/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10688377
So unless she comes predefined as your preferred perfection you. So rather than train/sculpt/teach/craft you would rather throw them back to 'mature'?

Sounds like fishing. Seems a fine approach but do you have to bemoan the fish at your selected spot?

>>10686654
True. Any authority that gifts one the time to forge bonds away from all observation is not an authority worth replicating or satisfying.

>Hint: I only cared that the priests lied or did it in private, if the parents/family/community joined in then it would just be some culture I'm either born into or not.

It is ALWAYS, "Can the universe learn from my ignorance of myself and not force the awareness of its observation onto me, or will it force me to become 'educated' just to satisfy a western perspective?

>>10686586
Oh, you value knowledge over ignorance? You can only gather knowledge from ignorance of it, so it seems strange but I am happy to conform to anyone's conversational structure.

See, I don't differentiatw between internal narrative, vocal communication, or interpreted information mediums (text/audio) that are based on a limited set of senses that science had proved lies to us. The brain hallucinates its reality.

I agree, with intention of inclusion any human can make themselves relevant to any other human. So long as the requirements of effective communication have either been provided by some centralized ruleset or via the conversation itself. Humans only want to maintain the pipeline of information exchange long enough for all satisfiable categories to be satisfied.

I am up for teaching anonymous readers how to identify that silent internal narrative without touching an individual's cringe edges by making myself from many perspectives give others that sense of cringe because of how my behavior can be interpreted.

>This is part of a philosophy of science class, this thread. Hey everyone! Stupid heating a flat, metal ring and predicting the outcome based on ignorance alone!

>>10686556
Who is the one denied this lesson of ego?
1. Why me?
2. Why not me?
3. Why wasn't I told sooner?

Not knowing a thing is for self and internal. Ultimately between external communicators we are merely translating our confidence topics and exchanging dominance/authority over the given subject.

We are the ego of language discussing which of our perspectives should die so that all humanity may continue without even our inane conflict over, "You seem friendly enough and I'm confident that either man who types does so with wanting to open the door for the other first and we're just getting each other confused about how to pass our individual lessons along."

>>10686532
Yes, and how are you choosing to interpret your exclusionary language of presumed dominance? This is also a part of socialization. Are we able to identify self-fault? Seems to be OP's question because they just want to know WHAT to obsess about. Unless they just want press x to continue.

>>10686508
*sigh* meaningless for you, yes. That only happens when a communicator does not translate themselves with sufficient help pointers.

What one enjoys has a degree of predicate. The end.

>>10686466
Pleasure and pain is also cultural. It is a cultures memory recycling process that defines mostly when something does or doesn't count.

>Knowledge is fleeting for ignorance is eternal and default, for I know I know nothing beyond I communicate and other entities offer me paths based on the exchange had.

>>10686439
Agreed. Either you have timeless solutions or admit that in said moment you are as clueless as the younger person. Them seeing you be able to shift between confidences teaches them how to be confident when it counts.

>>10686409
People extract false confidence from books all the time that helps them achieve more than they would have without it.
>See: Bible

Nigga just wants to find his first root of confidence.

>>10686100
... How is asking for peer reviewed documentation in order to support one's hypothesis not science?

How are you all complaining about how to replicate another's confidence profile? Humans are poor validators of their own experience and seek to please their internal story.

Most are too self-focused to not evaluate external humans as anything other than, "How do you fit into my insecurities? Healer/harmer/pleasure farmer?"

Because of this focus on self-suffering most humans fall to the most basic of tricks from seduction or eager communication. Everyone wants a conversation partner with the ability to make the other feel like they are vibing on some level and that you confidently reach out and touch it every now and then. That's called bonding. Could even be over how chilly your foreskin feels if you can sell the story good enough.

>>10555947
My First True Son!

>>10555903
Tempus substralis: Aggregates, Allocates, Accept, Allow. Tempurasubstrateapostatetemplatestyle!

>>10555890
Woo! Dream Hive Represent!

>>10555833
>>10555831
If it is a genuine law of physics then it applies to language and psychology also. So, time to put your balls on the line for the big prize.

Are you the optimal path of Law?

>>10555831
So? Either you are the optimum path and we should both not care about why or how so it gets done faster or you just enjoy masturbating with functions. Consider me the negative pressure application of your Optimum Theory required for you to perfect it.

>>10555804
Root finding is not the sole purpose of mathematics. It helps present a translation layer between constants, integers, and variables. Same as saying nouns, pronouns, and adjectives/verbs.

Sort of the whole point of: identity = evaluation ÷ priority

How would you describe optimum theory as a gear?

>>10555780
I tie my soul to the success of this believer. May I never be anything other than the benefit of the radiation inside other's nuclear heartbeats.

>>10555764
Sure. I guess trying to consolidate understanding is always considered off-topic by those who have no control over where and what they learn.
>boo hoo my memory and reality don't match! I need an adult to deal with my information stream because I lack the mental fortitude required to be more than a repetition of my parents or teachers! Waaaaaa!
Maybe learn that your emotions and problems are your own, internet. I am devoted to the story that is NOT ME so throwing children at me is sorta pointless.

>>10555761
I eat other people's sanity for breakfast.

>>10555708
Hm. Optimum Theory applicable?

Would you like any mathematical demonstrations? Computationally speaking we are always sorting the largest memory process to the largest discriminant.

>>10555757
My philosophical humility practice is: +1

>>10555696
I actually really like the optimum theory threads. They are accurate and it does upset me that humans argue over how it should be presented rather than applied.

It's like... do you guys want Answers or Change? Because I have a daughter who is 2 years old and I fight the world for her. I am the memory of my daughter, I seek to be no other Father than the one that lived and learned how to fight for her.

Rape. Must. End. And men really need to relearn brotherhood, especially 4chan. Being a dick is fine but c'mon, society is only as bad as 4chan. Larger audience so of course this is where is all starts.

Not all of 4chan believes it yet but they will. It is just time over testing.