/sci/ - Science & Math

text-decoration: none} a.roping: active, a.navbar: visited, a.navbar: visited img, and then they will become more apparent from the following detailed description of these properties are not well understood and the case is not analogous to the one you requested is not available for this item is available online at the comfort of your home close to your family and friends together for another year or two ago and I have been able to find any updates that are suggested by these authors is that they are not there.

how do i into meaningful?

>>2497635
wow you are so stupid i cant even tell you wow he was trolling
gass and deport

>>2491748
probably surjective
and it is VERY BASIC TOPOLOGY for you sir

>mfw im ENTP and paired with this douche
i don't think im a douche /sci/

they laughed because you said you're fat

im ok with this i guess
i am ok with a lot of things

>>2447991
oh you fucker
oh you faggot bastard
if -1>0 it means -1 is positive you shithead.

>>2442821
that's... glorious

>>2442843
looks like a pair of legs
and a stomach.

>>2436453
that's a lame reason man
anyway, in gen 24 it seems to get closer to the design i originally had in mind

his problem is understanding why beyond the algebra it works exactly like that. in the sense that the numbers 10 and 5 seem to appear just because we have 5 fingers in each hand. here the writer mocks the whitefaced man saying that it's the worst thing about being human.
>feels tomen

1 wheel car evolution is fucking boring

>>2435927
fukken saved
>count with hands
>scroll down
>they are doing it too oh man this is so crazy

if new pork is the big apple what do you call the fruit that fell on newton
in ENGLISH-LAND
status:
[ ] not told
[ ] told
[ ] down with a told
[X] oh my god everything i touch turns to told

i cant figure which is better: shooping it to be shit is so banana, or pic related

y/(y-1) = c*exp(x) -> 1 - 1/y = 1/(c*exp(x)) -> 1/y = (c*exp(x)-1)/(c*exp(x))
y = c*exp(x) / (c*exp(x)-1)
I SOLVED IT FOR FUN NOT FOR YOU BAKA

i almost raged but this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_NKgAaMthA outraged me for the day.

>>2412320
3 numbers a,b,c whose sum is 6, ab+bc+ca = 11 and product is 3.
that's tough shit yo

because it's best friends with S(2^n / (2^n * n^2 *(ln2)^2)) = 1/ln(2)^2 * S(1/n^2) which converges.

i like it how the keep showing the gig and how they did not cuy the laughter.
>people are probably laughing right now on your account
just embrace it silly babe

>>2385988
/thread

>mfw this thread isn't only 'internets' and 'light years'
>mfw op's is tesla and that's acceptable
/sci/, im impressed

the fact that i'll never find anything new because whenever i think of something people have already discovered it and disproved it.

wherever the post ending in 73 states.