/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7300631
Yeah, sounds odd... Well, she's has a PhD in mathematics...

Rectangle doesn't contain a full width of wha...? Wouldn't that be not a rectangle then if it were partially missing? I think it would be just an irregular triangle if we were to connect three points than four points.

Not too sure; I lack common sense.

The video I showcased to /sci/ was Hannah Fry's speech on the mathematics of love; I thought that was cool and all but it seems as though it was off at a tangent. In the real world, below and average males tend to have a harder time to date because 80% of males are not attractive and are non-existent to most women. Let's be serious its be serious here its been bashed and hurled that women have it easier when it comes to securing a relationship.

Prove me wrong, gentlemen ;).

Tips: you can't ;).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFVXsjVdvmY

lifting tears up the CNS/mind (if youre training for completely for strength and especially if you're a stem guy). i prefer getting my work done in the day and lifting at night (close to midnight).

getting tired before doing maths assignments is a bit of a hassle.

>>7296742
Here's an okay'ish question. I did it for fun during last holidays; my uni isn't up to content for it... We'll get to it soon.

You could use two methods; the path integral version or the zeta function version respectively a physics undegrad could use path integrals to prove it and the maths undegrad could use the zeta function. Normally, those that are studying theoretical physics or mathematical physics, and pure maths.

Note: the path integral (physics version is a little more messier, but doable).

>>7294534
Seems like the monte carlo seems to be used, I tried evulating c_3 for fun.
>>7294546
Nice man, seems come around in physics pretty often.

Yeah I've seen one of my friends substituting other variables to eliminate the other variables?
>>7294604
Looks like I might get a chance to do it in Differential Geometry, they do teach GR, and SR under it.

>>7294732
<span class="math">\int f(x) dx[/spoiler]
>>7294742
Nice man. It seems to be quite prevalent in quantum physics, particle physics, and statistics.
>>7294755
But now you know its real :).

>>7294819
Yeah, I've read my Professors Linear Algebras thesis; it definitely had a lot of them and first witnessed through it. That's why I made this thread to know what the applications of it are.

Do they arise in applied mathematics and pure mathematics? I thought differential geometry and functional analysis might deal with a bit of it.

What was the problem about? What subject? What stem field you're in?

Interested to hear :).

>>7293711
Oh god noes...

>>7291308
> Doctor (Any. Dr)

You do understand that anyone could get a doctorate in any degrees, right?

>>7286474
five tripe integrals are needed to solve the flux of plasma membranes surging through a cats intenstinal tracks (with is normally used in mathematical veterinary biology)

Higher dimensional integrals tends to solve multitudes of problems.

<span class="math">\int \int \int \int \int \int[/spoiler]

You'll normaly see six fold integrals in quantum physics and other areas in theoretical physics; depends on how your unis teach it. Minskowski Squares could also be used to solve nth dimensional integrals.

Just kidding :^)

>>7271656
Linear Algebra and Real Analysis.

Any

>>7266843
Was linear algebra course proof based?

My unis is proof based (contemporary; even engineering and physics undegrad do the course).

>>7266622
fellow ausbrah.

what uni are you TA'ing at? Is it a Go8?

>>7266677
EE, MechE, and AeroE undegrads in Australia.

Touch on quadruple integrals ;).

>>7266056
Agreed, +1. Also 24 is not old.

I prefer working with mature-aged students and I also hang out with them more often than people my age. People my age are cunts anyways.

I wish I was born earlier.

what if you showed them; instead of deliberately pushing them?

<span class="math">\iiiint\limits_Barnett_Integrals[/spoiler]

quadruple integrals :^)

>>7263137
Grad schools at Australian Universities are horrid (so no), not enough funding, and specialist topics especially if you want to do postgrad in mathematics or physics. Australia does have an alright'ish physics education compared to maths; Australia National University would be numero uno for physics in Aussieland.

Save up money, do postgrad at the States, or the UK. Even Scandinavia and Germany are great prospects. I know two Finnish physicists and they are very talented in programming and mathematics. Finland and Germany is pretty good; the only problem would be is a bit of the language barrier...

>>7263214
The mindset and thought processes you guys have... It's fine, you guys are doing you're job. Reading this thread makes me understand how TA's feels and is a eye opener for me as an undegrad (e.g. frustrations, lazy students, egos,..., etc).

That's fine. It's up to the professors on how harsh they want you guys to mark.

Not all students work in group, they are some lonely people out there as well...

Woah this thread seriously scares the fuck out of me...

Also to the elitists; why not just sign up for higher universities or teach advance classes?

>>7263026
ausfag here. we use WAM, GPA, or Honor, depends on the unis itself. Most of the time we go off with the honors system. GPA goes upwards to 7 (max; which is weird)

85% = First Class honors = is usually a 3.8 GPA

>>7262677
I thought most of them despise physics?

I always thought out of engineering, physics, and maths; girls would choose maths over engineering and physics. Most of them go into engineering and physics by getting tricked into thinking that they have the intensive math courses and lots of maths and their looking for whilst an actual maths degree has what their looking for.

I'm not surprised 80% of females in the engineering workfield quit their jobs whilst 20% stay back (from what I've known in Australia).

>>7262718
It's true that it had been modeled and projected (with fancy symbols and as of such), but when you think about other appilcations regarding with its constants (via numerical values) such as avagadro's number which is used to calculate each one of every moles and this catapulted to big leaps in chemistry. Then we have speed of light, which also made great advancements in physics, and planks constant, and every other out there.

Do you constants (numerical values) where ever modelled and projected? Or did we found it own our own? What about irrational numbers like pi and eulers number; Where they founded out on their own as well? or existed somewhere in nature?

It's a bit of loaded question, I'm mesmerized of how these people made these great advancements, and there was Erwin Schrodinger that famously guessed his equation.