[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8046584 [View]

>>8046573
>Milankovitch
I bet that cycle was ""discovered"" by the Soviets?

>> No.8045947 [View]

>>8045800
Are tensor products the same as tensors?

>> No.8044325 [View]

>>8043516
I am in a "highly-rated" CS program in America, and the first lambda a CS major is likely to see is in their PL class, which is upper division and has upper division prerequisites

>> No.8042473 [View]
File: 26 KB, 150x150, ssavatar.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8042473

>>8040720
>tfw my school's math classes only go up to 200 level

A-am I in a school for brainlets? ;_;

>> No.8042398 [View]

Cognitive Science

>> No.8041215 [View]

Good thing to see /sci/ has /size/ threads now

>> No.7980848 [View]

Your image, though, which isn't an actual physical object, could move faster the the speed of light

>> No.7980830 [View]

>>7980827
not enough haskell at universities

>> No.7980794 [View]

Quantum consciousness
Flat Earth Theory
Qualia
1 + 2 + 3 + .... = -1/12

>> No.7980788 [View]

poor raccoon :(

>> No.7979912 [View]

hello rat-o

>> No.7979684 [View]

>>7979636
>meme tutorial: the meme site

>> No.7979623 [View]

>>7979363

λλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλ
haskell
haskell
h a s k e l l
ハスケル
λλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλλ

>> No.7976893 [View]

>>7976891
Assuming you mean consciousness in the qualia sense

>> No.7976891 [View]

There is no guarantee that consciousness even exists. You could just be a robot believing you are conscious.

>> No.7976881 [View]

>>7976854
Mainly I see it used in typing rules and defining semantics

>> No.7976873 [View]
File: 28 KB, 533x400, flatlight.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7976873

>>7976853
I mean that we are accelerating at 9.8 m/s^2 in our own reference frame. Relative to a stationary object the level of acceleration would of course go down as time went on.

>>7976804
It's accelerated up, but then there has to be (from our own reference frame) a corresponding drop in lateral velocity.

Curving upwards causes the effect of the horizon like in pic related.

>> No.7976844 [View]

>>7976802
I mean when formally defining a language, not as actual part of the language.

>> No.7976793 [View]

I've seen inference rules used both for defining the type and value of expressions in a programming language. I think Epigram actually uses inference rules in the form of stuff under/over a bar for giving type signatures.

>> No.7976776 [View]

>>7976754
1) Antarctica is the edge of the Earth and goes all the way around.
2) The sun is a spotlight, and only shines on certain parts of the Earth at a time, since light curves upwards (so past a certain distance, the light would no longer strike Earth's surface). Same with the moon.
3) Documented what? You can find the answers to these questions at https://wiki.tfes.org/FAQ

>> No.7976759 [View]

>>7976747
Linear Algebra

>> No.7976748 [View]

>>7976719
you know search results are different for each person?

>> No.7976738 [View]

>>7976725
The reason we feel gravity is because the Earth is being accelerated upwards at 9.8 m/s^2. Light actually experiences this acceleration directly, as do celestial objects. However, the light is lighter than the Earth, so accelerates slightly faster. Thus it curves upwards, creating the illusion of a horizon.

>> No.7976688 [View]

>>7976681
It was a whistleblower from NASA (notice the similarity with NSA?)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]