[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.16013419 [View]
File: 87 KB, 1200x676, apu family.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16013419

And that's a good thing. As it stands now, with pretty much all the social, religious and economic pressure to have children being gone or in the negative, the people who are having children do so because they really want to, and on average, they will be significantly more selfless, agreeable and sociable than the people who aren't.

>Those extremely picky women
>The incels that the women didn't pick
>Chad and Stacy who just want to fuck and spend money and have a dog instead of children
>raging misandrist
>raging misogynist
>lgbt who would've married and have had children in the past due to social pressure, but today can just have a same-gender relationship
>people who simply like being alone

All gone from the gene pool

VS
>mr normie and ms normette, somewhat decent and agreeable people who like family life and decide to have children
who will pass on their genes

We have a huge population to select from and personality is inheritable to an extent, so the effect will be significant. The most obvious example is South Korea, with an abysmal birth rate of 0.70 children per women (2.1 is needed JUST to maintain the population)

In america, conservatives have an increasing fertility gap in their favor compared to liberals
https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-conservative-fertility-advantage

>> No.15904564 [View]

Science™ started declining post 60s
Academia today has become a late stage soviet style bureaucracy run by low IQ apparatchiks, who solely exist to waste money.
Research is marred with incompetency, replication crisis and all sorts of fakery.
Most of it is absolutely useless.
We stopped building stuff long ago, De-Industrialisation (80s) played a major role in this.
All of this is direct consequence of social change that has happened in last 60 years.
Most men today are depressed and pessimistic, they have no hope of a even a decent life that was a norm 30-40 years ago.

>> No.14545590 [View]
File: 38 KB, 708x800, on my science.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14545590

On my science, data that doesn't fit the narrative. By science, let's simply exclude it!

>But before the overhaul, the company’s algorithms and policies did not make a distinction between groups that were more likely to be targets of hate speech versus those that have not been historically marginalized. Comments like “White people are stupid” were treated the same as anti-Semitic or racist slurs.

>In the first phase of the project, which was announced internally to a small group in October, engineers said they had changed the company’s systems to deprioritize policing contemptuous comments about “Whites,” “men” and “Americans.”

>> No.11908294 [View]

>>11906114
Stop empathizing.

>> No.11905370 [View]

>>11905312
Mindfulness while understanding that most memes/ideas/judgements/behaviors are harmful and that they must be edited before they are allowed to form long-lasting neurons in the brain. The world is NOT a friendly, nice place.

Essentially I treat everything as a potential cognito hazard unless I came up with part of it myself. It's interesting that they call schizophrenics paranoid when essentially modulated paranoia is part of the answer to their problems.

I have fairly good people skills so I can hide this process from others and act as if nothing is an issue. A schizophrenic should try to adjust themselves with the lack of empathy of a autist/sociopath, and the insulation of a schizoid while polishing their people skills. Learn to make a joke; being funny is the best way to offset the above shifts.

Clown world. Honk Honk.

>> No.11905337 [View]

>>11905309
I think empathizing is nothing but trouble.
I'm better off without it, that's for sure.
Empathizing programs your mind to be similar to that which is empathized with, since you are experiencing the world from their point of view for a moment and that process forms neurons that correspond to said empathy.
I don't want to install other people's mode of processing, I want to expound on my own mode of processing.
Empathy is how you get crappy clones giving each other asspats because they were programmed to get dopamine dumps for doing so. You ever wonder why females act like they do towards one another and there is less variation between them? Empathy is why.

I know how to empathize and spent most of my life doing so. When I stopped empathizing my mind became a lot clearer.

>> No.11905310 [View]

>>11905277
All incoming information MUST be processed actively and sorted/encoded at the time of experiencing or else it is placed in the subconscious which causes improper integration and faulty neural connections/netting. You have to immerse in reality even while you hang back and process it all as it comes.

>> No.11905271 [View]

>>11905240
Meds don't help, they just cover up the issue so that the individual never learns to deal with it properly. For me, psychosis was just dealing with that which had never been dealt with because I was too naive and hopeful to realize that anything was wrong. I was sponging up anything and everything in my environment and I wasn't actively processing what I was taking in. It was all junk information. The bloatware and trojans of mental software is what I spent years accumulating, and then a few years uninstalling. Though it IS notable it took a lot more time to download all of that bullshit than it took to remove it.

>> No.11905238 [View]

>>11904504
I actually taught the autistic life skills for roughly two years. In order to teach them, you have to understand how their brain functions. Essentially what I was being paid to do was impossible.

>> No.11905229 [View]

>>11903267
I went through a few years of psychosis and then figured out how to stabilize myself without medication. I was smart enough to know better than to get classified as schizo, and had enough psychology chops to know how to avoid the classification, so when I was evaluated I lied where I knew i needed to and was classified bipolar instead. Also, i knew when i was in the ward that I would likely be made to take medication, and I knew that meds for bipolar and schizophrenia are often the same, so then I could try the medication to see what it might do while avoiding the schizophrenia diagnosis.

Ever notice that the word diagnosis is just dia, as in diametric, and gnosis, meaning knowledge?

Diagnosis are diametrically apposed to obtaining knowledge, because a diagnosis results often in being given medication and being given medication prevents you from understanding what is wrong with you and fixing it yourself, gaining knowledge of the root issue in the process.
Medical diagnosis are actually the process of obscuring the Truth by either labeling or obscuring the issue with synthetic medications.

>> No.11902795 [View]

>>11900882
Schizophrenia is the process of living out narrative information and then drowning within those narratives. They learn to respond to narratives instead of what occurs around them. They tie the events that transpire around them into narratives they have picked up along the way and associate the two. To a schizophrenic, the line between fiction and reality does not exist. To them, a mechanism in a story is the same mechanism outside of the story.

Schizophrenia can lay dormant in an individual because they either haven't met the information threshold they would need to meet to disconnect from "consensus" reality, or they haven't run into the particular narrative that would cause the disconnect. So many schizos think they are jesus because that is an often repeated story in this particular culture. The jesus-schizo experiences life events that might be archetypically in line with jesus' narrative, and so a sort of feedback happens where they begin to scan reality for "cues" for their role as jesus. Because art mirrors life (and vice versa), they are trapped within narratives through exposure to reality. Events that might paint them to be the narrative or be experiencing the narrative they have absorbed are wired into the brain as proofs of that fiction. This further ingrains the fiction, and so the next cue/proof that they come to that falls in line with any narrative they might be living out is then connected to the previous neuron holding the previous cue they experienced. They throw pills at them to prevent their brain from growing and making those connections. The only way to prevent the process of paralleling narrative information with everyday occurrences in someone who has learned how to do this is to prevent the brain from growing, so that is EXACTLY what is done.

Autism is described as the inability to anticipate that another's mind experiences different things and an inability to anticipate what others could possibly be going through.

>> No.11902709 [View]

>>11897789
Is it possible to be YY instead of XX or XY?

>> No.11899269 [View]

>>11899262
So why was it used in those instances?
Was telling the kid not to lie not an option?

>> No.11899257 [View]

>>11899249
And the moral of that story is...?

>> No.11899248 [View]

>>11899182
If you knew the Truth then lies would always be apparent to you.

A
parent
lies

>> No.11899240 [View]

>>11899231
Because you were given a task you cannot complete.

>> No.11899232 [View]

>>11899202
Ignoring in-depth analysis and improperly labeling the source of said analysis is maladaptive in every respect. Lies are never efficient.

>> No.11899189 [View]

>>11899168
>>11899174

If I was abused in ways that are worse than what this thread alleges will cause a reduction in IQ and was able to get past that while roasting you like I have been, probably my credentials for speaking about the ill effects of abuse on the development of the brain are solid.

Also, your inability to do anything but cope and seethe actually reflects on your maladapitve emotional responses, not mine.

>> No.11899180 [View]

>>11899157
Also, how would being spanked as a child prevent me from noting that you aren't very intelligent? If spanking causes a release of brain inhibiting cortisol, are you implying that you would prefer I were spanked so I was then not smart enough to note that what goes on between your ears is nothing much?

Are you saying spanking is a good thing because it might prevent people from noting your peanut of a brain?

Do you understand how that sounds and how it reflects upon you?

>> No.11899166 [View]

>>11899157
I was abused in other ways that are infinitely worse than being swatted for mouthing off to your troglodyte mother.

>> No.11899160 [View]

>>11899151
I'm not insane, I'm just smarter than you.
You wouldn't keep responding if it wasn't the case. Man is laden with hubris and envy and will project its insecurities at a moments notice.

>> No.11899098 [View]

>>11899056
You don't need emotions/hormones to tell stories or make up heuristics or mnemonics, those are dependent on how you net information into your neurons and what associations you make with that information when you picked it up/used it at a later time. If you are completely aware of the information that is coming in, you can encode it in a way that makes later access easy. Arguably emotions and hormones would make it more difficult to do that since those would make the information state-dependent. If your state is ALWAYS neutral or joyous(manic) it creates a situation where your recall is almost perfect.

Also, psychosis only occurs when there is a build up of unprocessed/poorly encoded information sitting around in your brain and occurs as an opportunity to rewire faulty neurons into something more efficiently integrated. People that go through psychosis and are labeled schizophrenic and are given pills miss the opportunity to fix themselves. Schizophrenia is medically mandated helplessness.

>>11899059
What is efficient is always effective. If it were not effective, it would not be efficient. The more effective option is always more efficient. The fact that you gave me a (you) illustrates the efficacy of what it is I am telling you.

>> No.11899054 [View]

>>11899033
Also, having your logical brain short circuited is never more efficient then having your logical brain fully functioning AND being able to respond to situations. The logical parts of your mind are more likely to make the most efficient choice. Your eyes are wired into your CNS, so if you need to respond to anything quickly, you rely on your CNS, NOT your emotions. If you rely on emotions you are more likely to make mistakes AND you program yourself to respond without thinking. There is a reason why compulsive behavior is something to be avoided.

>> No.11899043 [View]

>>11899033
I have two questions for you:

1. Did you not read what I posted? It's pretty plainly laid out. It's the Truth.

2. Are you a woman?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]