[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.7972838 [View]

>>7972824
It has nothing to do with truth, idiot. Science is not about truth, it's about facts. Facts can be wrong, but until you PROVE them wrong by replacing them with better facts they are still facts. AGW is a fact, get over it, loser.

>> No.7971793 [View]

>>7971791
> sjwtard is trying to form an opinion about what scientists should take seriously
kek.

>> No.6761949 [View]
File: 334 KB, 500x493, tumblr.red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6761949

>>6761940
>>6761931
>>6761933
..... I would appreciate seriousness, you fuckers!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am JUST ASKING A QUESTION TO STUDY, SHITLORD

>> No.6722400 [View]

>>6719912
As a certified neetitician, I prescribe slightly less than two drinks and to watch K-on until you fall asleep.

>> No.6385950 [DELETED]  [View]

>>6385947
Harriet has always made quality posts on this board. He is not a shitposter.

>> No.6385943 [View]

>>6385938
That's offensive, reported

>> No.5778623 [View]

>>5778619
Sound?
Or you mean that what I write reads like it?
The sound of it is your own subjective interpretation.

And yes, but I stopped using this tripcode.

>> No.5588117 [View]

>>5588090
I just prefer not to.
But it was not banned.

>> No.5166762 [View]

>>5166758
I am fine, and I hope that you are too.
But I have to go.

>> No.5166759 [View]

>>5166753
Hello.

You got lucky; there is no way you could have known that was me.

Stop guessing.

>> No.5106328 [View]

>>5106324
>Why not? You're her room mate.
Fine. I will mention that somebody on /sci/ says that they miss her.

>What is she doing?
That is not your concern.

>> No.5106318 [View]

>>5106309
No.
And I can not tell her what to do anyway.

She is quite busy at the moment.

>> No.5106305 [View]

>>5106304
'Grinch' specifically means being un-Christmassy.

>> No.5106177 [View]

>>5106166
If there is no evil, then there is no opportunity to do good things, and being a 'good person' is impossible.

>> No.5106154 [View]

>>5106151
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism

>> No.5106108 [View]

>>5106100
>But I don't want to be left to my beliefs; if he has evidence of God I would like him to share it with me.
He does not.
If any of them did, they would show it.
The best that they have is an image that vaguely looks like Jesus, grilled into a piece of toast.

It is about faith, not evidence.
If there was evidence, they would not need faith.

>> No.5106103 [View]

>>5106097
Because I am the only one here who is not an arrogant loud-mouthed atheist who wishes to force their beliefs on everybody else?

Religion can bring peace of mind and a lot of happiness to people.
Do not try to rob them of it.

It is like going over to a young child who still believes in Santa Claus and ruining it for them.

Yes, you are correct, but that is not the point.

>> No.5101366 [View]

>>5101360
I am not promiscuous.

https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/?task=search2&ghost=&search_text=harriet&search_su
bject=&search_username=ek&search_tripcode=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&sea
rch_dateto=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&amp
;search_res=post

She did not say nice things, but she did, at least, not say that.

>I am not trying to "stir up trouble" at all.
Yes you are, troll.
I am not responding to you again.

>> No.5101354 [View]

>>5101330
It does not logically follow that enjoying video games makes one an anti-intellectual.

>>5101332
I do not believe that she ever said that about me.
You will provide a link to what she said from the archives, or you are lying.
I have searched my own name from an archived lists of her posts, and it does not appear that she has ever said that about me.
You are just trying to stir up trouble and make us dislike each other based on your lies and false gossip.

>>5101334
Actually it does :)
My posts are so clearly correct that there is nothing they can say to further the argument, other than to make their own position as a troll far more clear to all observers.

>> No.5101327 [View]

>>5101321
Doing what?

>> No.5101324 [View]

>>5101319
Incorrect.
Non-sequitur.

>> No.5101316 [View]

>>5101303
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-intellectualism

"Anti-intellectualism is hostility towards and mistrust of intellect, intellectuals, and intellectual pursuits, usually expressed as the derision of education, philosophy, literature, art, and science, as impractical and contemptible."

Does not apply to me in the slightest.
I like learning, and I enjoy the company of intelligent people.
I would never obstruct anybody who was attempting to learn.

That is not even an insult, troll.
It is merely a lie about me.

>>5101305
That is also a lie.

>> No.5101301 [View]

>>5101283
>You are an anti-intellectual.
No I am not.

>> No.5101278 [View]

>>5101230
I disagree.
What have I done that is horrible?
I was just trying to help people with the IQ test.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]