/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5382013
Im working engineer for Oxy petroleum. I dont even have degree. Currently going to CC for math then a MBA. Learning the basics right now for math and cutie engineer at work is tutoring me on the weekends.

>>4231948

Lol, water chemtrail.

10/10

>>4231719

wut

>>4231791

Yeah, weird way to phrase it; I meant the dude framed the unification of the fundamental forces within a Lie group (E8). He calculated the curvature of the "superconnection" (apparently a word of his own invention to describe a special kind of symmetry breaking) between bosons and fermions, and found it produces a Riemann curvature.

>>4231780
>>4231782

Thanks loads guys. Is his work promising? I've heard mixed responses. Regardless he's quite interesting, don't you think?

Please help. I'd really appreciate it.

Guys -

42 year old here. I've been studying/loved mathematics since I was quite young, maybe 4 or 5. I tested out of it in high school so I could study it independently because I didn't like the way it was taught. Since then, I've dropped out of high school, but I still study math incessantly. When I don't have a book, I'm doing problems in my head.

The reason I dropped out of high school is that I have very severe schizophrenia. This has manifested itself in a variety of ways, but I'm on antipsychotics to dilute the attacks that plague me almost daily. That's neither here nor there I guess.

My question is how do you get something published if you've got no academic credentials? I have something that I know is worthy of publish that may get me a full ride at a decent graduate school. I just have no idea how to go about it.

Tl;dr no academic credentials, how do I get something published?

>>4230195

>not greetexting

>2012

>>4230168

>Stanford

>More selective than Yale

>Get 3 questions wrong on the ACT

>Didn't apply on the basis of crew; didn't include in application

>Also accepted at Dartmouth

>We measure body-fat weekly to ensure it doesn't drop below 6 %. Since crew is a sport for athletic people/is competitive (unlike rugby), you need to be the apex of physical fitness.

>My size is literally perfect for rowing crew. I'm attending olympic development this summer.

>Fuck yourself

>>4230152

>Pathetic existence

>Be accepted into Stanford/Stanford's rowing team

>Be 6 feet tall, 172 lbs. @ 6 % body-fat

>Be objectively attractive

>Get a 35 on the ACT

>2012

>>4230145

>Weeping at keyboard because he's discovered he's a bastard

>Trolling

>2012

>>4230139
>I have no self esteem.
>I seek validation.
>This guy made a typo.
>I jump on the occasion to demonstrate my incredible mastery of basic grammar at the early age of 18.
>I have successfully made myself feel better about my pathetic existence.

>>4230100

>Be me; 18

>Be living in relative affluence

>Correct idiot on grammatical error; a topic he spent 4 years studying

>Same moron confirms I want to major in math/science through his sheer ignorance of both the subtleties of the English language and what makes people happy

>You're going to die the same way as the homeless man you pass every day in your expensive car; world-weary, alone, and terrified

>Throw money at it

>Good luck bro

>>4230027

>Loved literature pissant

>Loved literature

>Loved

>Past tense

>English major

>2012

>>4230063

>Idiot

>Anecdotal, not anecdotal evidence

>Definition in picture still proves you wrong

>No critical reading ability

>autism

>>4230028

>Create video

>Make truth claims

>Don't provide citations

>Upload to YouTube

>Regardless nowhere in any video does it suggest dolphins have 85-90 IQ

>2012

>>4230022

>Anecdotal: based on personal observation, case study reports, or random investigations rather than systematic scientific evaluation. [dictionary.com]

>confirmed for autism

>>4230023

>implying there is any semblance of truth in that picture

>>4229936
[citation needed]

What about all the Tesla conspiracy theories? What do they consist of? Any credence to them?

>>4229926

That's very interesting. What gives things like loop quantum gravity sway over string theory though? Has LQG made any novel predictions that we've found to be true?

>>4229900

I yield to your triple dubs. Seriously though why don't you think it's viable? I've never gotten a different perspective.

>>4229885

>Criticizing string theory

>Not theoretical physicist

Explain.