[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9082780 [View]

>>9082746
Is op a /b/tard?
that would explain alot

>> No.9082775 [View]
File: 19 KB, 480x550, CZFL8711.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9082775

>>9082759
Im sorry but you are actually too stupid to understand me. I have called alot of people brainlets on /sci/ and I have never meant it with such sincerity. I pity you, brainlet.

>> No.9082756 [View]

>>9082742
reasoning is a higher level thought process than whatever it is you are doing.
maybe reading this will help you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosemiotics

>> No.9082732 [View]

>>9082728
>I got no meaning out of your post
im well aware.
>Zebras getting eaten alive aren't interpreting meaning
Then how are they suffering?

>> No.9082721 [View]

>>9082718
DMT has nothing to do with my post apart from me not wanting to kill myself. If you call the philosophy of biology as hippie fantasy i suggest you stop concerning yourself with life

>> No.9082714 [View]

>>9082689
>Do they not realize that life leads to immense suffering? Once sentience evolves, you just have animals capable of feeling pain running around eating each other, and dying of diseases.
"suffering" is a by product of meaning. Life is about living and nothing else. I know suffering and i know life. Once upon a time i wanted neither. Then i experienced death after smoking DMT and knew that the former is worth putting up with for the later. There is no higher purpose than being alive, there is no meaning without life.
>you just have animals capable of feeling pain running around eating each other, and dying of diseases.
Life on earth is a single thing indivisible, and all it does in essence is interpret meaning. That is why we search for other life, that is why we suffer, that is how we live.

>> No.9082612 [View]
File: 50 KB, 450x299, CASF8627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9082612

I learned long ago that my joy in life is eroding faster than I can enjoy it. I am only briefly entertained by novelties and the fleeting instances of childlike wanderlust when the clouds of existential terror break away in the warm light of the sun. Then I can clearly see the love that connects me to the life I have grown so far apart from.

>> No.9082599 [View]

>>9081329
whats next, terrestrial sponges?
hahahaha nigga thats straight retarded

>> No.9082588 [View]
File: 30 KB, 400x300, IIQF0111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9082588

>>9081168
i think the apparent answer is they are connected by information, the (+). I dont know the first thing about physics. Is there anyone who knows about quantum information that can confirm this holds true for quarks?
The thing is information is meaningless without life to interpret its meaning. So it appears to me that the part-whole composition of reality is entirely abstract, not necessarily illusory, but an representation abstracted from concrete reality. Concrete which is in actuality just different aggregations of quarks or whatever a mereological simple may be.
Is this line of reasoning solid?
Are the facts on my side?
i suppose it rests on the premise that uninterpreted information is meaningless.
even if so and the (+) has meaning in itself. Is that not just abstracted from the relationship of 1 to 1?
Perhaps information is a mereological simple and the concrete and the abstract supervene at the quantum level? I think a solid argument could be made in this case. What would that mean for the part-whole composition of reality?
That both abstracta and concreta are made up of nothing but mereological simples and the part-whole composition of reality is infact illusory?
i wish i could into formalisms.

>> No.9081376 [View]

>>9081336
nice i did mine to avoid fleshing a coon skin
it belongs to the flies now

>> No.9081355 [View]

>>9081228
e 17
a 3
c 1
n 47
o 90

>> No.9081290 [View]

>>9081281
1 maybe 2

>> No.9081285 [View]

>>9081168
ANSWER THIS

>> No.9081283 [View]

>>9081219
>heterogeneous?
like a landscape mosaic. You want many different niches for the shroomies to occupy
learn about adaptive radiation
many agar gradients and every thing else you can think of.
you are gonna want a lot of biodiversity, functional and genetic, at every scale of analysis. so when selecting your cultures and isolating strains have that in mind, polyphenisms would be particularly helpful. This means you should incorporate as many species of fungi plants and animals as possible without ending up with an entropic mess. Read about behavioral evolution, eco evo, evo devo, and eco evo dynamics. Biodiversity science, complexity, phenology aswell as the obligatory genetics.
Maybe there are simpler, less interesting ways

>> No.9081209 [View]

>>9081204
do this and spawn selected strains on an very heterogeneous media for many generations

>> No.9081204 [View]

>>9081201
learn how to isolate strains

>> No.9081200 [View]

>>9081184
he is one of those "science, fuck ya" people that happens to be a bogerguys tyrant

>> No.9081188 [View]

>>9081138
trump is giving elon musk ownership of NASA to put a Taco Bell cantina on the moon, read his budget plan.
Its a well known fact that crispr is the leading cause of science cancer next to chemtrails. It is theoretically linked to science autism as well

>> No.9081168 [View]

>>9081139
tell me how 3 is a distinct entity and not just a boundary arbitrarily drawn around 1 1 1

>> No.9081159 [View]

>>9081132
>We're not too good at distinguishing one from another without using collected data, which we have really only had for a few hundred years.
this isnt true and anyone who has studied traditional ecological knowledge in minor detail should know that. People living a traditional life typically have more general knowledge about the living world around them than anyone else. For reasons that should be obvious. We are innately good at pattern recognition

>> No.9081128 [View]
File: 21 KB, 264x334, GXPE9951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9081128

>>9081123
>Ah yes, "emergent properties". Another word for magic.

>> No.9081118 [View]

>>9081084
>Why is fear-disgust of arthropods cross-culturally present in humans?
actually the emotions of fear and disgust are not cross-culturally present in humans. because they are concepts ascribed to a certain emotion in a certain context and not actual emotions in themselves

>> No.9081106 [View]

>>9081090
https://youtu.be/j5-yKhDd64s

>> No.9081091 [View]

>>9081084
its not
>What evolutionary pressure could create this response?
memes

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]