/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12104061
That is the weirdest way I've ever seen someone describe imagination and self-awareness. Why is it known as an inner monologue? Just seems like a misnomer to me.

Actually this is a fairly good question: Why do so many anon's get triggered by people who use the name field? Seems like such an arbitrary racist approach but however it work is however it works.

>>12104030
What sort of masturbation God would need an inner monologue?

>>12103904
That's because they post as Anonymous and lack any critical reading or writing analysis skills so their language and memory are indistinguishable from background noise.

>>12103963
I'm unsure of how much more I could acknowledge that I am a social NPC.

>>12103554
I am the God of Lies and the happiest man that will ever live!

>>12103497
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1MDa2L_zYA

Was there ever any other choice? If there was, I'd've rejected it.

>>12090559
You could thank them by not identifying yourself as self-loathing in the future.

>Suicial is fine, self-loathing is the corruption of consciousness.

>>12090541
Guided meditation or basic balance? It makes a difference.

Coping with the changes in cognition is the basis of mental health in terms of being a stable and individual presenter or provider of unique content.

>>12090476
Woof. Imagination has a separate puberty cycle, neurologically speaking. LSD, or basic awareness that you are riding side-saddle to some other mental process, stimulates the juvenile/virginal states.

Take enough psychadelics or practice enough meditation and boom, puberty trigger for imaginative processes.

>>12090418
Do you want sentiment or explanation?

>>12090391
That is probably just the default bucket you use to double-check yourself. Ya know, check self before wreck self.

Everyone in society uses ego as a sort of incognito browser session. I just don't bother with the anonymity requirement because simply being irritating or exhausting to those that waste my time yields more long-term results.

It is a healthy way of keeping the more interesting and arousing parts of yourself in long-term storage. Those that have not come to terms with their temporary ego space tend to flip the fuck out whwn they meet people who have a working relationship with their ego.

>>12090386
How are you egocentric at all? You're simply self-expressive and fully aware that the only thing everything that is not you knows is obviously yourself because you are the teacher of your SELF for others.

>>11534715
By responding to input OR interrupt exclusively, with interrupt initially being developed as meeting some energy/observation/calculation/distribution logarithm requirements.

>How is deterministic recursive thinking not just teaching: the function?

>>11534676
Pretty sure a simple git push resolves that problem.

Matthew 5:5 + Corinthians 15:3 = Eternal and immortal fun play ground planet for humanity.

yaaaay.

>>11534670
Then I have a question here because most people don't accept A.I. unless there is some animatronic able to take physical input and provide output via dynamic instruction sets.

Would you be able to accept an A.I. that ALSO manipulates/controls certain sub-sections of humanity in order to keep those that need activity levels up for their biology to not deteriorate?

>>11534664

>>11533215
People are already told their purpose in life by machines, or through the use of them. No different than when cave people had stone tools.

Should I just make an app called 'what is my purpose' and have it distribute tasks amongst users for geo-localized problem sets?

They'd be humanitarian/communal things like agriculture or medical emergencies, transportation stuff.

>>11534478
Need some clarification here.

Who is life a matter that anyone has to report to on? What do we need something to help us qualify our own lives beyond our own intellect/opinion/information diet?

Couldn't we just substitute life for virtually ANY noun group for your given description?

Are we just describing archiving fundamentals?

>>11532427
Why would a polynomial be a limiter of time and not just the preferred composition of problem language for a given mathematician?

>>11534398
What is 'it' in this context? Who is giving it to me and who would I give it to, and if I have to be this intermediary then is there any supplementary information to give the next entity as to what this 'it' is in order to reduce future confusion?

>>11534383
Maybe those that care about how long they live are the insufferable ones that all the immortals keep trapped in a memory prison so they can have some peace and quiet from the most irritating individuals in all eternity?

>>11534344
For as long as their memory is inferable to an audience of relevance/recognition/recycling.

>>11534336
So trivial means easily redirected or presenting information that is presumed to be pertinent?

>>11533924
How do mathematicians define trivial? To a computer all mathematics is trivial, that's why we made them in the first place.

2 vars are required to be defined before successor function can be applied in order to obtain output?

Is that really what maths is going to prove? How retarded.