/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15285875
i got the first part right i didnt understand what it meant by w in the second part am i supposed to integrate and then solve? idk... help please

Could any anon please help me with this?
Whenever I try to pass a name as an argument, say function("Alex", &head, &tail), it says it expects a char, not a char (*)
also, in the original node, the variable "name" is declared as a char[10], so in strcmp, n->info.name is also considered a char (when im given the error message)
Obviously, I'm doing smth wrong but I can't tell what
How do i pass a full name to compare it to that part of the node? Thx in advance

what do you consider to be basic chemistry knowledge/skills everyone should have?

>>11490612
I think the total opposite is going to happen. Its not that we need more automation. Its that the average worker is what props up the ones at the top. Thats the problem. The ones at the top have to go. Thats the only option. If that happens the economy will naturally sort its self out. I mean literally naturally. Those who can do things can still do them. But all our priorities as a collective are whats going to matter. So chances are technology will change drastically. We care about technology mostly for its value in entertainment. Like how we are all using the computer right now to talk to each other. Or netflix to watch things. Humans will want that to continue.

Lets say this does take maybe a quarter of people. That means that everything will change from that point on. We all better start hoping praying and thinking about how much better the world will be only if we completely destroy technology as we know it now. There's no other way out. It's sad and scary but true. Im scared. But we cant do what we are doing now. We are killing the earth and this wont work. It just wont. Billionaires wont work. We better expect death if we dont change now. I mean. Now...

>>11490524
A lot of older white guys especially.

>>11487527
So will 25% of people. I bet.

Have any of the survivors had brain damage? Why do we think that the lungs & liver are the only organs being targeted here. What if the real goal is the brain. To alter human behavior?

>>11487437
Cope.

>>11487391
>high mutation rate of RNA viruses and their nature to go seasonal by avoiding immunity.

Explain this slowly please.

>>11487386
Yea, how do you know its man made? Cos ChInA?

>>11487344
Okay that makes sense but since we've never seen one like this before why should it behave that way?

What if we socially isolate and only think that the death toll stops. What if in some way this would actually aid the virus in mutation? Because once it comes in contact with its self again the way each individual human had built up an immunity will collide with each others and make the next mutation even stronger. Since the virus will have all the information of those people who had individually built an immunity. Somehow keeping germs isolated in separate chambers then expecting society can ever come back together and be normal again? It seems so incredibly unwise.

And haven't viruses been responsible for leaps in evolution. Horizontal gene transfer right? What if the earth is trying to push not human extinction to save it's self but more rapid human evolution to save it's self instead? Like this is not a plague that is occurring its another 'missing link'?

>>11487310
Reading just this one post was so validating. Thank you. We can't fight the virus if we can't mutate WITH it... like along with it. But, it feels like I'm crazy. Like I'm the only one to have this thought. But everyone thinks the government is right. No one sees how much humans were the problem to start with.

>>11487310
Thank you. Finally someone else sees what I see. Yea they would be slaughtered. If they weren't already dead from the virus.

>>11487278
What do you mean? Unironically I'm stupid you need to explain like I'm a child.

Fuck you guys. I'm gonna ask /pol/. Are you faggots happy I'm going to fucking pol for scientific conversation? I hope your happy.

>>11487192
I told you to explain like I'm 5 and that I'm a noob. No reason to be excessively sarcastic like a 14 year old who just read nietzsche. Just entertain what I'm saying for one second. Or explain from the bottom up why I need to be socially isolated instead of trying to catch corona. If I get an immunity who cares if I spread it to others and they die? What if they virus mutates faster than say the flu, and I need to have the first in order to survive its evolution?

>>11487190
Artist is Charlie Immer and name is Sweet Skeleton. It's an oil painting I believe. Pic unrelated okay?

Sci noob here. Someone explain like Im 5 why social isolation is best for covid19.

Again, I'm a noob, so this is just a really creative theory BUT what if the virus gets worse? I mean what if (in theory) there is something wrong with the system fundamentally. I mean the whole 'use Clorox and wash your hands' parts even. I know what you are thinking. What kind of idiot doesn't want to wash their hands during a global pandemic? My point is what if our excessive use of these types of products encourages their growth or mutation. When really we should of been trying to integrate with these things and be filthier to build up an immunity?

stuck on these last problems on hw can anyone help?

>>9815123
>>9815126
>>9815127
>>9815131
>>9815133
>>9815134
>>9815135
>>9815137
screencap. I will comeback later.

>>9815137
If you dont mind me asking. How did you get along all of this topics. They seem so fucking interesting.