[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

If you can see this message, the SSL certificate expiration has been fixed.
Become a Patron!

/tg/ - Traditional Games


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.12295173 [View]
File: 145 KB, 400x294, Baneblade.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


>> No.12041082 [View]
File: 145 KB, 400x294, Baneblade.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


Perhaps, but the tank is based on WW1 designs, and still has the same inherent design / shape flaws. Take the same materials, and rebuild the tank to have the shape of an abrams or other modern tank and it is almost immediately superior because of common tank design knowledge that wasn't available when they made the WW1 tank design.

The Baneblade actually has a much better profile, and far less design issues than the leman russ (though it still has exposed front tracks).

View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]