/sci/ - Science & Math

ecological society hopefully

>>9950129
National Socialism was identifiably leftist on just about any measure you can come up with _except_ being capitalists, irrationalist, dictatorial, ultra nationalist, ect
fascists are leftists now, sure.

>>9956548
plenty of people do fieldwork and nothings stopping you, you just have to try hard enough

>>9956352
you can always just go do field research, the literature is readily available, go learn the science and practices methodology.
You can get pretty far with something like botany just by reading and going out in the field, throw in the soil survey and the ecology literature and even better/ you could do that while studying something like floristics, you can get goods like this. best to commune with big bio biologists to learn your stuff, you can send pretty much anyone an email. The hardest part is the horrible absence of life in the world nowadays.
Doing field work as a passion is really the only way to do things, people who cant keep themselves out of the field, or the lab or wherever are the people that contribute to science, especially with life sciences, the systematic study of the living world is what we humans have always done, we shouldn't be detached from life, we shouldn't let how we live be capitalized like this. People dont really have traditional systems of knowledge anymore or have many real connections to the world around us, so its essential to our health to go out and seek it.

>>9953717
Based, study plant biology, start a bioprospecting lab, attract investors and move to Suriname. Get some lab rats to do all the actual bioprospecting while you stay out in the field identifiying plants and doing systematic studies all day.
That's what I would do.

>>9954111
>The scientific method
Which one?

>>9945910
It's almost like. . There are modes of socialism that are dramatically different in function.
Socialism is a spectrum

>>9945030
>Implying that the mining company wouldn't hoard iron maintaining artificial scarcity
This is only true if astroids were commons, they're aren't any commons left in the industrialized world, the capitalists made sure of that early on.
They might be "commons" in the sense that the ocean or Antarctica are "commons", which aren't really commons but are collectively owned and governed by nation states and exploitable to the pleasure of international business to the point that geopolitics allows.
You wish capitalism would be that easy to destroy, by that logic European colonialism of the new world would have ended capitalism and resulted in post scarcity. But it didn't, because property, investment and state sovernity were still around, same goes for space.
Anyways investors won't have reason to sink money into space after 2050(ecological and economic catastrophes) and don't really have any reason to do so now.

>>9944696
>Cringe. Your larping is obvious to everybody.
Sorry for party rocking

>>9944157
Kill yourself

>>9944147
I was hedging when you were still suckling at your momma's teat retard.
I will tell you what happens when you talk to people. . they go away, because you are an autistic asshole.

>>9944134
theist religions are dumb. The folk religious beliefs described under the umbrella term of animism are close to the matter of fact.

>>9944137
Blow it out your ass faggot

>>9944126
I like to look at fish and count coral buddy, that's what I want to do. I don't like it when the things I like die.

>>9944095
Fak u
>>9944097
Cringe, you failed life, don't blame based life science lol

>>9944093
idk man, if you have a degree in biodiversity surely you have systematic interests, what kind of things do you want to study?
Idk learn botany and soil science and start modelling ecotones or something.
I hate to see someone get a degree in something so epic only to let the opportunity go to waste. Take some initiative.

>>9944072
Dont you dare talk trash about ecology and biodiversity. The market values trash over life.
Yeah, learn R if you are a cuck. More importantly take the initiative to specialize yourself and go get some grant money, what do you do with biodiversity, surely you have more to prove yourself than just a degree? What do you read about? Are you good at stats? How are you as a systematist?
Put everything you got into doing good at grad school, it sounds like you are way behind if you already have a degree and aren't researching yet.

if we do it will be sort lived. we are about to get hit hard by the rapid degradation of the biosphere and its climate and will be struggling between feeding ourselves and geopolitics.
Capitalism destroyed any chance at non dystopian cyberpunk, in the future investors wont really have any motivation from the market to sink capital into space mining, that is if we are unfortunate enough to still have investors and capital.

Let me namedrop some relevant names to move towards the study such things in a proper philosophy and notation.
Peirce(the triad and categories)
Deleuze
Simondon
Bateson
Deacon
Whitehead
Bergson

ignore any dialectic or analytic methodology

>>9940002
well time is not a quality it is a relationship and a process.
see Peirce, Whitehead, Deleuze and Bergson.

>>9940006
>>9940023
>Is it pulling from the future, or pushing from the past?
>attraction, obviously, goes both ways.
it is moving towards the future by the affections of the past.
"attraction" only goes one way, towards the becoming of potential, relation goes "both ways", to the virtual openness of becoming and the closed actualities of being that set the boundaries of potential and thus the openness of becoming. There really aren't two ways to go, it is a continuous relation of animated wholes that are animated by there relationship to potential rather than the relationship to actual entities (relationship between actual entities, substance and systems) by which they're defined in quality and quantity. What you need to accept here is the ontological primacy of relation to that of the other categories. >>9940020
>>9940917
>a system.
>It is a dimension.
cringe
>>9942487
yikes!
>>9942664
close but you are still putting quality over relation.
>>9942768
thats why you ask me instead of a physicist >>9943282
>time is a wave
the form of the relation that is time may well be a wave but time is not a wave.
zomg im so much smarter than everyone else

let me fix that for you, ill make it scientific using Petersonian categorical notation

Alright morons, mark my words. Biosemiotics finna unify the life sciences. Once biology is grounded in; a relational ontology of meaning, and a process of meaning making. The study of life will be elevated to terms on par with math and physics, mark my words.

>>9941356
Do you honestly believe this nonsense?
White people are doing fine, the esjaydubbas ain't coming to get you. Stop watching YouTube polemics and read a book.

>>9941337
>today's modern secular equivalent is being white.
Anon. . . Lay off the cringe comps