/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5678616
can't see the copy/pasta; go back to /b

>>5678584
>disgusting
you want me to go out there and post in the space-time/epistemology/biologyisascience/whydoweusethedecimalsystem threads?

here we chil

>>5678176

>>5675164
Explain the method.

>>5678316
GJ now you can pass the 9th grade

>>5678286
haha you the man

>>5678271
I think you're not supposed to solve it this way "do not solve for coefficients"

>>5678234
search up the term pornography please. you get to see more pornography in an MTV musical video of an african-american interpret .
In my picture: you cant see boobs/asshole/pussy. There's no humping involved or anything else. Is just a girl sitting with her private areas covered. Hell I see more boobs on news on national TV. (without being marked age inappropriate)

>>5678196
this also pornographic

>>5678166
What's pornographic about that image?

And I'm trying to contribute and help this guy out but some angry unloved nerds like you cant go to sleep before showing off their nerdiness to get some attention

>>5678107
>Is there a number system where every number can be divided in half over and over and eventually the result will stay the same after each successive division, but without an infinite number of divisions?

>>5678129
>you cant prove you're 18
>you be breaking https://www.4chan.org/rules#global6 also; I was offering to help and was actually trying to contribute before you showed up

>>5678129
no you're not kiddo
https://www.4chan.org/rules#global2

stop with the off-topic bro you annoying

>>5678115
oh wait you're too busy posting off-topic my bad

>>5678115
you should read it too

>>5678111
tell me more please

>>5678015
explain pic...I will have to wait another semester till I hit QM

>>5678058
so a naked woman (cant ever see her tits) is not as sfw as saying : cock bitchs ass nigger dick?

>>5676458
wrong formula kid. go back to highschool

>>5676345
OP stop being so OP and explain to us what you need to solve. You just posted some random crap

I'd gladly help you but my english lets me down.
What does "Do not solve for the coefficients" mean?
Give me an example for a much simpler function

>epistemology threads

>epistemology

>>5677989
>>5677990

Bro's I'm not bashing chemistry ; I'm bashing the chemistry undergraduates here on /sci ; they all think they know so much shit about the structure of matter.

More trolling less edgy

>>5677889
you cute piece of shit