve of.

God damn it, DLFG had an entire two threads worth of females in acceptable armor, I never thought I would have to save them with her dumping those all the time.

>> No.14458448
File: 26 KB, 250x320, 20-bookoferoticfantasy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.14458449
File: 87 KB, 398x600, cirno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

That doesn't look like Cirno

+9 strength thread

>> No.14458458

that's a bit better. chicks are not beautiful in chainmail bikinis, mostly because all of their innards would be on the ground in an instant.

>> No.14458459
File: 70 KB, 704x644, FGK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

This maybe?

No seriously I didn't save anything from her folder of decently armored women. That girl was manic saving all those images....

>> No.14458468

>Realistic treatment of wounds

>> No.14458469
File: 142 KB, 1280x1004, Banshees1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ah I got this one. 40k, though again... I may have to go to the other tg related chan site to see if DLFG has dumped there.

>> No.14458471
File: 788 KB, 1086x1636, cirno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.14458474
File: 180 KB, 1274x1754, leona_12_hires.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458475

is there something about this...anime...thing and the number 9 that I'm just not getting?

>> No.14458478
File: 234 KB, 1600x1200, Dire Angel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

All of the ones I got that are semi acceptable have no helmet.

>> No.14458481
File: 233 KB, 654x902, toughelf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

lol, sexist... if I say women have generally bigger breasts than men, am I sexist too?

>> No.14458484
File: 102 KB, 1200x1500, GM Nurglette swimsuit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Careful you, swimwear-like exposure might get you banned.

>> No.14458486

>has never seen a fat man before.

>> No.14458487
File: 24 KB, 538x660, Spikey bits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Oops wrong image, I meant to post this one.

>> No.14458489

Shitty /jp/ touhou faggotry, so bad they got banned from /a/ and /v/.

Pay it no mind.

>> No.14458492
File: 210 KB, 432x779, 1260714524332.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458497
File: 90 KB, 1024x667, 1283541126295.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458498
File: 72 KB, 800x585, Burning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I love cinderlings from MTG, especially official art like this one.

>> No.14458502
File: 1.28 MB, 1800x2958, 1288290094744.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Oops clicked the wrong one...

>> No.14458503
File: 103 KB, 611x840, Daemon Huntress.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458504
File: 166 KB, 660x800, 1299734974940.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

+4 CHA

>> No.14458510
File: 406 KB, 1280x1024, 1288695386711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458511
File: 69 KB, 620x877, Cat Fight.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458515
File: 249 KB, 714x941, 1288696068782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458516
File: 30 KB, 176x137, jesuschristhowhorrifying_cirno.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>respond to guy inquiring about 9
>get 9
>my face when, but replace "horrifying" with "appropriate"

>> No.14458517
File: 63 KB, 596x880, Barbarian2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458525

At least you didn't say something brainless like "ironic"

>> No.14458526
File: 51 KB, 549x762, Burn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Gotta love cinderlings.

>> No.14458532
File: 442 KB, 825x900, 1295903615053.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

What do you mean -4 strength?

>> No.14458535
File: 125 KB, 679x1000, Commander.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>Missiles or Lasers

>> No.14458537

That is a fucking awesome Elf drawing

>> No.14458540
File: 87 KB, 900x695, Blood Pact.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458541
File: 29 KB, 360x720, 1290528305879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Any requests for female PC's?

>> No.14458549
File: 150 KB, 1280x1024, Khorne Lady2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458555
File: 70 KB, 940x589, Elves.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

You might like this one.

>> No.14458558

strong, tall, long blond hair.

if POSSIBLE carrying a curved sword like a kilij, falchion or shamshir.

>> No.14458565
File: 63 KB, 600x909, Miss Marvel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I'm sure a PC drawfag like one of the... No wait, most of them were banned from the "get in here" thread mass ban, even if they can come back they chose not to. At least that is what I hear, you'll have to go to the other place they draw at to get it.

>> No.14458570
File: 283 KB, 716x716, 1287323995246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.14458575
File: 771 KB, 694x1288, Alpha Sister.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>inb4 hitler drawfag

>> No.14458580
File: 91 KB, 741x1024, Diva.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458582
File: 106 KB, 375x550, 1289816208073.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458584


Banning drawfags? Why?

>> No.14458586
File: 786 KB, 675x570, alicebrunhildprofile.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

also pretty nice. I was thinking something like this

I know it's a GW2 image but I just can't draw for shit D:

>> No.14458589
File: 162 KB, 1005x1407, Mad Necro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458595
File: 52 KB, 454x816, Loli Saw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Because people griped at their roleplay on a traditional games board. "Avatarfagging" it was deemed even though they didn't give it that name themselves. Many people roleplay still and don't get banned. It was just people griping enough that others were playing a /tg/ in /tg/. It went on for almost a month IIRC, and then anyone who participated in the tread, posting or otherwise was banned for a month.

>> No.14458597
File: 151 KB, 1233x841, This is how you wood elf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Nice. Good old Lodoss War.

In return, some excellent advice on how to roleplay a wood elf, or how to DM human/elf relationships.

>> No.14458608
File: 179 KB, 700x875, 1260712900055.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Would /tg/ like me to dump my dark dames folder?

>> No.14458610

When did this happen?

>> No.14458617
File: 38 KB, 680x1000, Mistress.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Typos. Anyway, that put a sour taste behind their lips and they rarely come back here. I saw a few and tried to get them to hang out in one of our local livestream hang outs.

I rather not spoil their fun by revealing the chan site and/or the livestream they go to. I rather the venom not follow them, at their request.

There was once a day that there were an average of 3 drawthreads and over twenty requests granted every 24 hours.

>> No.14458623
File: 118 KB, 1024x768, Farseer 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

I forget, it was a while ago. (A year maybe?) They sure stuck to their threat of not returning. This is what happens when mods listen to a few gripers that gripe endlessly until they got what they wanted.

>> No.14458625

That uncannily resembles Alucard from Hellsing while he was imprisoned.

>> No.14458626
File: 56 KB, 550x629, Gnome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458638
File: 287 KB, 1011x1438, Pirotess4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Ah yeah. Hands bound behind his back right?

>> No.14458640
File: 110 KB, 1024x1024, Alpha Cultist.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458643
File: 72 KB, 771x1200, Autarch.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458651
File: 50 KB, 744x700, Harlequin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Getting food, I'll be back to continue dumping.

>> No.14458655
File: 120 KB, 984x1400, 1265462123098.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Even without the -4 Str, she will still kick your arse.

>> No.14458658
File: 596 KB, 1000x673, 1283475819223.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

There's a steady one drawthread a day being archived on suptg for the last two weeks at least. Two from yesterday. Either they're coming back or they just slowed down a little, assuming that there aren't more that aren't being archived.

Could be just your specific group that left, but the drawfag population is undiminished.

>> No.14458667


I don't think anyone was arguing against 20dex weapon finesse builds.

>> No.14458685

Prehaps after she shot me to death.

>> No.14458705

>-4 STR thread
>all SFW images
>last time I made this thread I got 7 day ban for "Fetish crap"
>OP has gotten off scott free

Yes, I'm fucking bitter

>> No.14458707
File: 76 KB, 568x1002, Necro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

No, those are new drawfags.

I see our old ones on steam, livestream and various other locations. A sum of no less than 12 drawfags who do not want to return to /tg/. They do requests still in /v/ and sometimes /b/ though.

(Most of them came from /v/ in the first place)

>> No.14458723 [DELETED] 
File: 57 KB, 694x1000, Pariah 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

No, those are new drawfags.

I see our old ones on steam, livestream and various other locations. A sum of no less than 12 drawfags who do not want to return to /tg/. They do requests still in /v/ and sometimes /b/ though.

Most of them came from /v/ in the first place.

>> No.14458729
File: 30 KB, 632x597, Protess.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Son of a... Lag.... Stupid wait to delete a post.

>> No.14458732


Isn't that the fuckable whore from Queen Hunt?

>> No.14458734
File: 57 KB, 694x1000, Pariah 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458742

Risty or Listy depending on your eye slant.

Bandit queen of the desert and ruiner off anuses with an oversized morning star.

>> No.14458743
File: 91 KB, 1000x937, Zombie Girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458745


"Our old ones" = some people who drew on /tg/ for a bit.

We've had dozens of drawfags over the years, it's not like your group was some magical special group. As you said, they came here from /v/ to begin with.

>> No.14458760
File: 51 KB, 612x792, Daemonette 6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Seems like loads of contributors have been shooed away from /tg/ these path months.

And come to think of it we passed the 1 year mark for those drawfags last summer. So close to 2 years.

Including the guy who did this? (more posting)

>> No.14458764
File: 40 KB, 800x991, Callidus 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

And this artist.

>> No.14458767
File: 42 KB, 637x757, Creepy Doll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

And this artist as well.

>> No.14458772
File: 48 KB, 600x600, Sister of Slaanesh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Also this one. Who also did the daemonette generator.

>> No.14458776

more daemonettes!

>> No.14458777
File: 31 KB, 487x490, x-tan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

And this artist,

>> No.14458780
File: 34 KB, 588x939, Cultist SoB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

And this artist... The list goes on and on.

>> No.14458782

You can thank the Janitor for any drawfags leaving.

Just saying.

>> No.14458790
File: 139 KB, 405x600, -4str.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>> No.14458795

I think /tg/ has only itself to blame.

>> No.14458798


Most of these are really shitty.

And nothing of value was lost dot jpg

>> No.14458799

Oh and here is a big kicker, "Love can bloom" artist was also banned in that thread even though he wasn't avatarfagging. I have seen him do only a few requests here since then. People religiously pick apart his deviantart account to bring his art here. It may look familiar to you.

Yes, we lost this artist in that bash.

Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.