[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12640562 [View]

drawn

>> No.12640550 [View]
File: 2.14 MB, 2448x3264, 16118913007543513313138918941606.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12640550

we all know the three dimensions of a cube that is draw on a paper

the 4th dimension in this case would be the paper

in a real cube the 4th dimension would be space

true or false?

>> No.12526826 [View]
File: 65 KB, 590x393, particle accelerator.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12526826

a particle can reach 99,99% of speed of light in a particle accelerator

why can't it surpass this speed even when there is a force forcing the particle to accelerate?

there must be an opposing force to it

what's the nature of this opposing force?

>> No.12515419 [View]

>>12515412

WHY DOEST IT TRAVEL? WHY DOES IT MOVE YOU FUCKING CATTLE? FUCKING SHEEP

>> No.12515407 [View]
File: 1.43 MB, 1280x720, gravity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12515407

Oh but things fall in the space-time geometry.

WHY THE FUCK DOEST IT FALL? THE QUESTION IS THE SAME OF THE BEGINNING, WHY DO THINGS FALL?

Oh hur durr if falls because of geometry.

Go fuck yourself.

>> No.12501682 [View]
File: 25 KB, 360x200, opposing force.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12501682

According to mainstream Science the speed limit of the universe is the speed of light. Not sure if this is really true but let's say that it is.

Well let's say that an object is travelling through space at the speed of light and a force is applied upon on it tending to accelerate the object.

Well, that's basic, if there is a force accelerating an object at the speed of light it should surpass this speed.

UNLESS an hypothetical new force suddenly appears in opposition to this force that is accelerating the object.

Example: light beam travelling in direction to the center of a black hole. The black hole has a force of acceleration that is it's gravity.

If the force of gravity isn't making any effect on the speed of the light beam there is only one explanation: another force is opposing to it and deaccelerating the object.

That's what I wanna discuss with you today. I have my ideas about this force but I wanna ask your first what you think about it and if you really think that it's real.

>> No.12113054 [View]
File: 83 KB, 1280x720, proteins.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12113054

According to me what COVID-19 wants is proteins. It loves proteins.

A way to find the cure is finding a way to poison our proteins without killing ourselves.

>> No.12113010 [View]

How can the universe be 4d if time is just something that exists only in our minds?

Einstein was a brainlet.

>> No.12112994 [View]

Thanks for all the replies, anons. No one has convinced me.

Time is not part of nature, it's something created by the human mind.

It's ridiculous to use time in a theory. There is no space-time, just space.

>> No.11962671 [View]

>>11962663

Believe it your answer is better than most of the rest.

>> No.11962638 [View]

>>11962627

This force that we are talking about is the gravitational one. Energy comes from somewhere to push the object. The wonder is how can be this force apparently limitless.

>> No.11962624 [View]

>>11962617

so is this spontaneous generation of energy? how can a body move faster using a force and this source of force doesn't lose energy?

answer it mongoloid

>> No.11962614 [View]

>>11962605

Then answer, mongoloid.

>> No.11962611 [View]

Just one guy answered and I still see no point.

Something has lost energy making the asteroid move in example above.

I'd like to listen more answers about the thing that has lost energy.

So it makes the gravitational field weaker?

>> No.11962599 [View]

>>11962588

Strange fellow who doesn't answer questions and say that is PhD

I don't give a fuck for your shitty degree, I see you as an inferior being. Now fuck off.

>> No.11962587 [View]

>>11962578

Good answer.

>> No.11962584 [View]

>>11962569

Your PhD isn't giving me any answer.

Let's use the example of an asteroid that is moving at constant speed then it is passing close to Jupiter. Gravitational force gives it speed but the asteroid doen't touch the planet.

So now the asteroid is in space again moving faster. Something has spent energy making the asteroid moves faster. Agree?

Now where is the energy coming from?

U mad bro?

This force that pushed the asteroid

>> No.11962564 [View]

>>11962559

No dude the body is in constant movement in space than it starts to move faster thanks to the gravitational force.

I'd like to listen to an answer from someone who really understands general and special relativity.

>> No.11962557 [View]

>>11962532
>>11962539

This is impossible, something is losing energy. When something from space starts to move against Earth thanks to gravity there is energy being added. This energy comes from somewhere. It can be a magical force...

>> No.11962520 [View]

>>11962516

We are right now being pushed by gravity in direction to the center of Earth. Energy is being added on us. So something is loosing energy, What is losing energy?

>> No.11962517 [View]

>>11962516

It's weird because it sounds infinite but I'm sure that it's not. How is this explained by general and special relativity?

>> No.11962505 [View]
File: 249 KB, 1920x715, 1920px-Spacetime_lattice_analogy.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11962505

Sounds strange.

Why does gravitational energy appear to be infinite? How would you explain it?

>> No.11939003 [View]

>>11938989

The fuck you talking about bro it's the water's movement that generates energy and it's caused by gravity.

>> No.11938981 [View]

>>11938978

The point is that by logic this is impossible, something is losing energy don't you agree?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]