/sci/ - Science & Math

At one point the universe was lowering in magnitude of acceleration. There is no way of telling what the acceleration will be like in the future.

>Hello pseudo/sci/ence
>/lit/ here,

Not a problem here, but he just referred to science as opposed to an individual or establishment.
Time to check out /lit/ if it actually is totally /b/.

as the value of the denominator gets smaller and approaches zero, the quotient approaches infinity. Infinity is not a defined number, so x/0 is undefined. This is why your high school teacher said the answer is "both infinity and undefined" in calc 101.

Given the spoonful is exactly the same for both scoops:

when the cream is poured into the coffee, a small fraction of cream will remain near the top of the cup of coffee. When you then proceed to take a spoonful of coffee, a small amount of cream will be taken back into the cup of cream. The transfer of coffee to the cream cup has a small % of cream, which varies. Take a look at my diagram. I show one case where most of the cream is returned to the cream cup, and another where very little cream is returned. In both "extreme" cases, the difference is the same. Taking a quick look at some middle ground, I noticed that the result was the same.

>>3942098
ooo you kept it!
I like that one too.
I would dump, but I'm on my friend's mac downtown.
I'm derping hotkeys everywhere.

>>3942054
Not my best work,
but you're still beautiful.

>>3942047
EK emote pix plz. I wanna draw
Baby.

One pizza to rule them all.

>>3941994
>>3941988
EK pix plz. I wanna draw.

v2 = 0 m/s
d = 1800 m
t = 60 s
a = (v2 - v1)/t
v2² = v1² + 2ad

v2² = v1² + 2d(v2/t - v1/t)
v2² - 2dv2/t = v1² - 2dv1/t
0 = v1² - 2dv1/t
0 = v1² - (2*1800/60)v1
0 = v1(v1 - 60)

v1 = 0 or 60 m/s

>>3768789
Shit, times three.
Heres a fix.

>>3768789
26 sry

Damn abnormal replies.

Anyways, here you go.

>>3751206
Homemade fleshlights have to either be cleaned hard or disposed of. In my solution, you only need to dispose of the plastic wrap after use. Just wrap it in toilet paper and flush it. I'm pretty sure your laundry gets done somehow too.
Plastic wrap has fairly low friction against cloth and you are adding pressure with you hands, which is variable as opposed to settling for whatever the fleshlight you have produced feels like.

>>3751192
It does. Shirts grip to eachother naturally, plus you are folding them tight so it will hold. Did you ever try to open up a tightly folded shirt before you put it on? It's pretty annoying sometimes.

>>3751187
You're adding padding to your hands. You can still control the pressure, plus you get heat and a really good mu. It beats pussy by a long shot sometimes. The only thing better is a blowjob.

>>3751148
Thats not jacking off. Even if you had a wife you might want to jack off at one point in the marriage. So what would u do if theres no pussy around?

Given household items, what would be the best way to masturbate by creating the best simulation of a pussy? Take into consideration clenliness and ease.
Here is my idea.

>>3750398
It's my own copy pasta, but yea.

>>3750385
The only way to complete the set of possible factors is an exhaustive inquiry to all girls (their brains, not what they say.). We can make a general form of the equation as:
x^3= [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))]*Σk(p)^z
where p = the percentile of a factor of interest given all available men
z = the exponent which scales the change in significance as percentile increases. Increases in z increases the value of higher percentiles. Decreases in z increases the value of lower percentiles.
k = a constant which determines how much a woman values any given p, relative to all other k in the sum.


Also, the percentile p is determined by each girl and what she considers to be better, for any given factor. I believe it will always be a percentile when a factor is considered. If a girl thinks you're just hot, it either means she'll fuck anyone or there is actually a comparison being made in her mind that she is not aware of. Thus, it is almost always a comparison meaning that a better and worse will almost always exist. It follows that a percentile can be formed. If she'll fuck anyone or has an indifference to any p, then z = 0.

>>3750371

>X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( √B + (1/2) * √S )
Lets look at √B. The common trend is that if you have a better body than some, it's good. As you surpass a larger % of individuals, the difference is less significant since you are already better then more and more ppl, so you are less and less more sexy to a girl. The same can be applied to √S. If you are second last, its is a huge difference from being last, compared to increasing intelligence percentile from 60 to 61. The exception in both cases is being the best. I didnt bother factoring this in, and my equation is vastly simplified, but i believe it holds for average quantities like percentiles of 50. ( √B + (1/2) * √S ) is multiplied by [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] which is a time ratio. The more time you spend with girls, the higher the chance is that you will be attractive to girl(s). Simply put: what you are, given by ( √B + (1/2) * √S ), multiplied to the amount of time you spend with girls in a given time frame, is your attractiveness to girls. (x^3 has no units since hours / hours cancels out.). I guess x^3 can be seen as success with girls, and not attractiveness to girls.

There is a finite set of girls who would consider intelligence to be attractive. We can state that B and S are both multiplied by a consideration factor k and w. We now have:
X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( k√B + w√S )
B and S are not the only factors that girls look at. I couldn't think of any before, but z√W where W = wealth is a factor.

>All women are attracted to intelligence.
>Most of us here interact with women enough to hook up.
We're all too busy posting instead of chillin wit bitchez. If you increase the frequency of interaction with girls, the higher the chance is that you will hook up.
X^3 = [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] * ( √B + (1/2) * √S )
x^3 = sexy time
Tw = Time with women
B = Body Impressiveness Percentile
S = Intelligence Percentile
B and S are are {S, B | 0 ≤ S ≤ 100, 0 ≤ B ≤ 100}

Let's assume a fair time balance of [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))]
= 10.7142%
I got this number from the following scheme of hours spent per day in a week:
Sn= 0, M= 0, T= 4, W= 0, Th= 4, F= 4, S=6
Tw / Week = 18h
A week has 168 hours
So, [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] = 18/168 = 3/28
Assuming passing low end B = 40th Percentile and S = 10th Percentile,
we get x^3 = 0.8470 This is my approximation of the minimum threshhold of x^3 that we must achieve in order to be attractive to women.

on /sci/,
{[Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] | 0 ≤ [Tw / (Tw + ¬(Tw))] << 0.001}
{S | 40 ≤ S ≤ 99} {B | 0.001 ≤ B ≤ 50}
(The exception to B is for engineers, but they are gay.)
So in the best case scenario on /sci/,
x^3 = 0.001 * (√50 + 0.5*√99)
x^3 = 0.01204 << 0.8470.
So in my projected best case scenario, a /sci/ posesses insufficient qualities to be attractive to women. ∎

Eugenics has numerous ethical and political issues attached to it.
The only fair proposition is to enlarge all penises and tighten all vaginas. Also, the clitoris should be relocated inside the vagina and a clitoris must be added to the penis.

GENTLEMEN.

I CAVE UNCOVERED A SOLUTION.