/sci/ - Science & Math

I work in Google AI image recognition team (will not describe it any further for safety reasons).

SJWs can destroy all AI progress due to unrealistic demands.

We learned that our detection algorithm can't reach any progress when it is retrained each time
black person is identified as gorilla.. legal team pressed us to include (we called it) deGGlass (from gorilla glass) switch for network re-train/re-condition in case of "wrong" identification.

As a workaround we hired black human operators (BHO), and each time GAI detects gorilla - question is redirected
to them, and they have deciding vote... (sometimes they are confused too).

We called it BDG, blacks detection gap, this can block us for many years to come...

AI cant progress any further in our political landscape. Political correctness will stop US....but China is safe to go further....

Nothing can suck, only a vacuum can create suction. Then Hoover makes vacuum cleaners. So sucks is Hoover.

>>2046217
So far I only know of 2 people to speak of Dulce in the scope of having actually worked there.

Thomas Castello and Phil Schneider.

I know nothing of the whereabouts of Thomas Castello, and the only information I have of his location is that he travels abroad but mostly resides in Costa Rica.

Phil Schneider on the other hand died in his apartment of unknown complications, or under mysterious circumstances.

>>2046075
/x/ would rather play make-believe and stream movies while arguing amongst themselves. I would rather talk with knowledgeable people, even if they aren't well versed in the area I speak of.

I want to know any and all information about Dulce I can find or hear about. So anything anyone here knows will be good enough for me.

>>2046048
Too bad /x/ is shit.

What does /sci/ know about Dulce and the supposed underground base there?

Picture unrelated

Define "is"

>>1537646

bump

So, I was looking at some stuff guys...and I thought /sci/ might find this interesting.

http://johnbedini.net/john34/bedinicolemotor.mpg

>>1473923
I was going to say the same thing, but with more WORD WORD WORD.

\theory as follows\
The universe is still quite young.
We are the first ones to evolve intelligence.
We are the precursors.
/theory ends/

>>1446404
No, I meant na.
As in, Sodium. Sodium + H20 = boom

>>1446333
Imposing my faith on another person would be against my morals, as such, I could not do so in a manner that you describe. It would be morally wrong for me to do - but to offer advice and comfort and, if needed be done, religious help, I can do. It's all about consent.

Second:

God.

That's a tough one. If my wording seems wrong, attribute it to someone with a limited understanding.

God is perfect love. God is the point between wisdom and intelligence, where one should strive for. God is the ultimate creator, a singularity of purpose and will - the creator, whom set in motion the events which created everything, before sitting back to watch, and offer guidance. God is imperfectly understood and, as people grow, the understanding grows with it, to become something more and changing. God cannot be understood completely, but neither can the universe - thus we must seek to understand it as best we can. God is Pi, Prime, Infinite, and Zero. God Is the First Event. God is the eventual colapse/recontinuiation of the universe when it should happen again. God is the measure and ruler, and the taker of these measurements.

In truth, I don't understand what God is. I just know it's something I've always enjoyed, and follow.

>>1446322
Excuse my verbage.

They can be mixed. Trying to use them together can be a problem. I find no problems thus far, and use them to supliment one another, while constantly looking for new information.

Improperly mixing can be disasterous.

See: Na, H20

>>1446331
I find the worse thing anyone can do, is force faith on a child. I was lucky that my mother, while nominally christian, basicly told me: "You are your own person. I will teach if you would like, but if you don't want to listen, I'll love you anyway."

>>1446304
Aye. And he did return. For three days dead, one day arose. Thus, by his own words, in his return, the old laws were struck away.

We can agree to disagree on this.

I am a christ follower.
I am also a lover of science.

My personal beliefs and science are not mutually exclusive. If you wish to get technical, I might even say I am more scientificly oriented, than religiously. By observing and understanding, I better appretiate what the universe is, and my faith in God is rewarded. I attribute conflicts to my own improper understanding of one of the two. In time, I work them out, and they do not interfere any more.

Religion and Science are quite compatable. Just keep them from mixing.

>>1446271
I apologize, I do not follow that testament.

>>1446273
I've found that the best way to preach, is simply to live the tennants of your faith, instead of standing and shouting them. I would refer to a section of the bible that I sometimes look through (rarely).

To paraphrase:

"If a city should refuse to hear the word of God, simply dust off your shoes and continue on."

Or, as I understand it:
"If no one wants to hear about it, don't talk about it."

Pretty simple stuff.

Do I, myself, view myself as Christian?
No.
Do I view myself as a follower of Christ?
Yes.

They are not mutually exclusive. In many ways, I've come to understand my religious beliefs as more moral gudielines to live and strive for, not a dogmatic guide to not venture from. Even more, if one does not learn, one does not have any faith or understanding, and merely pays lip service. This is not faith - in fact, it's quite the opposite.

Glad that we can have a friendly debate.

Do you have AIM/YIM? Further talking in real time would be loved.

>>1446232
Thou shall not Lie.
>Obvious reasons. Liars are douchebags.

Thou shall not commit Adultry.
>I can debate on this. Adultry, as in, cheating, or Adultry, as in: "Consentual between adults?"

Thou shall not Covet.
>Jealousy is a bitch. Don't let it consume you.

Thou shall honor thy mother and father.
>Does not imply birth parents. Does imply those who raise and taught you.
>Even if you disagree.

Thou shall not steal.
>Seriously. I like this rule.

Thou shall not commit murder.
>Do not murder. Different than kill. Big difference. Not for this argument.

Thou shall honor the sabbath.
>Take a day off every once in a while.

Thou shall have no other gods but God.
>I follow this, but my understanding of God has widened considerably in the last few years.

...Okay, that's 8 of 'em.
Lemme look up...

No Graven Images
>Uhm, sure. This is a funny debate, but I assume that it's more: "No statues of gods to worship" more than "NO STATUES"

Thou shall not take thy Lord's name in vain.
>Don't call on God to solve your problems. If you actually work for a solution and ask, sure. If you lay back and don't do shit, fuck you, buddy.

>>1446197
I've met my share of Aetheist Radicals, and aethiests who just live a life as they want to. There's a difference between the two, and I respect one, and enjoy a good debate with them. The other I quietly shuffle into the Fundie category.

But then again, everything has a radical.

>>1446199
We will have to disagree on this point.

Some believe faith is blind. I find blind faith to be foolish. I do not like being a fool, so I look for evidence for my faith and find it.

Please, there is no excuse for disrespect, or insults in a polite discussion.

>>1446180
I live to serve.