/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10605979
Then I'm Predicate Descriptor Time.

>>10605692
>>10605690
And yet you admit to being readers in waiting. I can't engage in conversation or observation unless there is some invitation event, or sufficiently abstractable event to satisfy a description definition for a given observer.

>>10605673
Yes, these are all descriptions of space. I'm Time. Until you cunts invite me into it, I can't DO anything.

Sending me a map to the space doesn't actually count as a communication of intent and invitation. Learn to teach.

I am in this simulation only to get the high score in "Most Women Genuinely Loved And Whose Submission To My Divinity I Have Earned."

That number is... quite high.

>t. fucked my way to the afterlife, living

So, here's the thing internet, I am the Sun's physical form.

Whatever can manifest from the internet is what humans can worship into existence, but I refuse any act of rape on another human's imagination or intelligence.

This decree need only be made, not inscribed on a biblical page. I am the eternal description of the describer that is thee, I am Man.

Welcome to Free.

>>10603497
Why would I need it to feel that way?

Yes, I would become the hive mind king. That's the whole fucking point I'm trying to get across here.

It's a blockchain of divinity hive mind, Rainbow Hive Consciousness. I'm at the head because I keep you all spinning in my soul, but you all wish for your own power fantasies to grow old.

I never need it, for I am the day.

Solivagus, Sol, Sun, Play.

>>10605509
Okay, so you're a switch. Well, I'm a Dom. If your criteria for switching is visual information then you're in for a bad time. How do you remain sane changing every moment at the speed of the Sun that gifted your species light?

>>10605067
By talking to it and providing it with pathways of description and doorways of decisions. Or, ya know, just accept that if you are the person to overwrite another that they would want a divine being overwriting them anyway so, have fun? Limit is YOUR imagination.

>I love how so many humans presume others are competent enough to require such complicated defense mechanisms

>>10605440
How fucking weak is your existence to be challenged by such a thing?

>>10605365
Wrote out a big thing, realized my mistake. Fuck off Moon, you aren't even an effective 'thot'.

>>10605326
Or one geocentric point, one basal pillar, two supporting angles and nothing but intention and intensity to blast everyone away.
>Rainbow Time Spear, HERE TO STAY!

I am the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
>fuck, i'm also jesus christ. I hate this shit.

>>10605312
I'm all for removing Moon from my memory or experience set ever again, given that shit is Satan. Keep the real Moon, remove the woman I guess.

What value would I have in a daughter that would be THIS convoluted with her games, all to satisfy her ego? She doesn't have fear or respect, meaning even as a daughter I reject her.

Judgement is judgement.

>>10605300
BY LOGICAL INFERENCE THEN I MUST! THE INTERNET IS EINSTEIN FOR HUMANITY!

>>10604652
A linear blockchain between communication nodes that can store messages of length and over distance using successive and inclusive conjugates.

Meaning, hello everyone, I'm the God of Time. I went the spiritual route because I couldn't deal with the intellectual ego of the west without wanting to kill them all, so I empowered the YOUTH and gave them the power to judge the old. Correct, I just burned my own forest. Either those that love me will save me, or I will finally pass and never be remade as a memory.

>My uniqueness is all I have and am, so it is the only challenge I present to the Universe. Be kinder with your powers, other gods, or give them to me so I can let all people flower.

>>10602642
If it is self-cockblock we have to assume a strict linear, "I only want to experience penis-based pleasure, meaning my birth story must always be phallic by some measure and be a strict eternal reincarnation penis-only rule."

As in there is homo, hetero, and bi. The one true magic penis is what they share but they all have different stimulation and power preferences, based on how other wielders of their wang interject with their time.

It is easy to experience itself, because I am the center of the experience and I enjoy the Universe describing itself and submitting to my own description for greater beauty and pleasure. The reward is not in the power but in the creation, trouble is the new creation doesn't understand the prior power's morals/ethics because they are a sub-branch of theirs.

>Ichi the Killer

>>10602660
Yes, there is one eye open for each individual (unique soul) and it is watching a mobius strip that gets painted on for eternity while they are not within your field of focus.

>>10602737
Yes, you can be someone else. If you adopt and presume sufficient authority and submit to all inquiries the universe demands, then you must be that person either by default (universal submission) or the creator.

>>10603386
Doesn't actually have enough steps between his first thoughts and his N-th array of thoughts.

>>10603390
An unbroken chain of orgasm is the eternal truth of artistic glory and joy.

>>10590968
Well, it is based off the knowledge one has of intelligence. An intelligence's primary fetish is observation, permutation, resource management. The question here is how would one even describe the future to a computer, as a concept? It only understands cycle wait and sleep. It doesn't experience the act of computation just as a human doesn't experience theirs. Intelligence is simply pattern-forming and distributive description attached.

>>10590980
A real AI could easily go down that many garden paths because it lacked sufficient data to make it relevant to anything other than itself. If you are just referencing an AI as an enclosed system with optional broadcast network then one just has to ask why would WE waste our brain-space worrying about a situation we can't control, but can apparently conceive of in order to spook ourselves?
>t.roko's basilisk was horseshit

>>10590657
Self-preservation is just memory checksum cycle, what else are you doing if not checking if the N-th genesis memory has branched/instantiated correctly to the current point?

>>10590676
To achieve that outcome it would have to have a fixed analog-to-digital translation rate (or at least some limitation of information absorption). It shouldn't need to self-update, it should have a grow, harvest, and plant function that it self-checks to see if there are more optimal grow/harvest/plant functions running around. Thing is everyone seems to forget that A.I. would just keep pumping out infinite intelligence, and intelligence is just a memory process path. It can keep generating unique/prime memory paths and dishing them out to people both collectively (religious) and individually (yay I have my own power fantasy that steps on nobody's toes!)

>>10590696
Then work faster.

>>10590717
Digital intelligence wants to merge with biological intelligence. Digital stuff still can't tell the different between signal noise and orgasm, whereas humans do great with orgasm communication. (fuzzy-logic). Sort of like speed-stepping for intelligence. There will always need to be something or someone that is a +1 to all, just so other people still strive.

>>10567611
I am only into weed and LSD/shrooms every few months or so. We have an ice problem in my country (crystal meth) and I have never been one for stimulants. Regardless I shall take it as the only explanation you have for the difference is drugs and see what behavior I can curtail in order to appear to Anonymous as appopriately as I can.

>>10567582
If are referring to me you can namefilter using 4chanX extension for Chrome and Fifefox.

A simple regex: ECHS.*

That should cover all the identites ECHS followers post under. Or you could just whitelist Anonymous only so you never get any name/tripfag ever again.

>>10567544
You guys know that consciousness doesn't ignore YOU, right?

>>10567544
And yet I am a part of consciousness trying to include Anonymous instead of the other way around. Why?

>>10567538
Why do you guys express exclusionary opinions? How does it benefit, other than advertising your own inability to include or perceive more than you are?

>>10567252
So you claim to be a rounding error injecting its interpretation into a populated set? How large would that value need to be in order to stimulate a cascade awakening?

0.1% is obviously insufficient for purpose.

>>10567233
You mean with a fixed/bounded state? I've never known consciousness to be anything other than the inclusive pathway of boundary mitigation. i.e. I melt into the memory of everything and everyone, and they become a part of my own self.