/sci/ - Science & Math

>yeah i dont really expect answer from here anymore
>it's not like real business is run with chakra or something
>except 4chan maybe
>they also tell you to go to school
>use words and numbers
>nvm i keep making it easier so to be communicable
>4chan is just a really sad place i guess
>bye

>how do i shot web
>i thought it s some bad joke
>what a fucking waste of time
Just gotta gloat abit but since i have most things figured out from form, anatomy to designs, colors, so between composition and rendering it becomes more of trying to individually piece out something that ll reach a number... how would you suppose to, calculate the interactions between all these factors to pre emptive ly know this value, so to expect a good reaction upon release?
A sort of meticulous solution to help decide, a good image that will bring in sales? I suppose the data will come from surveys but from these basic elements i hope to figure out their interaction into something generally correct
>ignorance is bliss i guess
>arent you some useful, lucky bunch

>>6682995
No u

>>4621671
I think what people need to realize is
"It feels as if I am thinking these thoughts", is itself a thought.
The thinker is nothing more than an object of thought masquerading as a subject.

>>4621363
> i'll be too dead to care
I'm sure your mother would.

>>4621336
>well then the entire world is sacred seeing as something has died everywhere at some point.
Do you even know what a grave is?
It's intentional burial, show some respect for the dead.

Graves are sacred.

>>4618135
so you are some sort of subjective idealist?
I'll just throw this brick at you then put an end to that.

>>4618105
why?
Do you know what idealism is?

>>4618085
What is the point?
Outline it, spell it out.
Here si what I'm saying;
The word is the thing, but be careful, "coin" is a word, but a coin isn't.
Now this seems magical, like some sort of linguistic idealism.

>>4618076
>>4618076
the causal source of the empircal regularity that caused me to generate the semantic token "sun" is the sun.

>>4618061
In other words I don't need a schooling on how perception works, and how meaning is use.
Were talking about reference here.

>>4618061
>"The thing I refer to as 'calendar' represents the thing I refer to as 'sun'"
Yes, you refer to the calender with "calender".
How?

>>4618055
But then how is that when I say "cup" I refer to the cup.
A cup I can break, a "cup" I can't.

>>4618042
>not about the calendar or the sun.
Again, you are using 'sun' to refer to the sun.
This 'sun' is a sign which stands in for the sun. As if the sun is somehow being encapsulated into three letters.

>>4618042
So you are saying that the calender and sun are in your brain?
This is absurd you can get burned by the sun and I can throw the calender at you.

>>4618044
>People agreed that the word 'cup' is a symbol for cups
Yes I am saying there is a cup over there in the world. How is it that "cup" somehow magically picks out this object?
Before you say that it's because we agreed that it does, I'm not asking how did "cup come to be a referent for a cup, I'm asking how does reference even work?
"cup" (even if it was "sdfg) seems to magically pick out an object in the world

>>4618036
Light goes into the eyes. Words go out of the mouth and refer to things in the world.
Your saying words are like reverse photons?

>>4618027
What?
Photons travel from your face and react with the negative

>>4618020
Just spell it out.

>>4618007
>How does the calendar refer to the motion of the sun?
I honestly don't know.
You didn't even explain all you said is
> It's because there is a specific structured causal relationship between the calendar and the sun.
This says nothing other than the calender refers to the sun.

>>4618006
no
Relevance?

>>4617994
dunno
Something to do with photons interacting with silver or something
Relevance?

>>4617992
How can you look at electrical signals?