/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10752173
lmao, well, we're actually one person ;)

>>10743110
>With the only thought as to how that will work is if i can think it as X then it must be X if i just throw a thought cloud at it for a few weeks.
It does sound like it could be naive to think this way

>But I think they might be attributing internal visualization as 'halucination'/externalization of Tulpas image.
What would you say that a tulpa truly is? Is it some division from the self perhaps? that perhaps first exists as just an internal visualization or say information or knowledge about the tulpa and as one learns more, it starts having autonomy of its own?

>These fall into the I need to study them with in-intrusive cameras and microphones to determine pathological lair from mental-case.
What do you thin about these last segment?

>And considering you've taken a mental precept much like my own as a superior pathway, not to mention playing with placidity. I feel that laying out reasoning's from one that's been in that state for over 25 years. It just might help you hop skip and jump the one legged race.
Well what can I tell you, I do think it's quite significant to learn more about the mental phenomena, especially because in some way it is common to all humanity, and some of our traits are also shared by other animals, and moreover independently of the context, our cognition is always with us, even though it does change under different situations, and it might be interesting to think that perhaps we would be completely different in an alien setting or we wouldn't even know how to act in the first place. Though even then, I think that the subject is all there is, and so it makes sense that all explorations are cognitive explorations, especially when new information is involved, and I appreciate that you're telling me all of this, and I thank you, though at the same time I think it would be all the more all the more relevant if we related it to projects that we're working on at the moment. Like an actual tulpa that we're building.

(cont)

bump

>>10739152
Ummm, where did I call it "example 1"? With the next example?

>>10739083
I really haven't focused much anymore on the method, though I do talk about it more or less at this hour on this website :p, and yes in other circumstances it would make sense that it would be a transparent case of getting caught up in procrastination.

Regarding whether it's anti-complexity or not, umm well you must keep some things in mind, like say, the fact that you have to remember that you have to limit your procrastination whenever you have a strong urge to procrastinate, that you must be patient with yourself when you don't feel very interested and take another strategy, to write down your distractions, and well maybe some of the frameworks I proposed above could help minimize the amount of things that you have to keep in mind.

>>10738227
>Also OP, the people in antiquity already figured all this out and wrote and pondered these exact same questions of yours in excruciating detail. Treat yourself to some classic natural philosophy as opposed to exposing yourself to the horrific, stale, rigified maggot filled corpse of modern day 'science', everyone here is a gigantic cum filled faggot.
LMAO, haha it's reminiscent of Nietzsche's conception of truth and Barthes' body explained in "Writing Degree Zero" (of the dead body and living body, such that the dead body represents the accepted sterile abstractions). I think there's some usefulness in reading about what people in antiquity already figured out, especially, because of its connection to philosophy and hence, it being more paradigmatic, such as in the case of the Stoics. However here you're talking about the natural philosohers and well it does make sense to read their works even if textbooks already suammarize what natural philosophers have discovered, for if one does it this way, in my opinion one can understand the significance of their achievements, be observers and coparticipants in the process of discovery, and realize where ideas actually come from, and that I'd find fascinating, and I assume that some have pondered about these questions though I'm not sure I can point which of the (natural) philosophers, what philosophers would you recommend me to read?

>>10736284
It boosts my self esteem, that this looks like a genuine question and for that I'm thankful to you :), but even then it would be a delusion to say that I understand the actual intention behind your question, so let me ask, why do you ask? and what's your understanding of genius?

>>10737942
lmao maybe I should indeed boof on some adderall but I can't at this moment given that I'm not seeing any psychiatrist but perhaps there might be a way to obtain such drugs without going to a psychiatrist?

>>10737953
That connected with the other post, reminds me of this article: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beautiful-minds/201201/must-one-risk-madness-achieve-genius-0, there's of course also the scientific article that deals with more or less the same topic but in a more empirically rigorous way, but I'll link to this one as a prologue to the scientific one for whoever is interested. Now, speaking about the quote, I do relate a lot with the imaginative freedom that is so ubiquitous in the invention of new mathematics. Moreover, it is meaningful to hear about this tendency to burn out early in one's career, that has happened to many of the most famous scientists.

>>10738227
Your method does seem quite consistent with some of the ideas proposed here, like say unloading your distractions in the metacognitive sketchpad, and understanding yourself instead of forcing yourself, though it's interesting your addition of not getting caught up or unloading one's uncertainty onto god or a deified entity, though I'm not sure I have specific examples in my experience that I can draw from to relate with those points. Can you relate some example from your life?

>>10731425
Oh that's quite interesting, I do more or less the same as you about taking lots and lots of notes about what I'm doing, and synthesizing my notes is a bit of a chore though I've been able to cope with it better, recently. Though I want to say that I'm not just speaking about taking notes, but more as if you were programming yourself, by instructing yourself what to do, what not to do, and getting involved on how to make these instructions a reality. I feel a bit confused at the end of your last sentence, are you telling me that it is extraordinary what you can realize while at the same time making updates about what you're doing?

>Keep doing you
Aww thank you! I like it that you appreciate me ^^

>>10731893
Well of course they are a philosophical tangle (though with some amount of specificity) rather than having empirical substance, the only empirical substance is my own life (but it has worked so far), though what I said here: >>10730910
was actually based on theories of other people (look "A unified theory of Psychology" and "DBT skills workbook") and it's my hypothesis that procrastination is a self-destructive behavior, because it all seems connected from the things I've learned recently :P
I agree with you on what you say about my syntax, and I wasn't realizing that it would be difficult for others to read, I appreciate that you expressed this to me

>>10731266
Ah but isn't it a kind of expected deconstruction? Like it would make sense if you deconstruct things in arbitrary ways and perhaps deconstruction might make you more creative in the sense of doing things differently than others until it runs out.

>>10730375
You should try it on yellow "SCHLOP" "SCHLOP"

>>10730276
Hehe I love that website!

>>10731261
I don't know but that looks a lot like the sunrise of "The Waves" by Virginia Woolf, so it's probably a sunrise

>>10731051
I can help give us your study materials and we could find the basic principles that you need to know for your exam so that you can come up with everything based on those small principles

I've been very, very productive for the last three days (and pretty much not a single day before that) and it has been the result from following my approach, so if you have ADHD then go ahead and try this out, you might find out it works for you too :)

>>10731148
honestly sounds like a bad approach, especially if you're trying to be creative

>>10730006
Read my thread: >>10719938

>>10730920
That looks pretty amazing desu

>>10730895
that image xD

>>10719938
I recently discovered that this can be understood as a specialization of emotional regulation skills, for procrastination is a behavior that one uses to cope with certain emotions, and though these self-destructive behaviors might lead to tempoary reward, in the long-term they are rather pernicious. Moreover, a way to deal with such self-destructive behaviors is by recognizing them in the same way that you recognize the procrastinations that you're having in the metacognitive sketchpad, and thus it makes sense to think about the whole contribution system, how by pursuing those actions you're affected in the small term and the long-term, and recognizing alternatives that can lead to better coping while not judging yourself for being this way ^w^

So apparently self-awareness is involved in self-regulation, which makes sense if you think of private justification systems, such that private justification systems are related to how the unconscious urges, emotions, perceptions, and goals, are converted into conscious thoughts, how you decide to accept them and let them be part of your private self or not and in what way!

>>10728382
Homer the engineer! :^)

>>10729012
jkj?

>>10727492
mmmm membranes?
nth dimensional membranes?

>>10726511
I can perceive it at sufficiently close distances