/sci/ - Science & Math

We have been deceive for thinking that the Riemann-Hypothesis(RH) is solvable! Its a grand propaganda to slow down mathematical research in the world, especially the United States!

>>6059190
>That's almost exactly what it is. Pathetic is worse than normal and natural and normal are almost synonymous.
Pathetic normalfag detected.

>>6058973 answers >>6058975 answers >>6058973

Also
>P.S. You won't believe my captcha.

Therefore captcha proof of authenticity:
>http://www.webcitation.org/6K1L5Fyuj

>>6056198
>Here in Germany we even have an kek named after him.
Don't worry, Marks & Spencer sells this kek in Britain under the label "Marks & Spencer Tea Biscuits". It's manufactured in the same kek plant in China as your Leibniz. Since 1891 ;-).

Okay, I'm lying a bit. Only a bit.

P.S. You won't believe my captcha.

>>6056198
>Here in Germany we even have an kek named after him.
Don't worry, Marks & Spencer sells this kek in Britain under the label "Marks & Spencer Tea Biscuits". It's manufactured in the same kek plant in China as your Leibniz. Since 1891 ;-).

Okay, I'm lying a bit. Only a bit.

>>6055722
>Time is change in entropy.
>Change in entropy is the 4th dimension of spacetime.
>So what are the remaining 3 dimensions?
Yeah... such simple questions... and all humans are too stupid to conceive answers.

WE, MONKEYS.

Not being gay
but maybe we shouldn't know the answers.

>>6055705
1. Isn't entropy a measure of randomness, or missing information? You've just said something like this yourself. I thought I was saying the same using different words.
2. Isn't "memory" just another word for "information"?

>>6055654
>Entropy is not memory.
Well, entropy is lack of memory. The glass is half-empty. Amirite?

>>6054171
>tfw we can never achieve star trek society
MY MAN.

>The problem with this community is everyone spends their time proving others are dumb instead of helping each other get smarter.
Can I help you ejaculate?

>>6054378
>What if the government is increasing the rates of autism so they can have more super geniuses so they can have more Manhattan projects and make more super weapons?
http://ddg.gg/Chinese_eugenics

>>6053556
>Tripfagging and being wrong. Nice combo.
Implying anonymity is for losers.
Confirmed loser.
Implying reputation is everything.
Confirmed sheep.

>>6054427
>Also why is he writing on a window?
To show off.

>>6048934
>Smarter Than Einstein
>now 14
>And he has a girlfriend too.
Extremely dangerous
young sex offender.

He needs help.

>>6054417
Maybe we should ask time.

>>6053952
>1380377337299.jpg
Passable!

>>6054156
>We could define Entropy as time

Entropy,
therefore memory.

So memory
is the only evidence of the past.

Without memory, time is nothing.

Now if memory could be manipulated... would that equal time travel?

Are mad men rudimentary time travellers?

I must go.

Good night, Anonymous.

Sleep well and ejaculate,

>>6051959
>Richard Dawkins Pedophilia Remarks Provoke Outrage

That there still remain men
with intellectual stamina and courage
in this world of lowlife
is a proof that God exists.

I'm in love with Richard Dawkins,

>>6055489
>But we make them so.
But we make them unequal.

Fixed.

>>6055379
>the false equality of the sexes
The old sexes aren't equal.
But we make them so.

Not sure about the new sexes postulated by me, I think they could be inherently unequal, therefore more certain and relevant than the old sexes. But I'm not sure.

>>6055377
>Fucking about with labels and restricting speech will never get females to start growing larger in general and with larger muscles.
But it will. It's called "upbringing" and it does nearly all the difference.

In my belief, existing data has been negatively selected to prove the dominating world view. Although there are some data supporting my view, they are scarce and often anecdotal. Yes, my conviction is driven by faith in addition to facts. Science without faith would stagnate. Your conviction, on the other hand, is marked by a shortage of scepticism for existing evidence.

>>6055364
I mean:

1. reinforces culturally constructed genders:
>A man who likes men is something entirely different from a woman who likes men.

>>6055302
>simple and practical
And useless. An intellectual burden slowing down free thinking.

And outright misleading. Because it:
1. reinforces culturally constructed genders:
>A man who likes men is homosexual but a woman isn't.
2. puts phallophiles and uterophiles in one bag, burying from view a difference vastly more important:
>A man who likes men and a woman who likes women = the same thing automatically.

>>6055324
>Don't bother, it's an addict probably.
At least I don't stink like you do.

>>6055283
>TL;DR: THIS GUY IS A FAG.
TL;DNR that guy is a lesbian.

>>6055222
>Why even bump this. It's plain fucking obvious, the male physique is superior.

Not really. I would say that male and female physiques are equally fucked up. Male genitals are very phallic but the rest of the male body – not so much. If you want to see a superior physique, see DmitrysFuta. Sadly, the nature (especially the Homo sapiens nature, or Yahweh) always strives to keep us frustrated and deprived. It's no different with sexuality. Therefore the human biology comes with an arsenal of barriers preventing DmitrysFuta from happening. The day we can break these barriers, we might conquer aging, illness, wars, poverty and death as well.

Not trying to spam DmitrysFuta, but it's very specific and it matches my discussed gender concept without flaw, unlike "transsexual", "shemale", "trap", "futanari" and a whole host of other terms that create confusion in >>>/d/. All hail Dmitrys for reading in my mind to invent the perfect gender.

>>6055176
>And now if we take into account, that lesbian is a particular case of gay...
>MIND=BLOWN

It's a matter of mending the caveman-era sexual terminology.

The lesbians that you are talking about might be not lesbian at all.

I'm commiting a practical cheapness by reclaiming the words "gay" and "lesbian" to suit my ends, but my abuse is no worse crime than their conventional use. "Homosexual" and "heterosexual" are... heterosexual concepts used to impose the heterosexual world order. If I wanted to be 100% precise, I should perhaps talk about "phallophile" instead of "gay" and "uterophile" instead of "lesbian".

I appreciate your analytical attempt.