/sci/ - Science & Math

pump $MYASS

>>15996484
cuase you didnt try hard enough. keep trying.

>Anon absolutely ass blasted because he tried to make a spaceflight general but people are using the other one which was created earlier
>Anon demanding that the jannies come save him so he can collect (You)'s
>Anon ranting in the actual general and now making new off-topic thread shitting up the board because he's a fucking nutjob
So many such cases, have you considered doubling their pay?

>>15661310
Well, the lk99 troon is supposedly going to release their shit in the next 1-3 days after which they're going to abandon the account because they've attracted too much attention to themselves including multiple people that want to dox them and try to get the FSB on their ass for being a deranged troon with multiple personalities. On the saner fronts, it's looking less like a scam by the Koreans and more just that the documentation they've released is shit or missing important info (some of which can be found in their multiple patents). Supposedly you need to remove the elements that make it a superconductor (with helium maybe?) and also quench it with an ice bath (maybe?). Ice bath and helium might be BS but the removal of the impurity is mentioned in the patents.

>>15590105
Didn't read lol

>>15535036
>>15535072
Why does /sci/ have so many stuck up, arrogant zipperheads?

>>15470690

>>15358819
The real give away for bots is that they spam shitty sõyjaks

>>15343008
Did you take your meds?

>>15273791
>What would you have suggested he do instead
nothing

>>15058644
>The worst thing is, I’m losing the ability to mask in social situations. I can’t even crack a smile when somebody makes a joke anymore without looking like I’m malfunctioning.
it's normal bro. i'm 30. your ability to detect bullshit gets enhanced around this age and as a result you stop giving a fuck about a lot of things

>>15060354
maybe i'm a retard, but this is what i don't get. you're generating the data with a traditional simulation anyway, so in practical terms what's to gain from from a PINN, if it has to be retrained for varying sets of ICs/BCs anyway? is it possible to train an operator which can simply step forward in time regardless of ICs/BCs? (i've seen examples of this but they're not physically constrained)

>>15059787
curious to see your work, can you post a pre print here?

>>14818522
who tf is going to read any of that nigger stfu

>>14801482
>Todays engineers have substituted COAE in place of COAM because that is what works experimentally.
Sure idiot: engineers use one equation while thinking they are using another one. All of them. Without any of them ever noticing. LOL.

>They just don’t comprehend that they are literally directly contradicting the “law” of conservation of angular momentum.
Yeah, sure: all engineers don't really have a clue what they are doing and yet they somehow get things to work. That makes sense...

Sounds much more likely to me that a random retard on 4chan has no fucking clue what he is talking about.

>>14795820
> Kepler is not confirmed by any modern measurements and that is why you present your fantasy instead of evidence.

Completely made-up. I showed you evidence and you decided to ignore it because you are not only an ignorant moron and an insufferable cunt but also an intellectually dishonest weasel. This is exactly why you are being treated like a flatearther: you are basically the same thing. Fucking retard.

>>14795780
> Nope. Those are the genuine principles of science and you imagine that you can change the principles of science to suit you if you want.
The uninformed opinion of an uneducated moron about what the principles of science are counts zero.

Take your meds and stop babbling nonsense regarding stuff you are utterly ignorant about retard.

>>14795756
> Nope. Nothing obeys Kepler’s second law. It is wrong.
Made-up flatearther-like nonsense.

> That is why you cannot show anything which directly confirms Kepler.
LOL. Here: https://theskylive.com/planetarium find me one object that is not where this thing (or the other thousand based on current orbital mechanics) predicts and come back to be or STFU forever, retard.

> All you have to fall back on is Brahe’s eyeball measurements from more than 300 years ago because his results are not repeatable using modern accuracy.
Sure John, we haven't observed a single object since the 1700's even those we discovered afterwards. That's some really delusional nonsense even for a moron like you.

This is why people call you a liar and laugh at everything you say, idiot.

>>14795746
Those are the principles of science as they are explained to an 8th grader. I can't help it if you never got past that. Come back to be when you completed kindergarten, idiot. Moreover, the predictions performed by a delusional cretin who understands fuckall of what he is doing and applied to a sloppy system that is not a proper experiment under any reasonable definition count exactly nothing.

12000 rpm only proves that you are a clueless moron who constantly babbles nonsense without having the slightest clue what he is talking about.

Take your meds and fuck off forever.

>>14795742
No retard. I addressed your shitty excuse of a paper extensively and factually and I don't give a fuck what a delusional lunatic who refuses to take his meds defines as "reasonably". Your so-called paper is crap and it has been clearly explained why. If that's beyond your room-temperature IQ (in Celsius) that's entirely your problem.

>>14788513
> Because everyone that argues against it is dismissed as an unhinged mental patient.
No, it is simply because nobody has yet come up with a viable alternative. Lots of scientists tried but couldn't produce theories that outperform relativity. Even more clueless crackpots rant about it without having any clue what they are talking about.

>>Replacing something usefully predictive with nothing would make knowledge impossible.
>That's the most unscientific statement currently on this board.
That's actually the underlying principle of science: theories are valid as long as they describe observable evidence at least better than any other alternative. Relativity 100% fulfils this definition. The uninformed rants of some clueless moron who knows shit about it is totally irrelevant in determining the validity of a scientific theory. Stop being Mandelbaurian and learn something about the principles of science.

>>14795579
Made-up nonsense. The moon, as any other celestial object, behaves exactly as predicted by Newton's laws, i.e. obeying Kepler's laws.

>>14795441
I addressed your not-a-paper and showed that it's 100% crap and why. Now take your meds and fuck off.

>>14795432
No retard. The system won't suddenly stop depending on those variables only to satisfy a moron who can't understand grown-up physics. The final speed obviously depends on the pulling time as demonstrated by your beloved LabRat and is easily proven to depend on the other effects I mentioned. Only a delusional cretin who knows shit about physics like you would think the contrary.

Take your meds and fuck off.