Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
[ERROR] No.11602763 [Reply] [Original] [4plebs] [archived.moe]

Sup /tg/?
Quick question, as I cannot decide on my own I thought I would come get the opinion of a dozen or so like-minded complete strangers. I'm making some new minis to represent my officers in my IG list. One of them, who was my original SO but became a JO as the list grew, I sketched a pic of wearing aviaitor sunglasses. This got the idea stuck in my head, and now I cannot decied whether or not to model them onto his new mini. Sure they would look badass from both a litteral and "cool mod bro" standpoint, but it would also seem very caviler. Sure 40k shouldn't be taken too seriously, but I fear it would simply look too silly for an IG list; the minis of which are mostly stock and the ones that aren't have no silliness to them.

>> No.11602781

DO IT, FAGGOT.

Seriously, it's a cool conversion, and it will look badass. Do it.

>> No.11602782

He also has nothing to do with the air-support

>> No.11602797

Do it. It's not exactly out of place.

Pic related (model at the top)

>> No.11602814

Go for it, man. Put that cavalier feeling into your whole army. Cigars, shades, shit like that. It would be awesome.

>> No.11603030

Very well then.
>>11602814
I also like this idea, should be cool. If I do it to all the officers as well as the sargents it will fit right in.

However their new poses need to be dynamic, lets have thread of badasses. Strictly /tg/ or otherwise. Pictures of people in bad-ass poses.

Double points if it's 40k IG.

>> No.11603109

This could honestly be a great collection of reference material for everyone on the board.
Female badasses welcome too.

>> No.11603167

>> No.11603238

>> No.11603279

>> No.11603293

Come on, someone else contribute.

>> No.11603304

>>11603279
Woops, sorry.

Also, I have to have one of them doing the walk in this image.

>> No.11603353

>> No.11603777

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
Captcha
Action