/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10079664
It's not flawed in any way that makes creationism practical or evolution wrong.

>>9596094
Wish 1) Kill all niggers.
Wish 2) Kill al Muslims.
Wish 3) Kill all Communists.

>>9539346
How edgy.

>>9537664
Re-read the section on limits, retard.

>>9333265
Why not Graham's Number? Why not GN^GN^GN^GN^GN^GN^GN^GN...^GN where there are GN levels of exponents? If you're going to use retard math, at least explain it.

>>9324280
Oh cut the shit! With that IQ you can have a great and comfortable life. Yes, it's unlikely that you'll be the next Einstein or Euler, but why is that such a fucking tragedy you arrogant faggot?

>>9323608
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999......

>>9266928
Are you from an area that has a pixel shortage?

>>9267754
Yes! Sci is not a homework board. Fuck off and leave.

>>9235956
>Is hard work a meme?
No, you lazy fuck. Potential is less than worthless with the work to unlock it.

>>9232271
The last step is wrong. The 8 at the end implies that the decimal eventually stops. Try again.

>>9172327
Fuck you, 4chan is not here to do your homework!

>>9063995
Fuck you, finish Junior High. 4Chan is not a homework help site. You are not welcome until you grow the hell up, literally and figuratively.

>>9045525
You will die instantly. Better KYS now to avoid the wait.

>>8994560
Of course only the richest few will be able to go. That's how new products and services work.

Step 1: New thing is released on the market at a ludicrous price.
Step 2: Super rich people buy it.
Step 3: Since there's proven demand, more companies produce new thing.
Step 4: Price is lowered because of supply/demand.
Step 5: repeat steps 3-4 until it's literally impossible to make a cheaper version with current technology.
Step 6: When it arrives, use new tech to restart from steps 3-4.

At the "end" of the cycle, the product is insanely cheap and of high quality compared to the first model. Think of TVs. The first flat screens were a few thousand dollars a piece and weren't THAT great. But after a decade of competition and market action, you can buy 5 modern TVs for the same price as one old model.

The professor is obviously not trained in economics, tell him to stop succumbing to the Dunning Kruger effect.

>>8808666

Doing the devil's work my friend.

>>8646834
> Volume
> 2-dimensional object
> Being this dumb.

>>8643595
You misspelled "dangerous".

>>8508608
WTF? The amount of increased gravity from the soil (assuming all of it is from space dust because "weather? lol what's that?") wouldn't even be MEASURABLE let alone have an effect.

It's because the dinosaur evolved with humongous sizes "in mind". Humans could not become even twice as tall as they are because our bone/muscle structure is not "designed" to support something that big.

>>7980665

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999......

Stop pretending to be smart.

>>7726379

No, I assumed that two ODD numbers summed to 2. Then proved that it was only possible with both numbers equaling 1. However, pointing out that I assumed that the odd numbers had to be the same was a valid criticism. Let me redo the work:

2q+1+2k+1=2
2q+2k=0
q+k=0
q=-k

Now we plug that -k back in.

-2k+1+2k+1=2
0k+1+1=2
1+1=2

Best part is, now k and q can be ANY number that satisfies q=-k. Not just zero.

>>7726365

No, it supposed that there exists two odd numbers, in the form 2q+1, such that their sum is 2. Then it showed that this equation only has a solution if q equals 0. Then they plugged in the result and simplified to 1+1=2.

>>7699416

Are you seriously retarded enough to believe that I'M the one who needs to back up a claim? I'm not saying he's wrong, I'm saying he needs to bring evidence!

Thank god you exist, otherwise the helmet industry would collapse.

>>7701633

You made a claim, back it up.