Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games

Search:


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.38287487 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
38287487

>>38287449
What?

>> No.38186025 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
38186025

>>38185430
Whaaaaat.

>> No.37260320 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
37260320

>>37260307
>calling out paedophiles is autism

Really now?

>> No.37131481 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
37131481

This has to be fake.

I mean, even accounting and compensating for the fact that people are idiots and wrong about everything

this can't be real. A person did not sit down and write this with a straight face.

>> No.37042927 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
37042927

>>37042795
>>37042753
What a bizarre version of reality some people live in.

Women are biologically physiologically weaker than men, on average, at minimum and in terms of potential maximums. This isn't conveniently created pseudo-science like the half-baked quasi-eugenics that drifts out of /pol/ and/or the 1920s, this is just basic biology.

Women CAN be made equal to men in terms of physical strength, but that takes a dangerous and unethical series of hormone treatments through childhood and puberty. And they'd end up just being dudes with vaginas.

I've never understood rejection of facts in favour of what 'should' be. I personally believe that women do have military applications, if chicks can pass the physical requirements of a military branch I see little reason to turn them down for it. According to an anon earlier, women made good WWII urban countersnipers and perhaps could serve similar purposes better than male counterparts. Access to some form of relatively safe steroid treatments could also allow females to pass entry requirements for the militaries - bodies are bodies.

Unfortunately reality isn't based on what would be nice or humanity would be in a post-scarcity utopia where work is simply a form of diversion and we all have infinite breadstick machines. As it is we're living lives according to reality and we've got to accept and adapt. I dont think anyone here is saying women 'shouldnt' be serving in the military, just that the reality of it would make it highly impractical in a number of ways.

>> No.37021612 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
37021612

>>37021587
>No legitimate posters are anti-quest.

Are you seriously defining 'legitimacy' by whether or not they support your pet thread type?

I've not even posted ITT, just saw this retarded fucking post from the frontpage.

>> No.36864776 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, CritfailSpeech.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
36864776

>>36864710
...that's a very good point. Hadn't thought of that.

>> No.36816665 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
36816665

>>36816628
That's pretty much exactly what I said.

>> No.36795332 [View]
File: 2.60 MB, 500x281, critfail speech check.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
36795332

>>36792448
>calling your father sexy



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]