/sci/ - Science & Math

test

>>15732471
Fuck j@ws

>>15732469
Ex - china

And how much it costs to build a quantum computer.

>>15547558
I dont do podcast

Just read this
https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ep.13041

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FtIoaLaWYAEyPv6?format=png&name=small

>>15318362
>time would be the same for us as that greater organism
Ugh. People have really reached rock bottom intelligence wise. Everything everyone says is stupid.

>>15308167
>Vaccinated
More like vegginated, lol.

>>15023636
Then why was i born ugly

Picrel describes me so well
For the past few months after deciding to take a break from school i have literally done nothing except being a awfully depressed NEET. I was like this when i dropped out of highschool as well. I am not particularly smart either and ive been neglecting my mental issues including adhd and depression, anxiety, schizo personality..etc.
My sleeping schedule is beyond fvcked which seems to worsen the forementioned issues, making me feel almost paralyized, incapable of learning/understanding new concepts, even the things i used to enjoy. Idk i just felt like rambling sorry if this is a stupid post

>>14762257
idk I guess society wants to pick what people deserve what job and a test that fails at predicting success is being used to determine who can sit next to me in cs lectures. They linear think and I dont, surely there has to be a separator between people that got to where I am by getting good at that test only to be inept all around. IQ is mostly unpreparable and I am working on an IQ test that is completely unpreparable. All im saying is that society is retarded and accidents happen cause we cant acknowledge that there are geniuses in poor neighborhoods and buisnesses want us to think rich have higher iqs and sat is fairer

>>14762223
yeah my bad I type 98 wpm on phone. But when are we gonna take down the college board and establish gattaca

My goal in this thread is to prove colleges are essentially daycares and we need to assert our dominance on psuedo intellectuals because while you may let them win their own little game they are still fundamentally a problem to society when putting inept people in professional places. They dont get good ever. They just get good at taking tests.

>>14762128
Im saying the complete opposite of that. Perhaps im not good with words. IQ would make everyone objectively better as a procedure for setting us on better paths.

>>14762124
I provided my claim and its only 0.2 related to success while iq is 1.0 so it essentially is a checkmate. However family income only means income per house hold and you are implying all of these individuals are married. Implications and personal conclusions have no place in this discussion

>>14762112
The reason this is way worse than that though is because it hurts the average person from earning more than 30k by condemning them to have less opportunities. If the tests were to predict success more accurately then the average person would make 60k.

"SAT math and ACT scores each exhibit robustly positive correlations of 0.22 with household income. However, the correlations between household income and metrics like high school GPA and high school graduation rank are less than half as strong, ranging from 0.06 to 0.10." TLDR: SAT barely predicts success while IQ directly predicts success. If what our test score is trying to do is tell colleges who they should invest in, then clearly they want to reward less adaptable and fast people.

>>14762084
what the fuck is this supposed to prove? Is this some sort of "you should be thankful you live now" thing? This is such a retarded statement.

>>14762082
just google SAT vs income

>>14761994
I dont understand (this still supports my claim)? im saying intelligence measure of this is very similar to iq and predicts income at 60k for the average person administered. If we look at the 30k margin the SAT predicts the average person to be, it falls under 20 or 80 iq. This means that theres more inequality in the SAT than in a standard intelligence test.

forgot to mention 60 is 100 iq in the armed forces grading system and the other mark is the average income for the average SAT score

lets be real, Everyone would be getting payed better if we were determined our careers based on our iq rather than mastering psuedo test taking. The SAT has been proven to make grading stricter when they want more revenue and the randomness of the grading has put more idiots making more money than the average intelligence.

depends which autism. I dont think alot of severely autistic folk can lift up their own weight. However the autists who are introverted have dependency on themselves and do not demand help from the system or mention of their autism as an excuse for getting extra time on things. Most autists only have a 105 iq anyways and think they are the next elon musk that ive met.